IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05083845.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Strengthening the Corporate Governance System through Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Accounting Conservatism in an Emerging Market

Author

Listed:
  • Othman Gaga

    (Faculty of Economics and Management of Settat Hassan First University of Settat)

  • Karam Said

    (Faculty of Economics and Management of Settat Hassan First University of Settat)

  • Nasredine Fathelkhir

    (Faculty of Economics and Management of Settat Hassan First University of Settat)

Abstract

This article investigates the role of financial reporting quality as a mechanism for strengthening corporate governance in emerging markets. While most governance studies emphasize internal structures—particularly the board of directors—this research highlights the external disciplinary function of accounting conservatism as shaped by the firm's institutional environment. Drawing on the methodology developed by Khan & Watts (2009), we construct two firm-year-level scores that capture opposing reporting strategies: timely loss recognition (C_SCORE) and aggressive accounting (G_SCORE). Using a sample of 38 non-financial firms listed on the Casablanca Stock Exchange over the 2011–2021 period, the study explores how structural characteristics— grouped under the Investment Opportunity Set (IOS)—influence firms' accounting behaviors. Empirical estimations are conducted using Fama-MacBeth regressions, Pooled OLS, and FGLS methods to ensure robustness. The findings reveal that two IOS variables—the market-to-book ratio and financial leverage—are significantly associated with conservative reporting practices. Firms with high growth opportunities and elevated debt levels tend to adopt more prudent accounting strategies, characterized by faster loss recognition and limited anticipation of gains. In contrast, firm size does not appear to be a relevant determinant in the Moroccan context. Additionally, the analysis shows a marked improvement in financial reporting quality after 2017, coinciding with regulatory reforms, including the establishment of the Moroccan Capital Market Authority (AMMC) and the adoption of Circular No. 03/19. The study contributes to the literature by emphasizing financial reporting quality as a governance mechanism shaped by institutional forces. It also demonstrates the relevance of the Khan & Watts model in an emerging market context and underlines the active role regulators can play in enhancing accounting discipline. Finally, the paper opens new avenues for cross-country comparisons and extensions into non-financial reporting domains.

