IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04846458.html

Spatial disparities in household waste collection in France: an analysis at subregional level
[Disparités spatiales de collecte des déchets ménagers en France : une analyse à l'échelle des départements]

Author

Listed:
  • Aissatou Ndimblane

    (Territoires - Territoires - AgroParisTech - VAS - VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne)

  • Olivier Aznar

    (Territoires - Territoires - AgroParisTech - VAS - VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne)

  • Kassoum Ayouba

    (Territoires - Territoires - AgroParisTech - VAS - VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne, CESAER - Centre d'économie et de sociologie rurales appliquées à l'agriculture et aux espaces ruraux - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Dijon - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement)

Abstract

We study differences in waste collection performance between French subregions (French departments) and the factors associated with these disparities to identify levers to improve waste collection. Using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering, we create a four-class typology of subregions according to their quantities of waste collected per capita, and relate the differences in waste collection performance to economic and sociodemographic variables. Our results show that the four-class of subregions identified have different territorial characteristics, especially in terms of density, degree of urbanization, poverty rate, tourism and level of education. They show, in particular, that the subregions where separate collection is less developed are, on average, very urban with a high population density. They are also characterized by higher than average poverty rate and higher level of education. Conversely, subregions with quantities of unsorted waste per capita below the average are less urbanized and have a lower density. These subregions are also characterized by low tourism, a low level of education, and a lower than average poverty rate. The subregions with quantities of unsorted waste per capita higher than the national average are, more urbanized and more touristy than all the subregions. These results highlight that there is no single solution when it comes to local waste management policies. The implementation of instruments and policies must be adapted to the particularities of each territory. Based on these results, we suggest ways of improving local public waste management policies. We propose the promotion of waste prevention and the deployment of separate collection of biowaste, which represent important solutions to support behaviors favorable to waste reduction. We also identify raising citizen awareness and economic incentives, as levers that could improve waste management.

Suggested Citation

  • Aissatou Ndimblane & Olivier Aznar & Kassoum Ayouba, 2024. "Spatial disparities in household waste collection in France: an analysis at subregional level [Disparités spatiales de collecte des déchets ménagers en France : une analyse à l'échelle des départements]," Post-Print hal-04846458, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04846458
    DOI: 10.3917/reru.245.0693
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04846458v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04846458v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/reru.245.0693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ida Ferrara & Paul Missios, 2005. "Recycling and Waste Diversion Effectiveness: Evidence from Canada," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 30(2), pages 221-238, February.
    2. Bertrand Zuindeau, 2005. "Analyse économique des disparités écologiques spatiales : Une étude à partir des départements français," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(3), pages 331-354.
    3. Matthieu Glachant, 2005. "La politique nationale de tarification du service des déchets ménagers en présence de politiques municipales hétérogènes," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 167(1), pages 85-100.
    4. Olle Hage & Krister Sandberg & Patrik Söderholm & Christer Berglund, 2018. "The regional heterogeneity of household recycling: a spatial-econometric analysis of Swedish plastic packing waste," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 245-267, October.
    5. Bertrand Zuindeau, 2005. "Analyse économique des disparités écologiques spatiales : une étude à partir des départements français," Post-Print halshs-00200654, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Houévoh Amandine R. Gnonlonfin, 2016. "An evaluation of French municipal solid waste pricing system," Working Papers 2016.18, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    2. Jean Bonnet & Eva Coll-Martínez & Patricia Renou-Maissant, 2021. "Evaluating Sustainable Development by Composite Index: Evidence from French Departments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Maarten A. Allers & Corine Hoeben, 2010. "Effects of Unit-Based Garbage Pricing: A Differences-in-Differences Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 45(3), pages 405-428, March.
    4. Yingqian Lin & Shuaikun Lu & Guanmao Yin & Baolong Yuan, 2025. "Policy Tools, Policy Perception, and Compliance with Urban Waste Sorting Policies: Evidence from 34 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Roberto Zoboli, 2008. "Waste Generation, Incineration and Landfill Diversion. De-coupling Trends, Socio-Economic Drivers and Policy Effectiveness in the EU," Working Papers 2008.94, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    6. Romano, Giulia & Molinos-Senante, María & Carosi, Laura & Llanquileo-Melgarejo, Paula & Sala-Garrido, Ramón & Mocholi-Arce, Manuel, 2021. "Assessing the dynamic eco-efficiency of Italian municipalities by accounting for the ownership of the entrusted waste utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Joacim Rosenlund & Miralem Helmefalk & Sofie Stenfelt & Adam Palmquist, 2025. "Levelling up the Recycling Experience: Gamification of Recycling through an Innovative Recycling Station," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 1983-2007, June.
    8. Weber, Gabriel & Cabras, Ignazio & Calaf-Forn, Maria & Puig-Ventosa, Ignasi & D'Alisa, Giacomo, 2019. "Promoting Waste Degrowth and Environmental Justice at a Local Level: The Case of Unit-Pricing Schemes in Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 306-317.
    9. Diego Ambasz & Anshuman Gupta & Harry A Patrinos, 2025. "A review of human development and environmental outcomes," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 45(4), pages 1687-1709.
    10. Brekke, Kjell Arne & Kipperberg, Gorm & Nyborg, Karine, 2009. "Reluctant Recyclers: Social Interaction in Responsibility Ascription," Memorandum 16/2007, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    11. Gorm Kipperberg, 2007. "A Comparison of Household Recycling Behaviors in Norway and the United States," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 36(2), pages 215-235, February.
    12. Meyer, Andrew, 2015. "Does education increase pro-environmental behavior? Evidence from Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 108-121.
    13. Brandon C. Koford & Glenn C. Blomquist & David M. Hardesty & Kenneth R. Troske & Margaret Hughes & Fred Morgan, 2012. "Estimating Consumer Willingness to Supply and Willingness to Pay for Curbside Recycling," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(4), pages 745-763.
    14. Gorm Kipperberg & Douglas Larson, 2012. "Heterogeneous Preferences for Community Recycling Programs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 53(4), pages 577-604, December.
    15. Liange Zhao & Jianfeng Zou & Zhijian Zhang, 2020. "Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Coralie Hellwig & Greta Häggblom-Kronlöf & Kim Bolton & Kamran Rousta, 2019. "Household Waste Sorting and Engagement in Everyday Life Occupations After Migration—A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-29, August.
    17. Brian Chi-ang Lin & Siqi Zheng & Ankinée Kirakozian, 2016. "One Without The Other? Behavioural And Incentive Policies For Household Waste Management," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 526-551, July.
    18. Jean Bonnet & Eva Coll-Martinez & Patricia Renou-Maissant, 2019. "Sustainable development. A Comparative Analysis of the Performance of French departments," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 2019-06, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
    19. Qin Yuan & Ruiqi Wang & Huanchen Tang & Xin Ma & Xinyue Zeng, 2024. "A study on the potential of higher education in reducing carbon intensity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Mats Wilhelmsson, 2022. "About the Importance of Planning the Location of Recycling Stations in the Urban Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04846458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.