IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04816812.html

Do we really judge the book by its cover? Idea selection during start-up week-ends

Author

Listed:
  • Guy Parmentier

    (UGA INP IAE - Grenoble Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes, CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • S. Le Loarne-Lemaire

    (GEM Recherche - EESC-GEM - Grenoble Ecole de Management)

  • M. Maxime Mellard

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

This article aims to identify the factors that influence the evaluation of an idea beyond its intrinsic values, especially those that relate to the presentation of the idea. With reference to a review of research conducted in the fields of psycho-sociology and psychology and using a qualitative comparative approach, the analysis of 57 pitches of entrepreneurial ideas during two start-up weekends shows that ideas receive the highest evaluation when they are judged to be the best in terms of novelty, feasibility, and relevance. However, our results also show that mastery by ideators of the basics of pitch presentation—especially clear enunciation—is also a necessary condition for acceptance of the idea by the audience. The paper seeks to contribute to the literature by identifying the most favorable configurations for a positive evaluation of an entrepreneurial idea in this type of innovation contest.

Suggested Citation

  • Guy Parmentier & S. Le Loarne-Lemaire & M. Maxime Mellard, 2021. "Do we really judge the book by its cover? Idea selection during start-up week-ends," Post-Print hal-04816812, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04816812
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04816812v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04816812v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin Clark, 2008. "The impact of entrepreneurs' oral ‘pitch’ presentation skills on business angels' initial screening investment decisions," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 257-279, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Michael Siering, 2019. "The recipe of successful crowdfunding campaigns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 661-679, December.
    2. Clingingsmith, David & Shane, Scott, 2017. "Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States," SocArXiv yzpvf, Center for Open Science.
    3. David Clingingsmith & Scott Shane, 2018. "Training Aspiring Entrepreneurs to Pitch Experienced Investors: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the United States," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5164-5179, November.
    4. Werner Liebregts & Pourya Darnihamedani & Eric Postma & Martin Atzmueller, 2020. "The promise of social signal processing for research on decision-making in entrepreneurial contexts," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 589-605, October.
    5. Manuel Kaiser & Andreas Kuckertz, 2024. "Bibliometrically mapping the research field of entrepreneurial communication: where we stand and where we need to go," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2087-2120, December.
    6. Mojca Svetek, 2023. "The Role of Entrepreneurs’ Perceived Competence and Cooperativeness in Early-Stage Financing," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2047-2076, November.
    7. Livia Boerner & Thomas Fritz & Bernd Frick, 2025. "Investing in people, not in products: how age, gender, ethnicity, and attractiveness of entrepreneurial teams influence the decision-making of angel investors in Germany," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 37-74, January.
    8. repec:wsi:acsxxx:v:21:y:2019:i:08:n:s1363919619500105 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Carpentier, Cécile & Suret, Jean-Marc, 2015. "Angel group members' decision process and rejection criteria: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 808-821.
    10. Thanh Huynh, 2016. "Early-stage fundraising of university spin-offs: a study through demand-site perspectives," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 345-367, October.
    11. Kourosh Shafi, 2021. "Investors’ evaluation criteria in equity crowdfunding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 3-37, January.
    12. Ana Paula Cusolito & Ernest Dautovic & David McKenzie, 2021. "Can Government Intervention Make Firms More Investment Ready? A Randomized Experiment in the Western Balkans," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 103(3), pages 428-442, July.
    13. Lerner, Daniel A., 2016. "Behavioral disinhibition and nascent venturing: Relevance and initial effects on potential resource providers," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 234-252.
    14. Brett Anthony White & John Dumay, 2020. "The angel investment decision: insights from Australian business angels," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 3133-3162, September.
    15. Dinna Charisma & Bambang Hermanto & Margo Purnomo & Tetty Herawati, 2025. "Building Business Resilience Through Strategic Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Culinary Micro-Enterprises in Bandung During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    16. Jean S. Clarke & Nicholas Llewellyn & Joep Cornelissen & Rowena Viney, 2021. "Gesture Analysis and Organizational Research : The Development and Application of a Protocol for Naturalistic Settings," Post-Print hal-02299462, HAL.
    17. Yenchun Jim Wu & Chih-Hung Yuan & Chia-I Pan, 2018. "Entrepreneurship Education: An Experimental Study with Information and Communication Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    18. Indu Khurana & Daniel J. Lee, 2023. "Gender bias in high stakes pitching: an NLP approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 485-502, February.
    19. Michael Marcin Kunz & Ulrich Bretschneider & Max Erler & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2017. "An empirical investigation of signaling in reward-based crowdfunding," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 425-461, September.
    20. Aaron H. Anglin & Shane W. Reid & Jeremy C. Short, 2023. "More Than One Way to Tell a Story: A Configurational Approach to Storytelling in Crowdfunding," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 461-494, March.
    21. Bergner, Sören Martin & Bräutigam, Rainer & Evers, Maria Theresia & Spengel, Christoph, 2017. "The use of SME tax incentives in the European Union," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-006, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04816812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.