IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02421272.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Relativiser ses intérêts pour prendre en compte les parties prenantes des risques

Author

Listed:
  • Jérémy Eydieux

    (Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology, CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019], UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

  • Stéphanie Tillement

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes, IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Benoît Journé

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes, IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

Abstract

Dans les industries à risques, la gestion des parties prenantes des risques (travailleurs, populations…) est considérée comme une contribution de la gouvernance des risques à la fiabilité organisationnelle (Perrow, 1999). Dans le champ de la gestion des parties prenantes, les approches pragmatistes soulignent l'importance de la manière d'animer le dialogue, mais sans explorer la manière dont chacun met en suspens une partie de ses intérêts. Nous visons les questions suivantes : Comment des acteurs contribuant à une relation contrôleur/contrôlé mettent-ils en suspens leurs intérêts ? Pour prendre en compte quelles parties prenantes (travailleurs, populations…) ? Nous étudions un cas d'évaluation d'une démonstration de sûreté par l'IRSN de 2010 à 2011. Nous avons procédé à une collecte de documents complétée d'entretiens, et avons analysé le corpus à l'aide du logiciel Cytoscape pour répertorier et analyser les relations entre textes. Nos résultats montrent que la relativisation du récit que les acteurs font de leur activité est plus utile pour gérer les relations inter-organisationnelles, et la relativisation de l'hypothèse que l'existence d'organisations de contrôle et d'expertise va de soi est plus utilisée pour les relations intra-organisationnelles.

Suggested Citation

  • Jérémy Eydieux & Stéphanie Tillement & Benoît Journé, 2019. "Relativiser ses intérêts pour prendre en compte les parties prenantes des risques," Post-Print hal-02421272, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02421272
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02421272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02421272/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew C. Wicks & R. Edward Freeman, 1998. "Organization Studies and the New Pragmatism: Positivism, Anti-positivism, and the Search for Ethics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 123-140, April.
    2. Damien Mourey, 2018. "Coordination et coopération des supply chains . Un processus dialogique, créatif et résistible qui s’accomplit chemin faisant," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(8), pages 125-141.
    3. Philippe Lorino & Damien Mourey, 2013. "The experience of time in the inter-organizing inquiry: A present thickened by dialog and situations," Post-Print halshs-01896861, HAL.
    4. Lorino, Philippe & Mourey, Damien, 2013. "The experience of time in the inter-organizing inquiry: A present thickened by dialog and situations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 48-62.
    5. Kenji Kushida, 2014. "The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster and the Democratic Party of Japan," Japanese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 29-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jérémy Eydieux, 2020. "Articuler anticipation et résilience pour gouverner les risques des démantèlements," Post-Print hal-03454706, HAL.
    2. Jérémy Eydieux & Stéphanie Tillement & Benoît Journé, 2020. "A pragmatist approach to audit practices: two cases of technical dialog from nuclear risk governance in France," Post-Print halshs-03721410, HAL.
    3. Jérémy Eydieux & Stéphanie Tillement & Benoît Journé, 2016. "Élaboration des démonstrations et des évaluations de sûreté : une approche pragmatiste," Post-Print hal-01546183, HAL.
    4. Robert Hrelja & Fredrik Pettersson & Stig Westerdahl, 2016. "The Qualities Needed for a Successful Collaboration: A Contribution to the Conceptual Understanding of Collaboration for Efficient Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Marie-Noëlle Albert & Nadia Lazzari Dodeler & Emmanuel Guy, 2016. "From a Seafarer’s Career Management to the Management of Interwoven Sea- and Shore-Based Careers," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440166, February.
    6. Jérémy Eydieux, 2018. "Valuation and Risk Management: Anticipation and Resilience," Post-Print hal-01817415, HAL.
    7. Godé, Cécile & Lebraty, Jean-Fabrice, 2015. "Experience feedback as an enabler of coordination: An aerobatic military team case," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 424-436.
    8. Anaïs Boutru Creveuil, 2021. "Legitimation of temporary organizations: The case of a strategic alliance in the French retail sector," Post-Print halshs-03157384, HAL.
    9. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2023. "Stakeholder theory: Toward a classical institutional economics perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88.
    10. Jill Brown & William Forster, 2013. "CSR and Stakeholder Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 301-312, January.
    11. Marie-José Avenier & Catherine Thomas, 2015. "Finding one's way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks [Se frayer un chemin parmi les différentes recommandation," Post-Print halshs-01491454, HAL.
    12. Michael J. Zyphur & Dean C. Pierides, 2020. "Making Quantitative Research Work: From Positivist Dogma to Actual Social Scientific Inquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 49-62, November.
    13. Mustafa Kavas & Paula Jarzabkowski & Amit Nigam, 2020. "Islamic Family Business: The Constitutive Role of Religion in Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(4), pages 689-700, May.
    14. Assâad El Akremi & Inès Dhaouadi & Jacques Igalens, 2008. "La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise sous l’éclairage des critical management studies:vers un nouveau cadre d’analyse de la relation entreprise-société," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(3), pages 65-94, September.
    15. Moshe Farjoun & Christopher Ansell & Arjen Boin, 2015. "PERSPECTIVE—Pragmatism in Organization Studies: Meeting the Challenges of a Dynamic and Complex World," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1787-1804, December.
    16. Gita Surie & Allan Ashley, 2008. "Integrating Pragmatism and Ethics in Entrepreneurial Leadership for Sustainable Value Creation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 235-246, August.
    17. Sophie Bacq & Ruth V. Aguilera, 2022. "Stakeholder Governance for Responsible Innovation: A Theory of Value Creation, Appropriation, and Distribution," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 29-60, January.
    18. Tony J. Watson, 2011. "Ethnography, Reality, and Truth: The Vital Need for Studies of ‘How Things Work’ in Organizations and Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 202-217, January.
    19. Oluwasegun Oluwaseyi Seriki, 2020. "Looking through the African lenses: a critical exploration of the CSR activities of Chinese International Construction Companies (CICCs) in Africa," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. A. Georges L. Romme & Gerard Endenburg, 2006. "Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 287-297, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02421272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.