IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02001120.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The credibility of judgment devices in question: wine consumers looking for autonomy
[La crédibilité des dispositifs de jugement en question : la recherche d'autonomie des aficionados de vin]

Author

Listed:
  • Roxane Favier

    (IREGE - Institut de Recherche en Gestion et en Economie - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc)

  • Anthony Galluzzo

    (COACTIS - COnception de l'ACTIon en Situation - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne)

  • Jean-Philippe Galan

    (IRGO - Institut de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - UB - Université de Bordeaux - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Bordeaux)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Roxane Favier & Anthony Galluzzo & Jean-Philippe Galan, 2018. "The credibility of judgment devices in question: wine consumers looking for autonomy [La crédibilité des dispositifs de jugement en question : la recherche d'autonomie des aficionados de vin]," Post-Print hal-02001120, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02001120
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02001120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02001120/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathryn A. Latour & Michael S. Latour, 2010. "Bridging Aficionados' Perceptual and Conceptual Knowledge to Enhance How They Learn from Experience," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(4), pages 688-697, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Viot, 2012. "Subjective knowledge, product attributes and consideration set : the wine case," Post-Print hal-01803724, HAL.
    2. Cammy Crolic & Chris Janiszewski, 2016. "Hedonic Escalation: When Food Just Tastes Better and Better," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(3), pages 388-406.
    3. Joy, Annamma & Wang, Jeff Jianfeng & Orazi, Davide C. & Yoon, Seyee & LaTour, Kathryn & Peña, Camilo, 2023. "Co-creating affective atmospheres in retail experience," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 297-317.
    4. Sarah Clemente & Eric Dolansky & Antonia Mantonakis & Katherine White, 2014. "The effects of perceived product-extrinsic cue incongruity on consumption experiences: The case of celebrity sponsorship," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 373-384, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    judgment devices; aficionados; credibility; singularities economics; dispositifs de jugement; crédibilité; économie des singularités;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02001120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.