IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02520841.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quelle réforme du système de retraite ? Les grands enjeux

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Bozio

    (PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris sciences et lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris sciences et lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, IPP - Institut des politiques publiques)

  • Simon Rabaté

    (IPP - Institut des politiques publiques)

  • Audrey Rain

    (IPP - Institut des politiques publiques)

  • Maxime Tô

    (LSE - London School of Economics and Political Science, IPP - Institut des politiques publiques)

Abstract

La réforme des retraites annoncée par M. Emmanuel Macron pendant la campagne présidentielle repose sur un certain nombre de principes généraux, souvent résumés par l'engagement « chaque euro cotisé donne les mêmes droits ». Les détails de la réforme n'étant pas encore connus, cette note vise à contribuer au débat public en présentant les principes fondamentaux d'un système en répartition bien conçu, quel que soit le système cible retenu, et à souligner les points d'arbitrages à trancher par le débat démocratique. Nous mettons ainsi en évidence les avantages à revaloriser les droits à la retraite avec la croissance des salaires, et à poser des règles transparentes d'évolution des taux de liquidation en fonction des conditions démographiques du pays. Les arbitrages à trancher sont néanmoins importants : quel taux de cotisation global choisir ? quelle convergence entre les taux de cotisation des différents régimes ? quelle vitesse à la transition au nouveau système ? comment améliorer les mécanismes de solidarité ? ou encore quelle gouvernance mettre en place ?

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Quelle réforme du système de retraite ? Les grands enjeux," Post-Print halshs-02520841, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02520841
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02520841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02520841/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Didier Blanchet, 2013. "Retraites: vers l’équilibre en longue période ?," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-02527092, HAL.
    2. Didier Blanchet & Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté, 2016. "Quelles options pour réduire la dépendance à la croissance du système de retraite français ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 67(4), pages 879-911.
    3. Muriel Roger & Benoît Rapoport & Thierry Magnac & Antoine Bommier, 2005. "Droits à la retraite et mortalité différentielle," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 168(2), pages 1-16.
    4. Antoine Bozio & Brigitte Dormont, 2016. "Gouverner la protection sociale : transparence et efficacité," Institut des Politiques Publiques hal-02304244, HAL.
    5. Joakim Palme & Walter Korpi, 1998. "The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in the Western Countries," LIS Working papers 174, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    6. Antoine Bozio & Brigitte Dormont, 2016. "Gouverner la protection sociale : transparence et efficacité," Post-Print halshs-01379328, HAL.
    7. Salvador Valdes‐Prieto, 2000. "The Financial Stability of Notional Account Pensions," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 102(3), pages 395-417, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime To, 2019. "Quelles règles de pilotage pour un système de retraite à rendement défini?," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02514738, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Reforming the French pension system : the main challenges," Post-Print halshs-02520835, HAL.
    2. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Reforming the French pension system : the main challenges," Post-Print halshs-02520835, HAL.
    3. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime Tô, 2018. "Quelle réforme du système de retraite ? Les grands enjeux," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-02520841, HAL.
    4. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime To, 2019. "Quelles règles de pilotage pour un système de retraite à rendement défini?," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02514738, HAL.
    5. Bruch, Sarah K. & van der Naald, Joseph & Gornick, Janet C., 2022. "Poverty Reduction through Federal and State Policy Mechanisms: Variation Over Time and Across the U.S. States," SocArXiv jz5xp, Center for Open Science.
    6. Mona Sandbæk, 2017. "European Policies to Promote Children’s Rights and Combat Child Poverty," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, July.
    7. repec:onb:oenbwp:y::i:95:b:1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Jin Wook Kim & Young Jun Choi, 2008. "Private Transfers and Emerging Welfare States in East Asia: Comparative Perspectives," LIS Working papers 507, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    9. Cristiano Perugini & Gaetano Martino, 2008. "Income Inequality Within European Regions: Determinants And Effects On Growth," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 54(3), pages 373-406, September.
    10. Leena Eklund Karlsson & Anne Leena Ikonen & Kothar Mohammed Alqahtani & Pernille Tanggaard Andersen & Subash Thapa, 2020. "Health Equity Lens Embedded in the Public Health Policies of Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Document Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    11. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4aorppjfgr8v2prdh6fmd1kaik is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Frédéric Gannon & Gilles Le Garrec & Gautier Lenfant & Vincent Touze, 2020. "Pension d’un salarié du secteur privé et transitions vers un système universel de retraite par points : Etude d’impact pour une carrière complète sous plafond: Etude d’impact pour une carrière complèt," Sciences Po publications 11/2020, Sciences Po.
    13. Grégory Ponthière, 2020. "Pensions and social justice. From standard retirement to reverse retirement," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(6), pages 193-226.
    14. Antoine Bozio & Clémentine Garrouste & Elsa Perdrix, 2021. "Impact of later retirement on mortality: Evidence from France," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1178-1199, May.
    15. Malte Luebker, 2019. "Can the Structure of Inequality Explain Fiscal Redistribution? Revisiting the Social Affinity Hypothesis," LIS Working papers 762, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    16. John B. Williamson, 2001. "Future Prospects for Notional Defined Contribution Schemes," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(4), pages 19-24, October.
    17. Elvire Guillaud & Matthew Olckers & Michaël Zemmour, 2020. "Four Levers of Redistribution: The Impact of Tax and Transfer Systems on Inequality Reduction," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(2), pages 444-466, June.
    18. Wim Van Lancker & Joris Ghysels, 2013. "Great expectations, but how to achieve them? Explaining patterns of inequality in childcare use across 31 developed countries," Working Papers 1305, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    19. Koen Caminada & Kees Goudswaard & Chen Wang & Jinxian Wang, 2019. "Income Inequality and Fiscal Redistribution in 31 Countries After the Crisis," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 61(1), pages 119-148, March.
    20. Bruno, Bosco & Ambra, Poggi, 2016. "Government effectiveness, middle class and poverty in the EU: A dynamic multilevel analysis," Working Papers 344, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised 27 Jun 2016.
    21. Lindbeck, Assar, 2006. "The Welfare State -- Background, Achievements, Problems," Working Paper Series 662, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    22. Assar Lindbeck & Mats Persson, 2003. "The Gains from Pension Reform," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 41(1), pages 74-112, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02520841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.