IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/fpaper/99-wp223.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Food Self-Sufficiency, Comparative Advantage, and Agricultural Trade: A Policy Analysis Matrix for Chinese Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng Fang
  • John C. Beghin

Abstract

(Revised) China's rapid economic growth and gradual transition toward a market economy have brought about significant changes in production and consumption patterns and trade behavior in agriculture. In this study the authors assess the comparative advantage and protection of China's major agricultural crops using a modified Policy Analysis Matrix IPAMI and data from 1996 to 1998. Results strongly suggest that China has a comparative advantage in labor-intensive crops and a disadvantage in land-intensive crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng Fang & John C. Beghin, 2000. "Food Self-Sufficiency, Comparative Advantage, and Agricultural Trade: A Policy Analysis Matrix for Chinese Agriculture," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 99-wp223, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    • Handle: RePEc:ias:fpaper:99-wp223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/99wp223.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=319
    File Function: Online Synopsis
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnson, D. Gale, 1994. "Does China have a grain problem?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandratos, Nikos, 1996. "China's projected cereals deficits in a world context," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Fan, Shenggen & Agcaoili-Sombilla, Mercedita C., 1997. "Why projections on China's future food supply and demand differ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 41(2), pages 1-22.
    3. Fruin, Jerry E. & Mussell, Al, 1996. "United States And Canadian Agricultural Trade, Transportation And Competition--Post Nafta; Proceedings Of A Symposium Sponsored By Nc-179, "Agricultural And Rural Transportation Systems," He," Staff Papers 13586, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. David, Cristina C., 1996. "Food: Is a Crisis Looming," Discussion Papers DP 1996-09, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    5. Rozelle, Scott & Rosegrant, Mark W., 1997. "China's past, present, and future food economy: can China continue to meet the challenges?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 191-200, June.
    6. Fredoun Z. Ahmadi‐Esfahani & Christopher G. Locke, 1998. "The Industrial Organization Of The Chinese Food Economy: Socialistic Or Capitalistic?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 16(1), pages 34-46, January.
    7. Alexandratos, Nicholas & de Haen, Hartwig, 1995. "World consumption of cereals: will it double by 2025?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 359-366, August.
    8. Yuanzhi Guo & Jieyong Wang, 2021. "Identifying the Determinants of Nongrain Farming in China and Its Implications for Agricultural Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Carter, Colin & Lee, Hyunok & Sumner, Daniel, 1995. "Policy Paper 17: Regional Economic Cooperation: The Role of Agricultural Production and Trade in Northeast Asia," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt0fx1q4q4, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ias:fpaper:99-wp223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/faiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.