IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v326y2025i3p481-497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does carrier collaboration require combinatorial auctions?

Author

Listed:
  • Vetschera, Rudolf
  • Knyazev, Dmitriy

Abstract

Carrier collaboration has emerged as an important way to increase the efficiency of the logistics sector and has attracted significant interest as a research topic in the past decades. Most frameworks for carrier collaboration rely on combinatorial auctions to allocate bundles of transportation requests to carriers. In this paper, we analyze whether combinatorial auctions are indeed needed for this purpose, or additive pricing schemes, in which requests are priced and allocated separately, could also lead to efficient allocations. Using additive pricing would considerably simplify the entire process. Starting from concepts of economic equilibria, we argue that theory does not rule out this possibility even for complex valuations. We then analyze how often additive pricing schemes can support an efficient allocation of requests by simulating capacity-constrained Traveling Salesperson Problems. Our results indicate that, depending on the geographical configuration of requests, this is indeed possible in a large fraction of problems. Thus we argue that the current focus of carrier collaboration research on bundle generation and combinatorial auctions needs to be reconsidered.

Suggested Citation

  • Vetschera, Rudolf & Knyazev, Dmitriy, 2025. "Does carrier collaboration require combinatorial auctions?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 326(3), pages 481-497.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:326:y:2025:i:3:p:481-497
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.04.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725002863
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.04.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:326:y:2025:i:3:p:481-497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.