IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05545575.html

The social acceptability of the ecological transition: beyond resistance to change
[L’acceptabilité sociale de la transition écologique : au-delà de la résistance au changement]

Author

Listed:
  • Corinne Gendron

    (ESG-UQAM - École des Sciences de la Gestion [UQAM] - UQAM - Université du Québec à Montréal = University of Québec in Montréal)

Abstract

Since its early days, the environmental movement focused on two main strategies: lobbying governments and raising public awareness. After several decades of mobilization, it is clear that while awareness of the ecological crisis is widespread, changes in behavior and policies are not commensurate with the challenges. To explain this gap between environmental awareness and inaction, many are tempted to invoke the thesis of resistance to change. However, even if it can be verified in certain cases, this thesis is largely insufficient to explain the slowness of ecological modernization. Behaviour is largely determined by infrastructures, so that ecological impact depends above all on institutional decisions, whether private or public. At this scale, however, it is difficult to integrate issues such as climate change or ecosystem preservation into the logic of action, not least because of the social implications of restructuring the economic system.

Suggested Citation

  • Corinne Gendron, 2023. "The social acceptability of the ecological transition: beyond resistance to change [L’acceptabilité sociale de la transition écologique : au-delà de la résistance au changement]," Post-Print hal-05545575, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05545575
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05545575v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05545575v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Yukun & Zhu, Danfeng, 2022. "Share pledging and corporate environmental investment," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    2. Corinne Gendron, 2014. "Beyond Environmental and Ecological Economics : Proposal for an Economic Sociology of the Environment," Post-Print hal-01513956, HAL.
    3. José C. M. Pires & Ana L. Gonçalves, 2022. "Microalgae Cultures: Environmental Tool and Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-4, August.
    4. Diogo Matos & Ricardo A. M. Pereira & Helena Ribeiro & Bernardo Mendes & Daniel Belo & Arnaldo Oliveira & Nuno Borges Carvalho, 2022. "Charging Mobile Devices in Indoor Environments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Gendron, Corinne, 2014. "Beyond environmental and ecological economics: Proposal for an economic sociology of the environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 240-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agarwal, S. & Sethi, S., 2026. "Carbon footprint analysis of traditional and innovative cellulosic textile fibers: a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PA).
    2. Avichal Malhotra & Simon Raming & Jérôme Frisch & Christoph van Treeck, 2021. "Open-Source Tool for Transforming CityGML Levels of Detail," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Kolinjivadi, Vijay, 2019. "Avoiding dualisms in ecological economics: Towards a dialectically-informed understanding of co-produced socionatures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 32-41.
    4. Jun Liu & Mengting Yue & Yiming Liu & Ding Wen & Yun Tong, 2022. "The Impact of Tourism on Ecosystem Services Value: A Spatio-Temporal Analysis Based on BRT and GWR Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Vlado Vivoda & Indra Overland & Roman Vakulchuk, 2026. "Navigating ASEAN’s critical materials future: Opportunities, risks and strategic imperatives," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 39(1), pages 231-242, March.
    6. Prévost, Benoît & Rivaud, Audrey, 2018. "The World Bank’s environmental strategies: Assessing the influence of a biased use of New Institutional Economics on legal issues," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 370-380.
    7. Chuansheng Wu & Weixuan Fan & Lingling Qi & Levent Kutlu, 2023. "Study on the Effectiveness of Environmental Regulations and Its Spatial Spillover in China’s High-Quality Human Habitat Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, July.
    8. Joe Ament, 2019. "Toward an Ecological Monetary Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Joutsenvirta, Maria, 2016. "A practice approach to the institutionalization of economic degrowth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 23-32.
    10. Xinyan Wu & Jinmei Ding & Bingjie Lu & Yuanyuan Wan & Linna Shi & Qi Wen, 2022. "Eco-Environmental Effects of Changes in Territorial Spatial Pattern and Their Driving Forces in Qinghai, China (1980–2020)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Gibbs, David & O'Neill, Kirstie, 2017. "Future green economies and regional development: a research agenda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68392, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Tian, Zhongliang & Tang, Ruoyuan & Liu, Wenhe & Qi, Yuan, 2024. "Controlling shareholder's equity pledge and corporate financialization," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    13. Bai, Keke & Jing, Kun & Li, Tianyu, 2024. "Corporate ESG Performance and Stock Pledge Risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    14. Wang, Muyun & Zhang, Ying, 2024. "Controlling shareholders' equity pledge, litigation risk and corporate ESG performance," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    15. Li, Qiang & He, Zichun & Ruan, Wenjuan & Xia, Yulei & Cai, Qingting, 2025. "Reformation of government officials’ performance evaluation and corporate environmental investment: The moderating effect of corporate bargaining power," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 150-168.
    16. Chengcheng Li & Xiaoqiong Wang & Feifei Zhu, 2024. "Does share pledging impair stakeholder welfare? Evidence based on corporate social responsibility," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1155-1192, November.
    17. Bassen, Alexander & Kordsachia, Othar & Lopatta, Kerstin & Tan, Weiqiang, 2025. "Revenue alignment with the EU taxonomy regulation in developed markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    18. Chen, Yinghui & Tong, Ying & Zhou, Can, 2024. "Non-mandatory approaches to corporate environmental engagement: Insights from the Belt and Road Initiative," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1287-1301.
    19. Papadopoulos, Nicolas & Cleveland, Mark, 2023. "An international and cross-cultural perspective on ‘the wired consumer’: The digital divide and device difference dilemmas," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    20. Jose, Amal & Bhaduri, Saumitra, 2024. "Promoter's share pledging and investment–The role of financial constraints," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05545575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.