IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05395817.html

Mutual contributions between local NGOs and companies: a credibility factor for social reporting based on three pillars

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Braun

    (ICN Business School, CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

  • Agnès Ceccarelli

    (ICN Business School, CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

  • Christine Morin-Esteves

    (ICN Business School, CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

Abstract

There is constant criticism of the quality of the extra-financial information disclosed to stakeholders, including NGOs. The lack of credibility of social reporting has as much to do with financial issues as with the operationalization of sustainable development. The collaboration of NGOs at the territorial and local levels with companies is little discussed in empirical research, as is their mutual contribution to the credibility of social reporting. Our qualitative research brings together sustainable development experts and representatives of local NGOs within a space of dialogue. These confrontations bring out reflections that will help companies improve the quality of their social reporting. From a managerial point of view, we show that credibility is based, on the one hand, on close collaboration between companies and local NGOs along three dimensions: a collaborative stance, common means and objectives, and shared values. On the other hand, we show that NGOs contribute through their actions to the construction of the content of social reporting. Our academic contribution concerns the credibility of social reporting, which is based on three pillars: its instrumentalisation, its construction and the disclosure of information.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Braun & Agnès Ceccarelli & Christine Morin-Esteves, 2022. "Mutual contributions between local NGOs and companies: a credibility factor for social reporting based on three pillars," Post-Print hal-05395817, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05395817
    DOI: 10.3917/rips1.072.0005
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-05395817v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-05395817v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/rips1.072.0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Chen & Petra Bouvain, 2009. "Is Corporate Responsibility Converging? A Comparison of Corporate Responsibility Reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 299-317, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrycja Hąbek & Radosław Wolniak, 2016. "Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 399-420, January.
    2. Diana Tuomasjukka & Staffan Berg & Marcus Lindner, 2013. "Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-32, December.
    3. Jerman Damjana & Završnik Bruno, 2012. "The Role of Social Networks for Business in the Marketing Communications," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 59(1), pages 155-168, July.
    4. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    5. Heloïse Berkowitz & Marcelo Bucheli & Hervé Dumez, 2017. "Collectively Designing CSR Through Meta-Organizations: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 753-769, July.
    6. Tzu-Kuan Chiu & Yi-Hsin Wang, 2015. "Determinants of Social Disclosure Quality in Taiwan: An Application of Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 379-398, June.
    7. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Allah Ditta & Zeeshan Mahmood & Rehana Kouser, 2023. "The Role of Sustainability Reporting and Governance in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: An International Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Krishen, Anjala S. & Barnes, Jesse L. & Hu, Han-fen, 2025. "Consumer knowledge and sustainable decision-making: A mixed-method inquiry and proposed model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Dong Ding & Bin Liu & Millicent Chang, 2023. "Carbon Emissions and TCFD Aligned Climate-Related Information Disclosures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 967-1001, February.
    10. Michel Coulmont & Sylvie Berthelot & Vincent Gagné, 2022. "Sustainability performance indicator trends: a Canadian industry-based analysis," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Alex W. Ireland & Laura J. Napoli & Katherine A. Basiotis & Emily J. Voldstad & Kayhan Ostovar, 2020. "Potential conservation benefits of a voluntary corporate certification program," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4889-4905, June.
    12. Humphry Hung, 2011. "Directors’ Roles in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Stakeholder Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 385-402, October.
    13. Sofia Villo & Natalya Turkina, 2023. "How do Russian National Systems of Institutional Absences Shape Insensitive Corporate Environmental Violence of a Russian Extractive Multinational Corporation?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(2), pages 315-331, June.
    14. Jiwon Yang & Jay Hyuk Rhee, 2020. "CSR disclosure against boycotts: evidence from Korea," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 311-343, July.
    15. Lucian SIRB, 2013. "The Prediction of Successful Probability of CSR and Sustainable Development Strategy Implementation within "Rosia Montana Project" using Fuzzy Logic," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(2), pages 130-147.
    16. Maryna Gulenko, 2018. "Mandatory CSR reporting—literature review and future developments in Germany [Nichtfinanzielle Berichterstattungspflicht – Literaturzusammenfassung und Mögliche Entwicklungen in Deutschland]," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 3-17, December.
    17. Inga Hardeck & J. William Harden & David R. Upton, 2021. "Consumer Reactions to Tax Avoidance: Evidence from the United States and Germany," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 75-96, April.
    18. Francesco Gangi & Jérôme Méric & Rémi Jardat & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Business for society," Post-Print hal-02382307, HAL.
    19. Jian Zhang & Dongmin Kong & Ji Wu, 2018. "Doing Good Business by Hiring Directors with Foreign Experience," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 859-876, December.
    20. Víctor Amor‐Esteban & María Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2020. "Bias in composite indexes of CSR practice: An analysis of CUR matrix decomposition," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1914-1936, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05395817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.