IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04426296.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unpacking Social Order: Towards a Novel Framework that Goes Beyond Organizations, Institutions, and Networks Forthcoming in Critical Sociology

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Grothe-Hammer

    (NTNU Samfunnsforskning AS / NTNU Social Research - NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology [Trondheim] - NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Héloïse Berkowitz

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

Abstract

This article addresses one of the oldest, most fundamental questions: how social order comes about. Many established conceptions of social order either tend to overemphasize one specific form of social order like institutions or networks thereby losing sight of others, or subscribe to a single binary definition often distinguishing between spontaneous and organized social order. Although we do not deny the analytical fruitfulness of these approaches, we argue that they fall short when it comes to fully grasping certain social phenomena. Against this backdrop, we expand existing approaches by accounting for the multi-dimensionality of social order. Drawing on decisional organization theory, we present a theorization of social order that outlines four properties: ontology (system or structure), determination (decided or non-decided), changeability (decidable or non-decidable), and acceptance (accepted or contested). As we will show, this framework offers a fine-grained understanding of social orders on a more generalized level, accounting for the complex, relational and processual nature of social orders. This approach allows us to move beyond established categorizations of social phenomena into, e.g., institutions or networks, and to put the emphasis on properties of social orders, the identification of tipping points, the unpacking of complexity, and the analysis of potential incompatibilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Grothe-Hammer & Héloïse Berkowitz, 2024. "Unpacking Social Order: Towards a Novel Framework that Goes Beyond Organizations, Institutions, and Networks Forthcoming in Critical Sociology," Post-Print hal-04426296, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04426296
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04426296v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04426296v2/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean‐Sébastien Guy, 2018. "‘Niklas Luhmann before Relational Sociology: The Cybernetics Roots of Systems Theory’," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 856-868, November.
    2. Leonhard Dobusch & Dennis Schoeneborn, 2015. "Fluidity, Identity, and Organizationality: The Communicative Constitution of Anonymous," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(8), pages 1005-1035, December.
    3. Luban, Daniel, 2020. "What Is Spontaneous Order?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(1), pages 68-80, February.
    4. Niklas Luhmann, 2020. "Organization, membership and the formalization of behavioural expectations," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 425-449, May.
    5. Ahrne, Göran & Brunsson, Nils, 2005. "Organizations and meta-organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 429-449, December.
    6. Grothe-Hammer, Michael, 2019. "Organization without actorhood: Exploring a neglected phenomenon," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 325-338.
    7. Williamson, Oliver E, 1991. "Economic Institutions: Spontaneous and Intentional Governance," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(0), pages 159-187, Special I.
    8. Hall, Peter A. & Taylor, Rosemary C. R., 1996. "Political science and the three new institutionalisms," MPIfG Discussion Paper 96/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Grothe-Hammer & Héloïse Berkowitz & Olivier Berthod, 2022. "Decisional organization theory: towards an integrated framework of organization," Post-Print hal-03699112, HAL.
    2. Héloïse Berkowitz & Nils Brunsson & Michael Grothe-Hammer & Mikaela Sundberg & Bertrand Valiorgue, 2022. "Meta-Organizations: A Clarification and a Way Forward," Post-Print hal-03685386, HAL.
    3. Héloïse Berkowitz & Sanne Bor, 2022. "Meta-organization as partial organization: An integrated framework of organizationality and decisionality," Post-Print hal-03717158, HAL.
    4. Botzem, Sebastian & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2008. "Transnational institution building as public-private interaction: the case of standard setting on the Internet and in corporate financial reporting," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 36535, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Järvi, Kati & Almpanopoulou, Argyro & Ritala, Paavo, 2018. "Organization of knowledge ecosystems: Prefigurative and partial forms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1523-1537.
    6. Ahrne, Göran & Brunsson, Nils & Seidl, David, 2016. "Resurrecting organization by going beyond organizations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 93-101.
    7. Pierre Garaudel, 2020. "Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations," Post-Print halshs-02474817, HAL.
    8. Héloïse Berkowitz & Antoine Souchaud, 2019. "(Self-)Regulation of Sharing Economy Platforms Through Partial Meta-organizing," Post-Print hal-02528015, HAL.
    9. Berkowitz, Heloise, 2019. "An ontology of meta-organization: Variations in attributes, functions and profiles," OSF Preprints kc4a3, Center for Open Science.
    10. Ghita Dragsdahl Lauritzen, 2020. "Looking beyond formal organization: How public managers organize voluntary work by adapting to deviance," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 467-481, May.
    11. Michael Grothe‐Hammer & Anders la Cour, 2020. "Organization and membership: Introduction to the Special Issue," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 419-424, May.
    12. Garaudel, Pierre, 2020. "Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).
    13. Heloise Berkowitz & Antoine Souchaud, 2019. "(Self-)Regulation of Sharing Economy Platforms Through Partial Meta-organizing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 961-976, November.
    14. Michael Grothe‐Hammer, 2020. "Membership and contributorship in organizations: An update of modern systems theory," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 482-495, May.
    15. Markus Lederer, 2012. "Market making via regulation: The role of the state in carbon markets," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), pages 524-544, December.
    16. Yefimov, Vladimir, 2009. "Comparative historical institutional analysis of German, English and American economics," MPRA Paper 48173, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Richard Hyman & Rebecca Gumbrell-McCormick, 2020. "(How) can international trade union organisations be democratic?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(3), pages 253-272, August.
    18. Maarten Hillebrandt, 2017. "Transparency as a Platform for Institutional Politics: The Case of the Council of the European Union," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 62-74.
    19. Broich, Tobias, 2017. "Do authoritarian regimes receive more Chinese development finance than democratic ones? Empirical evidence for Africa," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 180-207.
    20. Hamza El Kaddouri & Modar Ajeeb, 2021. "The introduction of legal audit within French universities: The impact on the managerial latitude of managers [L'introduction de l'audit légal au sein des universités françaises : l'impact sur la l," Post-Print halshs-04246174, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04426296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.