IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05235514.html

Les pionniers des communautés citoyennes d'énergie en France : Typologie, développement et perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Christine Eiller

    (EDF R&D SEQUOIA - EDF R&D - EDF R&D - EDF [E.D.F.] - EDF – Électricité de France)

  • Valérie Lesgards

    (EDF R&D SEQUOIA - EDF R&D - EDF R&D - EDF [E.D.F.] - EDF – Électricité de France)

Abstract

Cette communication traite des initiatives citoyennes dans les projets énergétiques, préexistantes à la réglementation européenne et française. Elle vise à identifier les motivations initiales des citoyens dans les projets ainsi que leur modèle d'organisation et d'implication. A partir du retour d'expérience des pionniers des communautés d'énergie, du recueil de leurs difficultés et de leurs succès sur la vie du projet, cette étude vise à répondre aux trois questions de recherches suivantes. i) Peut-on établir une typologie de projets citoyens nés au stade pré réglementaire ? Quels sont les fondamentaux de leur création et de leur constitution en termes d'objectifs, de gouvernance, de bénéfices attendus ? Il s'agit à ce stade de préciser l'ensemble des éléments du projet initial, de façon à établir une typologie des modèles de participation citoyenne. Le chapitre 3 est consacré à cette typologie. ii) Comment ces modèles ont-ils évolué dans le temps ? Quelle influence a eu la réglementation européenne et sa transposition dans le droit français sur leur évolution et sur leur dissémination ? Il convient d'examiner les résultats du projet, perçus par leur responsable, en termes de réalisation d'objectifs, de bénéfices escomptés et d'évolution. Le chapitre 3 traite également de ces questions. iii) Quels sont les facteurs de succès de ces communautés pionnières ? En particulier, comment résistent-elles aux aléas économiques et aux fluctuations des prix de l'énergie ? Le chapitre 4 identifie les facteurs qui facilitent le développement et la pérennité des communautés de citoyens.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Christine Eiller & Valérie Lesgards, 2025. "Les pionniers des communautés citoyennes d'énergie en France : Typologie, développement et perspectives," Post-Print hal-05235514, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05235514
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://edf.hal.science/hal-05235514v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://edf.hal.science/hal-05235514v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Segreto & Lucas Principe & Alexandra Desormeaux & Marco Torre & Laura Tomassetti & Patrizio Tratzi & Valerio Paolini & Francesco Petracchini, 2020. "Trends in Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Across Europe—A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Thomas Bauwens, 2015. "Propriété coopérative et acceptabilité sociale de l’éolien terrestre," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 59-70.
    3. Berka, Anna L. & Creamer, Emily, 2018. "Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: A review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3400-3419.
    4. Valérie Lesgards & Salvatore Stelitano, 2022. "Crowdfunding et transition énergétique : analyse empirique des plateformes de financement participatif des projets d’énergies renouvelables en France," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 79-103.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bauwens, Thomas, 2019. "Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: Findings and policy implications from Flanders," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 841-852.
    2. Wang, Jianjun & Liu, Fang & Li, Li & Zhang, Jian, 2022. "More than innovativeness: Comparing residents’ motivations for participating renewable energy communities in different innovation segments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 552-563.
    3. Buenau, K.E. & Sather, N.K. & Arkema, K.K., 2025. "A marine energy and ecosystem service framework for coastal communities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Hübner, Gundula & Leschinger, Valentin & Müller, Florian J.Y. & Pohl, Johannes, 2023. "Broadening the social acceptance of wind energy – An Integrated Acceptance Model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Pons-Seres de Brauwer, C. & Cohen, J.J., 2020. "Analysing the potential of citizen-financed community renewable energy to drive Europe's low-carbon energy transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Petr Hlavacek & Vladim r Skaln k, 2021. "The Implementation of Smart Energy into Transformation of the Rural Area: The Use of Public Policies for Smart Villages Development," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 1-6.
    7. Solomon Eghosa Uhunamure & Clement Matasane & Trevor Uyi Omoruyi & Julieanna Powell-Turner, 2025. "Determinants of Consumer Willingness to Invest in Green Energy Solutions: Perspectives from South Africa," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Ryo Kohsaka & Satomi Kohyama, 2023. "Contested renewable energy sites due to landscape and socio-ecological barriers: Comparison of wind and solar power installation cases in Japan," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(7), pages 2619-2641, November.
    9. Altsitsiadis, E. & Kaiser, M. & Tsakas, A. & Kyriakidis, A. & Stamos, A., 2024. "Investigating the Regional and Individual Drivers of the Support for Renewable Energy Transition: The Role of Severe Material Deprivation," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2419, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    10. Radtke, Jörg, 2025. "E-participation in energy transitions: What does it mean? Chances and challenges within Germany's Energiewende," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    11. Frate, Cláudio Albuquerque & Brannstrom, Christian & de Morais, Marcus Vinícius Girão & Caldeira-Pires, Armando de Azevedo, 2019. "Procedural and distributive justice inform subjectivity regarding wind power: A case from Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 185-195.
    12. Madani, Seyyedreza & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2024. "Investment in vehicle-to-grid and distributed energy resources: Distributor versus prosumer perspectives and the impact of rate structures," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu & Siyami Alp Limoncuoglu & Muhittin Hakan Demir & Johannes Reichl & Katrin Burgstaller & Alessandro Sciullo & Edoardo Ferrero, 2021. "Legal Provisions and Market Conditions for Energy Communities in Austria, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, and Turkey: A Comparative Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-25, October.
    14. Remi Wacogne, 2024. "When Heritage and Landscape Values Are Confronted by Planned Infrastructures: A Glance at ‘Public Debate’ (‘Dibattito Pubblico’) Procedures in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-10, July.
    15. Eckert, Linus & Schemel, Benjamin & Stagl, Sigrid, 2024. "Gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz von Klimaschutzmaßnahmen: Erste Einblicke in die Ergebnisse," Ecological Economic Papers 47/2024, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    16. Christina E. Hoicka & Jessica Conroy & Anna Berka, 2021. "Reconfiguring actors and infrastructure in city renewable energy transitions: a regional perspective," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2021(06), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    17. Sperling, K. & Arler, F., 2020. "Local government innovation in the energy sector: A study of key actors’ strategies and arguments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    18. Satymov, Rasul & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Dadashi, Mojtaba & Lavidas, George & Breyer, Christian, 2024. "Techno-economic assessment of global and regional wave energy resource potentials and profiles in hourly resolution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    19. Bourdin, Sébastien & Delcayre, Hugo, 2024. "Does size matter? The effects of biomethane project size on social acceptability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    20. Koltunov, Maksym & De Vidovich, Lorenzo, 2025. "Energy communities in social sciences: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05235514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.