IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Projet, Pérennité, Profit : les 3 P de la gouvernance

  • Jean-Pierre Bréchet

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - Université de Nantes : EA4272)

Partant des ingrédients d'une gouvernance exigeante dans le cas d'une entreprise patrimoniale cotée, l'article défend trois dimensions constitutives, dans cet ordre, d'une lecture de la gouvernance : P comme centralité du Projet d'entreprise, P comme Pérennité, P comme Profit. Une telle théorie est indissociable d'une théorie de l'entreprise fondée sur le projet ou Project-Based View. Le premier P trouve ses fondements dans cet effort de théorisation d'une PBV. Le deuxième prend en compte que l'entreprise réelle, en tant que réalité contractuelle ou d'apprentissage, engage un rapport au temps. Enfin, le profit se comprend comme une épreuve et un moyen dans la perspective de maintien de l'entreprise réelle avant que d'être un objet de répartition. La gouvernance et les médiations du pouvoir managérial qu'elle recouvre, trouvent, dans ces 3 P, leurs fondements théoriques et pratiques.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by HAL in its series Working Papers with number hal-00546317.

in new window

Date of creation: 14 Dec 2010
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00546317
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server:
Contact details of provider: Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Gérard Charreaux & Philippe Desbrières, 1998. "Gouvernance des entreprises:valeur partenariale contre valeur actionnariale," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie,, vol. 1(2), pages 57-88, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00546317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.