IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05235514.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les pionniers des communautés citoyennes d'énergie en France : Typologie, développement et perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Christine Eiller

    (EDF R&D SEQUOIA - EDF R&D - EDF R&D - EDF - EDF)

  • Valérie Lesgards

    (EDF R&D SEQUOIA - EDF R&D - EDF R&D - EDF - EDF)

Abstract

Cette communication traite des initiatives citoyennes dans les projets énergétiques, préexistantes à la réglementation européenne et française. Elle vise à identifier les motivations initiales des citoyens dans les projets ainsi que leur modèle d'organisation et d'implication. A partir du retour d'expérience des pionniers des communautés d'énergie, du recueil de leurs difficultés et de leurs succès sur la vie du projet, cette étude vise à répondre aux trois questions de recherches suivantes. i) Peut-on établir une typologie de projets citoyens nés au stade pré réglementaire ? Quels sont les fondamentaux de leur création et de leur constitution en termes d'objectifs, de gouvernance, de bénéfices attendus ? Il s'agit à ce stade de préciser l'ensemble des éléments du projet initial, de façon à établir une typologie des modèles de participation citoyenne. Le chapitre 3 est consacré à cette typologie. ii) Comment ces modèles ont-ils évolué dans le temps ? Quelle influence a eu la réglementation européenne et sa transposition dans le droit français sur leur évolution et sur leur dissémination ? Il convient d'examiner les résultats du projet, perçus par leur responsable, en termes de réalisation d'objectifs, de bénéfices escomptés et d'évolution. Le chapitre 3 traite également de ces questions. iii) Quels sont les facteurs de succès de ces communautés pionnières ? En particulier, comment résistent-elles aux aléas économiques et aux fluctuations des prix de l'énergie ? Le chapitre 4 identifie les facteurs qui facilitent le développement et la pérennité des communautés de citoyens.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Christine Eiller & Valérie Lesgards, 2025. "Les pionniers des communautés citoyennes d'énergie en France : Typologie, développement et perspectives," Post-Print hal-05235514, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05235514
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://edf.hal.science/hal-05235514v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://edf.hal.science/hal-05235514v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Segreto & Lucas Principe & Alexandra Desormeaux & Marco Torre & Laura Tomassetti & Patrizio Tratzi & Valerio Paolini & Francesco Petracchini, 2020. "Trends in Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Across Europe—A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Thomas Bauwens, 2015. "Propriété coopérative et acceptabilité sociale de l’éolien terrestre," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 59-70.
    3. Berka, Anna L. & Creamer, Emily, 2018. "Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: A review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3400-3419.
    4. Valérie Lesgards & Salvatore Stelitano, 2022. "Crowdfunding et transition énergétique : analyse empirique des plateformes de financement participatif des projets d’énergies renouvelables en France," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 79-103.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buenau, K.E. & Sather, N.K. & Arkema, K.K., 2025. "A marine energy and ecosystem service framework for coastal communities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Petr Hlavacek & Vladim r Skaln k, 2021. "The Implementation of Smart Energy into Transformation of the Rural Area: The Use of Public Policies for Smart Villages Development," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 1-6.
    3. Ryo Kohsaka & Satomi Kohyama, 2023. "Contested renewable energy sites due to landscape and socio-ecological barriers: Comparison of wind and solar power installation cases in Japan," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(7), pages 2619-2641, November.
    4. Radtke, Jörg, 2025. "E-participation in energy transitions: What does it mean? Chances and challenges within Germany's Energiewende," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    5. Frate, Cláudio Albuquerque & Brannstrom, Christian & de Morais, Marcus Vinícius Girão & Caldeira-Pires, Armando de Azevedo, 2019. "Procedural and distributive justice inform subjectivity regarding wind power: A case from Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 185-195.
    6. Eckert, Linus & Schemel, Benjamin & Stagl, Sigrid, 2024. "Gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz von Klimaschutzmaßnahmen: Erste Einblicke in die Ergebnisse," Ecological Economic Papers 47/2024, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    7. Sperling, K. & Arler, F., 2020. "Local government innovation in the energy sector: A study of key actors’ strategies and arguments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    8. Haider Mahmood & Muhammad Tanveer & Maham Furqan, 2021. "Rule of Law, Corruption Control, Governance, and Economic Growth in Managing Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Consumption in South Asia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Hoicka, Christina E. & Lowitzsch, Jens & Brisbois, Marie Claire & Kumar, Ankit & Ramirez Camargo, Luis, 2021. "Implementing a just renewable energy transition: Policy advice for transposing the new European rules for renewable energy communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Lisiak-Zielińska, Marta & Jałoszyńska, Sylwia & Borowiak, Klaudia & Budka, Anna & Dach, Jacek, 2023. "Perception of biogas plants: A public awareness and preference - A case study for the agricultural landscape," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    11. Neska, Ewa & Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna, 2022. "Conceptual design of energy market topologies for communities and their practical applications in EU: A comparison of three case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    12. Berka, Anna L. & Hoicka, Christina E. & Sperling, Karl, 2025. "The political economics of civic energy: A framework for comparative research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    13. Kubli, Merla & Puranik, Sanket, 2023. "A typology of business models for energy communities: Current and emerging design options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Bishal Bharadwaj & Franzisca Weder & Peta Ashworth, 2023. "More support for hydrogen export than its domestic application in Australia," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    15. Mariusz Kruczek & Malgorzata Markowska & Aikaterini Servou & Christos Roumpos & Eleni Mertiri & Priscilla Ernst & Jaroslaw Darmosz & Thomas Kempka, 2025. "Navigating Socio-Technical Challenges in Energy Efficiency: Case Studies on Hybrid Pumped-Hydropower Storage in Poland and Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-32, January.
    16. Haji Bashi, Mazaher & De Tommasi, Luciano & Le Cam, Andreea & Relaño, Lorena Sánchez & Lyons, Padraig & Mundó, Joana & Pandelieva-Dimova, Ivanka & Schapp, Henrik & Loth-Babut, Karolina & Egger, Christ, 2023. "A review and mapping exercise of energy community regulatory challenges in European member states based on a survey of collective energy actors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Hoicka, Christina E. & MacArthur, Julie L., 2018. "From tip to toes: Mapping community energy models in Canada and New Zealand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 162-174.
    18. Koga, H. & Bouzarovski, S. & Petrova, S., 2025. "Unsettling mainstream academic debates on community-based energy governance: Exploring the Japanese experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    19. Uchechukwu Nwaiwu & Matthew Leach & Lirong Liu & Valentine Seymour, 2025. "Decentralized Geothermal Energy for Electricity Access: Exploring Knowledge and Social Acceptance in Ebonyi State, Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-34, June.
    20. Radtke, Jörg & Ohlhorst, Dörte, 2021. "Community Energy in Germany – Bowling Alone in Elite Clubs?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05235514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.