IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-02082270.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing outcomes profiles of public programmes with ELECTRE assistance instead of observing evolution of a synthetic impact index :illustration of the benefits of a multicriteria evaluation approach

Author

Listed:
  • Maurice Baslé

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This paper will show how we could ameliorate the quality of public policies and programmes monitoring and on going evaluations by using established outranking methods and Electre software assistance.. The craftiness is to take the outcomes of programmes for each period and to elaborate the outcomes multidimensional profile, and then to compare these profiles year after year without having the need to calculate and to observe the evolution of the corresponding synthetic impact index. This article outlines all of the net advantages of comparing annual outcomes profiles rather than the evolution of theaggregatei index. We aim to show that the outcomes profiles can be compared by the same outranking methods as those used in the case of several options or projects compared during the same year. The well-known Electre software assistance is used.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurice Baslé, 2019. "Comparing outcomes profiles of public programmes with ELECTRE assistance instead of observing evolution of a synthetic impact index :illustration of the benefits of a multicriteria evaluation approach," Working Papers hal-02082270, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02082270
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02082270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02082270/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2056 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Maurice Baslé, 2008. "Economie, conseil et gestion publique : Suivi et évaluation des politiques publiques et des programmes," Post-Print halshs-00315901, HAL.
    3. Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant & Marc Pirlot & Alexis Tsoukiàs & Philippe Vincke, 2006. "Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-31099-2, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maurice Baslé, 2021. "Smarter Cities’ Attractiveness. Testing New Criteria or Facets: “Data Scientists” and “Data Platforms”," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(1), pages 268-278, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khannoussi, Arwa & Meyer, Patrick & Chaubet, Aurore, 2023. "A multi-criteria decision aiding approach for upgrading public sewerage systems and its application to the city of Brest," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    2. Paredes-Frigolett, Harold, 2016. "Modeling the effect of responsible research and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 126-133.
    3. Dias, Luis C. & Lamboray, Claude, 2010. "Extensions of the prudence principle to exploit a valued outranking relation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 828-837, March.
    4. Eduardo Fernández & Claudia Gómez-Santillán & Nelson Rangel-Valdez & Laura Cruz-Reyes, 2022. "Group Multi-Objective Optimization Under Imprecision and Uncertainty Using a Novel Interval Outranking Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 945-994, October.
    5. Benjamin Lev, 2006. "Book Reviews," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 608-615, December.
    6. Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis A. & Mun, Johnathan & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2017. "Active management in state-owned energy companies: Integrating a real options approach into multicriteria analysis to make companies sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 487-502.
    7. Khaled Belahcène & Vincent Mousseau & Wassila Ouerdane & Marc Pirlot & Olivier Sobrie, 2023. "Multiple criteria sorting models and methods—Part I: survey of the literature," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-46, March.
    8. Fernández, Eduardo & Figueira, José Rui & Navarro, Jorge, 2019. "An interval extension of the outranking approach and its application to multiple-criteria ordinal classification," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 189-198.
    9. Sébastien Bigaret & Richard E. Hodgett & Patrick Meyer & Tatiana Mironova & Alexandru-Liviu Olteanu, 2017. "Supporting the multi-criteria decision aiding process: R and the MCDA package," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 169-194, November.
    10. Lean Yu & Shouyang Wang & Fenghua Wen & Kin Lai, 2012. "Genetic algorithm-based multi-criteria project portfolio selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 71-86, August.
    11. Giada Marchi & Giulia Lucertini & Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2016. "From evidence-based policy making to policy analytics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(1), pages 15-38, January.
    12. Diaz-Balteiro, L & González-Pachón, J. & Romero, C., 2017. "Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 607-616.
    13. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2020. "How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Paulo H. Baumann & Tiago Milagres Miranda & Fabio Romero & Dário Takahata & Alden Uehara Antunes & João Castilho Neto & Leonardo H. T. Ferreira Neto & Ângelo C. Lorenzo Alves & Luísa Morais Azevedo & , 2016. "Crew Dispatch for Commercial and Technical Services in an Electric Power Distribution Company Using ACO Technique," Asian Engineering Review, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 3(3), pages 17-23.
    15. Manuel Casal-Guisande & Jorge Cerqueiro-Pequeño & José-Benito Bouza-Rodríguez & Alberto Comesaña-Campos, 2023. "Integration of the Wang & Mendel Algorithm into the Application of Fuzzy Expert Systems to Intelligent Clinical Decision Support Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-33, May.
    16. Znidarsic, Martin & Bohanec, Marko & Zupan, Blaz, 2008. "Modelling impacts of cropping systems: Demands and solutions for DEX methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 594-608, September.
    17. Lamboray, Claude, 2009. "A characterization of the prudent order preference function," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 389-405, May.
    18. Bouyssou, Denis & Marchant, Thierry, 2010. "Additive conjoint measurement with ordered categories," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 195-204, May.
    19. Giada de Marchi & Giulia Lucertini & Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2012. "From Evidence-Based Policy-Making to Policy Analytics," Working Papers hal-00875488, HAL.
    20. Marko Bohanec, 2009. "Decision Making: A Computer-Science and Information-Technology Viewpoint," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 7(2), pages 22-37.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02082270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.