Suggested Citation

  • Othman Gaga & Karam Said & Nasredine Fathelkhir, 2025. "Strengthening the Corporate Governance System through Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Accounting Conservatism in an Emerging Market," Post-Print hal-05083845, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05083845
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15514408
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05083845v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05083845v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.15514408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anwer S. Ahmed & Scott Duellman, 2013. "Managerial Overconfidence and Accounting Conservatism," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 1-30, March.
    2. David Easley & Soeren Hvidkjaer & Maureen O'Hara, 2002. "Is Information Risk a Determinant of Asset Returns?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(5), pages 2185-2221, October.
    3. Smith, Clifford Jr. & Watts, Ross L., 1992. "The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 263-292, December.
    4. Wittenberg-Moerman, Regina, 2008. "The role of information asymmetry and financial reporting quality in debt trading: Evidence from the secondary loan market," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2-3), pages 240-260, December.
    5. Valeri V. Nikolaev, 2010. "Debt Covenants and Accounting Conservatism," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 137-176, March.
    6. Anwer S. Ahmed & Scott Duellman, 2011. "Evidence on the role of accounting conservatism in monitoring managers’ investment decisions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 51(3), pages 609-633, September.
    7. Valeri V. Nikolaev, 2010. "Debt Covenants and Accounting Conservatism," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 51-89, March.
    8. Chao Chen & Song Zhu, 2013. "Financial Reporting Quality, Debt Maturity, and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(S4), pages 236-253, September.
    9. Khan, Mozaffar & Watts, Ross L., 2009. "Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2-3), pages 132-150, December.
    10. Fama, Eugene F & MacBeth, James D, 1973. "Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 607-636, May-June.
    11. Zhang, Jieying, 2008. "The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-54, March.
    12. Ball, Ray & Shivakumar, Lakshmanan, 2005. "Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 83-128, February.
    13. Roychowdhury, Sugata & Watts, Ross L., 2007. "Asymmetric timeliness of earnings, market-to-book and conservatism in financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 2-31, September.
    14. Ball, Ray & Kothari, S. P. & Robin, Ashok, 2000. "Corrigendum to "The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings"; [Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (2000) 1-51]," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 241-241, October.
    15. Ball, Ray & Kothari, S. P. & Robin, Ashok, 2000. "The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-51, February.
    16. Basu, Sudipta, 1997. "The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 3-37, December.
    17. Todd A. Gormley & Bong Hwan Kim & Xiumin Martin, 2012. "Do Firms Adjust Their Timely Loss Recognition in Response to Changes in the Banking Industry?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 159-196, March.
    18. Bushman, Robert M. & Piotroski, Joseph D., 2006. "Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting: The influence of legal and political institutions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 107-148, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuying Xie, 2015. "Confusion over Accounting Conservatism: A Critical Review," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 25(2), pages 204-216, June.
    2. Ha, Joohyung, 2019. "Agency costs of free cash flow and conditional conservatism," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Dmitri Byzalov & Sudipta Basu, 2016. "Conditional conservatism and disaggregated bad news indicators in accrual models," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 859-897, September.
    4. Araceli Mora & Martin Walker, 2015. "The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 620-650, August.
    5. Khalifa, Mariem & Trabelsi, Samir & Matoussi, Hamadi, 2022. "Leverage, R&D expenditures, and accounting conservatism: Evidence from technology firms," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 285-304.
    6. Hsin-Yi Chi & Tzu-Ching Weng & Guang-Zheng Chen & Shu-Ping Chen, 2019. "Do Political Connections Affect the Conservative Financial Reporting of Family Firms?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Jagadison K. Aier & Long Chen & Mikhail Pevzner, 2014. "Debtholders’ Demand for Conservatism: Evidence from Changes in Directors’ Fiduciary Duties," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 993-1027, December.
    8. Kim, Jaewoo, 2018. "Asymmetric timely loss recognition, adverse shocks to external capital, and underinvestment: Evidence from the collapse of the junk bond market," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 148-168.
    9. Chengru Hu & Wei Jiang, 2019. "Managerial risk incentives and accounting conservatism," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 781-813, April.
    10. Richard Barker & Anne McGeachin, 2015. "An Analysis of Concepts and Evidence on the Question of Whether IFRS Should be Conservative," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(2), pages 169-207, June.
    11. Chan, Ann L.-C. & Hsu, Audrey W.-H. & Lee, Edward, 2015. "Mandatory adoption of IFRS and timely loss recognition across Europe: The effect of corporate finance incentives," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 70-82.
    12. J. Richard Dietrich & Karl A. Muller & Edward J. Riedl, 2023. "On the validity of asymmetric timeliness measures of accounting conservatism," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 2150-2195, December.
    13. Todd A. Gormley & Bong Hwan Kim & Xiumin Martin, 2012. "Do Firms Adjust Their Timely Loss Recognition in Response to Changes in the Banking Industry?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 159-196, March.
    14. Sudipta Basu & Yi Liang, 2019. "Director–Liability–Reduction Laws and Conditional Conservatism," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 889-917, September.
    15. Ding, Rong & Jacoby, Gady & Liu, Mingzhi & Wang, Tingting & Wu, Zhenyu, 2024. "Does climate risk shape firms’ accounting conservatism?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    16. Urooj Khan & Alvis K. Lo, 2019. "Bank Lending Standards and Borrower Accounting Conservatism," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(11), pages 5337-5359, November.
    17. Inès Kammoun & Samah Rebai Azouz & Walid Khoufi, 2016. "Les déterminants du conservatisme comptable conditionnel dans le contexte français," Post-Print hal-01901131, HAL.
    18. Inder K. Khurana & Changjiang Wang, 2015. "Debt Maturity Structure and Accounting Conservatism," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1-2), pages 167-203, January.
    19. Chen, Jeff Zeyun & Lobo, Gerald J. & Wang, Yanyan & Yu, Lisheng, 2013. "Loan collateral and financial reporting conservatism: Chinese evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 4989-5006.
    20. Banker, Rajiv D. & Basu, Sudipta & Byzalov, Dmitri & Chen, Janice Y.S., 2016. "The confounding effect of cost stickiness on conservatism estimates," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 203-220.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate governance; Financial reporting quality; Accounting conservatism; Timely loss recognition; Institutional environment;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05083845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.