IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02078872.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Price of Anarchy for Centralising or Decentralising Freight Transport Organisation Through Serious Gaming

Author

Listed:
  • Mariam Lafkihi

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Shenle Pan

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Eric Ballot

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Centralisation and decentralisation are the two common organisations in freight transport. The first relies on a central authority who optimises and establishes transport plans for all carriers for global-interest, while the second lets carriers optimise their own transport plans for their self-interest. The outcome-efficiency and effectiveness-could be different. This paper aims to use the concept of Price of Anarchy (PoA) to compare the outcome of the two organisations. Due to the complexity of actual freight transport market, this paper adapts the gamification methodology to investigate the two organisations. A freight transport game was developed for simulation. The outcome of the two simulated organisations-centralisation or decentralisation-are then compared. The results show that the centralisation outperforms in terms of global efficiency and effectiveness; while decentralisation is better individual incentive. However, the PoA varies depending on information revealed. Copyright © 2019 IFAC

Suggested Citation

  • Mariam Lafkihi & Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot, 2019. "The Price of Anarchy for Centralising or Decentralising Freight Transport Organisation Through Serious Gaming," Post-Print hal-02078872, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02078872
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-02078872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-02078872/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2018. "Collaborative vehicle routing: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 1-12.
    2. Ye, Yu-Sen & Ma, Zu-Jun & Dai, Ying, 2016. "The price of anarchy in competitive reverse supply chains with quality-dependent price-only contracts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 86-107.
    3. Li, Junsong & Rong, Gang & Feng, Yiping, 2015. "Request selection and exchange approach for carrier collaboration based on auction of a single request," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 23-39.
    4. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2007. "The Price of Anarchy in Supply Chains: Quantifying the Efficiency of Price-Only Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(8), pages 1249-1268, August.
    5. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl, 2016. "Request evaluation strategies for carriers in auction-based collaborations," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 3-23, January.
    6. Lori Houghtalen & Özlem Ergun & Joel Sokol, 2011. "Designing Mechanisms for the Management of Carrier Alliances," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 465-482, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kong, Xiang T.R. & Kang, Kai & Zhong, Ray Y. & Luo, Hao & Xu, Su Xiu, 2021. "Cyber physical system-enabled on-demand logistics trading," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Briand, Martin & Franklin, Rod & Lafkihi, Mariam, 2022. "A dynamic routing protocol with payments for the Physical Internet: A simulation with learning agents," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lyu, Xiaohui & Chen, Haoxun & Wang, Nengmin & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "A multi-round exchange mechanism for carrier collaboration in less than truckload transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 38-59.
    2. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F. & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2020. "Pushing frontiers in auction-based transport collaborations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Lai, Minghui & Cai, Xiaoqiang & Hu, Qian, 2017. "An iterative auction for carrier collaboration in truckload pickup and delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 60-80.
    4. Karaca, Utku & Birbil, Ş. İlker & Aydın, Nurşen & Mullaoğlu, Gizem, 2023. "Masking primal and dual models for data privacy in network revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 818-831.
    5. Zhang, Qihuan & Wang, Ziteng & Huang, Min & Yu, Yang & Fang, Shu-Cherng, 2022. "Heterogeneous multi-depot collaborative vehicle routing problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1-20.
    6. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl, 2021. "The Prisoners’ Dilemma in collaborative carriers’ request selection," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 73-87, March.
    7. Nassim Mrabti & Nadia Hamani & Laurent Delahoche, 2022. "A Comprehensive Literature Review on Sustainable Horizontal Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-38, September.
    8. Arslan, Okan & Archetti, Claudia & Jabali, Ola & Laporte, Gilbert & Grazia Speranza, Maria, 2020. "Minimum cost network design in strategic alliances," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl & Sarah Wieser, 2021. "Assignment constraints in shared transportation services," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 513-539, October.
    10. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2018. "Collaborative vehicle routing: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 1-12.
    11. Guo, Chaojie & Thompson, Russell G. & Foliente, Greg & Kong, Xiang T.R., 2021. "An auction-enabled collaborative routing mechanism for omnichannel on-demand logistics through transshipment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    12. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl, 2018. "Centralized bundle generation in auction-based collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(3), pages 613-635, July.
    13. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F. & Savelsbergh, Martin, 2020. "The value of information in auction-based carrier collaborations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Los, Johan & Schulte, Frederik & Spaan, Matthijs T.J. & Negenborn, Rudy R., 2020. "The value of information sharing for platform-based collaborative vehicle routing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Simai He & Jay Sethuraman & Xuan Wang & Jiawei Zhang, 2017. "A NonCooperative Approach to Cost Allocation in Joint Replenishment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1562-1573, December.
    16. Santiago R. Balseiro & Ozan Candogan & Huseyin Gurkan, 2021. "Multistage Intermediation in Display Advertising," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 714-730, May.
    17. Panos Kouvelis & Wenhui Zhao, 2012. "Financing the Newsvendor: Supplier vs. Bank, and the Structure of Optimal Trade Credit Contracts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 566-580, June.
    18. Rau, Philipp & Spinler, Stefan, 2017. "Alliance formation in a cooperative container shipping game: Performance of a real options investment approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 155-175.
    19. Justiani Sally & Wibowo Budhi S., 2022. "The Economic and Environmental Benefits of Collaborative Pick-Up in Urban Delivery Systems," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 245-256, January.
    20. Gur, Yonatan & Iancu, Dan & Warnes, Xavier, 2020. "Value Loss in Allocation Systems with Provider Guarantees," Research Papers 3813, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Organisation; Freight Transport; Centralisation or Decentralisation; Physical Internet; Price of Anarchy; Gamification;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02078872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.