IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05417560.html

Two-stage non Gaussian QML estimation of GARCH models and testing the efficiency of the Gaussian QMLE

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Francq

    (CREST - Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique - ENSAI - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse de l'Information [Bruz] - Groupe ENSAE-ENSAI - Groupe des Écoles Nationales d'Économie et Statistique - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - ENSAE Paris - École Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Administration Économique - Groupe ENSAE-ENSAI - Groupe des Écoles Nationales d'Économie et Statistique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris)

  • Guillaume Lepage

    (EQUIPPE - Economie Quantitative, Intégration, Politiques Publiques et Econométrie - Université de Lille, Sciences et Technologies - Université de Lille, Sciences Humaines et Sociales - PRES Université Lille Nord de France - Université de Lille, Droit et Santé)

  • Jean-Michel Zakoïan

    (LFA - Laboratoire de Finance Assurance - Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique (CREST) - Groupe ENSAE-ENSAI - Groupe des Écoles Nationales d'Économie et Statistique, EQUIPPE - Economie Quantitative, Intégration, Politiques Publiques et Econométrie - Université de Lille, Sciences et Technologies - Université de Lille, Sciences Humaines et Sociales - PRES Université Lille Nord de France - Université de Lille, Droit et Santé)

Abstract

In generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (GARCH) models, the standard identifiability assumption that the variance of the iid process is equal to 1 can be replaced by an alternative moment assumption. We show that, for estimating the original specification based on the standard identifiability assumption, efficiency gains can be expected from using a quasi-maximum likelihood (QML) estimator based on a non Gaussian density and a reparameterization based on an alternative identifiability assumption. A test allowing to determine whether a reparameterization is needed, that is, whether the more efficient QMLE is obtained with a non Gaussian density, is proposed.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Francq & Guillaume Lepage & Jean-Michel Zakoïan, 2011. "Two-stage non Gaussian QML estimation of GARCH models and testing the efficiency of the Gaussian QMLE," Post-Print hal-05417560, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05417560
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Gouriéroux, Christian & Monfort, Alain & Zakoian, Jean-Michel, 2017. "Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood and Lie Groups of Linear Transformations," MPRA Paper 79623, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Meister, Alexander & Kreiß, Jens-Peter, 2016. "Statistical inference for nonparametric GARCH models," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 126(10), pages 3009-3040.
    4. Herwartz, Helmut, 2017. "Stock return prediction under GARCH — An empirical assessment," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 569-580.
    5. repec:rim:rimwps:18-06 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Francq, Christian & Zakoïan, Jean-Michel, 2015. "Risk-parameter estimation in volatility models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 158-173.
    7. Perera, Indeewara & Silvapulle, Mervyn J., 2023. "Bootstrap specification tests for dynamic conditional distribution models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 949-971.
    8. Fiorentini, Gabriele & Sentana, Enrique, 2019. "Consistent non-Gaussian pseudo maximum likelihood estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 321-358.
    9. Gabriele Fiorentini & Enrique Sentana, 2021. "Specification tests for non‐Gaussian maximum likelihood estimators," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 683-742, July.
    10. Huan Gong & Dong Li, 2020. "On the three‐step non‐Gaussian quasi‐maximum likelihood estimation of heavy‐tailed double autoregressive models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(6), pages 883-891, November.
    11. Zihan Wang & Xinghao Qiao & Dong Li & Howell Tong, 2025. "On a new robust method of inference for general time series models," Papers 2503.08655, arXiv.org.
    12. Mohamed El Ghourabi & Christian Francq & Fedya Telmoudi, 2016. "Consistent Estimation of the Value at Risk When the Error Distribution of the Volatility Model is Misspecified," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 46-76, January.
    13. C. Gouriéroux & A. Monfort & J.‐M. Zakoïan, 2019. "Consistent Pseudo‐Maximum Likelihood Estimators and Groups of Transformations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 327-345, January.
    14. Francq, Christian & Zakoian, Jean-Michel, 2015. "Looking for efficient qml estimation of conditional value-at-risk at multiple risk levels," MPRA Paper 67195, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Delaigle, Aurore & Meister, Alexander & Rombouts, Jeroen, 2016. "Root-T consistent density estimation in GARCH models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 55-63.
    16. Hang Liu & Kanchan Mukherjee, 2022. "R-estimators in GARCH models: asymptotics and applications," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(1), pages 98-113.
    17. Christian Francq & Jean-Michel Zakoïan, 2014. "Multi-level Conditional VaR Estimation in Dynamic Models," Post-Print hal-05430959, HAL.
    18. Yining Chen, 2015. "Semiparametric Time Series Models with Log-concave Innovations: Maximum Likelihood Estimation and its Consistency," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(1), pages 1-31, March.
    19. Zhu, Ke, 2012. "A mixed portmanteau test for ARMA-GARCH model by the quasi-maximum exponential likelihood estimation approach," MPRA Paper 40382, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Christian Francq & Jean-Michel Zakoïan, 2013. "Optimal predictions of powers of conditionally heteroscedastic processes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(2), pages 345-367, March.
    21. Christian Gouriéroux & Alain Monfort & Eric Renault, 2017. "Consistent Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood Estimators," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 125-126, pages 187-218.
    22. Li, Dong & Li, Muyi & Wu, Wuqing, 2014. "On dynamics of volatilities in nonstationary GARCH models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 86-90.
    23. Aknouche, Abdelhakim & Al-Eid, Eid & Demouche, Nacer, 2016. "Generalized quasi-maximum likelihood inference for periodic conditionally heteroskedastic models," MPRA Paper 75770, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Dec 2016.
    24. Abdelhakim Aknouche & Eid Al-Eid & Nacer Demouche, 2018. "Generalized quasi-maximum likelihood inference for periodic conditionally heteroskedastic models," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 485-511, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05417560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.