Trade in Value Added Revisited: A Comment on R. Johnson and G. Noguera, Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added
In light of growing intermediate goods trade, Johnson and Noguera (2012) developed theoretical and empirical research on the new concept of trade in value added in place of gross trade. However, they did not deal with the relationship between the new value added trade balance and the gross trade balance. Presented here is that in the case of two countries and many sectors the new value added trade balance always equals the gross trade balance. We verify this proposition by using an international input-output data compiled by Groningen University. In the case with three countries (China, the USA and the rest of the world; ROW) and many sectors, the China-USA trade balance or the USA-China imbalance measured in value added for 2010 is 23.5% smaller than that in gross terms, whereas the China-ROW trade balance in value added is 94% larger than that in gross terms.
|Date of creation:||Jan 2014|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi City, Tokyo 186|
Web page: http://www.ier.hit-u.ac.jp/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Johnson, Robert C. & Noguera, Guillermo, 2012. "Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 224-236.
- Robert Koopman & William Powers & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2011.
"Give Credit where Credit is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains,"
312011, Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research.
- Robert Koopman & William Powers & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2010. "Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains," NBER Working Papers 16426, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Daniel Trefler & Susan Chun Zhu, 2005.
"The Structure of Factor Content Predictions,"
NBER Working Papers
11221, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hit:hituec:598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Hiromichi Miyake)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.