IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01840057.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modelling net carrying amount of shares for market consistent valuation of life insurance liabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Dorobantu

    (SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

  • Yahia Salhi

    (SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

  • Pierre-Emmanuel Thérond

    (SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

Abstract

The attractiveness of insurance saving products is driven, among others, by dividends payments to policyholders and participation in profits. These are mainly constrained by regulatory measures on profit-sharing on the basis of statutory accounts. Moreover, since both prudential and financial reporting regulation require market consistent best estimate measurement of insurance liabilities, cash-flows projection models have to be used for such a purpose in order to derive the underlying financial incomes. Such models are based on Monte-Carlo techniques. The latter should simulate future accounting profit and losses needed for profit-sharing mechanisms. In this paper we deal with impairment losses on equity securities for financial portfolios which rely on instrument-by-instrument assessment (when projection models consider groups of shares). Our motivation is to describe the joint distribution of market value and impairment provision of a book of equity securities, with regard to the French accounting rules for depreciation. The results we obtain enable to improve the ability of projection models to represent such an asymmetric mechanism. Formally, an impairment loss is recognized for an equity instrument if there has been a significant and prolonged decline in its market value below the carrying cost (acquisition value). Such constraints are formalized using an assumption on the dynamics of the equity, and leads to a complex option-like pay-off. Using this formulation, we propose analytical formulas for some quantitative measurements related the impairments losses of a book of financial equities. These are derived on a general framework and some tractable example are illustrated. We also investigate the operational implementation of these formulas and compare their computational time to a basic simulation approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Dorobantu & Yahia Salhi & Pierre-Emmanuel Thérond, 2020. "Modelling net carrying amount of shares for market consistent valuation of life insurance liabilities," Post-Print hal-01840057, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01840057
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01840057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01840057/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcos Escobar & Julio Hernandez, 2014. "A Note on the Distribution of Multivariate Brownian Extrema," International Journal of Stochastic Analysis, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-6, November.
    2. Nicole El Karoui & Stéphane Loisel & Jean-Luc Prigent & Julien Vedani, 2017. "Market inconsistencies of the market-consistent European life insurance economic valuations: pitfalls and practical solutions," Post-Print hal-01242023, HAL.
    3. Gobet, Emmanuel, 2000. "Weak approximation of killed diffusion using Euler schemes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 167-197, June.
    4. Julien Azzaz & Stéphane Loisel & Pierre-E. Thérond, 2015. "Some characteristics of an equity security next-year impairment," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 111-135, July.
    5. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Florian Gach & Simon Hochgerner & Eva Kienbacher & Gabriel Schachinger, 2023. "Mean-field Libor market model and valuation of long term guarantees," Papers 2310.09022, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    2. Anna Rita Bacinello & An Chen & Thorsten Sehner & Pietro Millossovich, 2021. "On the Market-Consistent Valuation of Participating Life Insurance Heterogeneous Contracts under Longevity Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Florian Gach & Simon Hochgerner, 2021. "Estimation of future discretionary benefits in traditional life insurance," Papers 2101.06077, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diana Dorobantu & Yahia Salhi & Pierre-Emmanuel Thérond, 2018. "Modelling net carrying amount of shares for market consistent valuation of life insurance liabilities," Working Papers hal-01840057, HAL.
    2. Hideharu Funahashi & Masaaki Kijima, 2016. "Analytical pricing of single barrier options under local volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 867-886, June.
    3. Detlef Seese & Christof Weinhardt & Frank Schlottmann (ed.), 2008. "Handbook on Information Technology in Finance," International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer, number 978-3-540-49487-4, November.
    4. Hideharu Funahashi & Tomohide Higuchi, 2018. "An analytical approximation for single barrier options under stochastic volatility models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 266(1), pages 129-157, July.
    5. William R. Morgan, 2023. "Finance Must Be Defended: Cybernetics, Neoliberalism and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Filipe Fontanela & Antoine Jacquier & Mugad Oumgari, 2019. "A Quantum algorithm for linear PDEs arising in Finance," Papers 1912.02753, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    7. Weihan Li & Jin E. Zhang & Xinfeng Ruan & Pakorn Aschakulporn, 2024. "An empirical study on the early exercise premium of American options: Evidence from OEX and XEO options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(7), pages 1117-1153, July.
    8. Jun, Doobae & Ku, Hyejin, 2015. "Static hedging of chained-type barrier options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 317-327.
    9. Thomas Kokholm & Martin Stisen, 2015. "Joint pricing of VIX and SPX options with stochastic volatility and jump models," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(1), pages 27-48, January.
    10. Paul Ormerod, 2010. "La crisis actual y la culpabilidad de la teoría macroeconómica," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 12(22), pages 111-128, January-J.
    11. An Chen & Thai Nguyen & Thorsten Sehner, 2022. "Unit-Linked Tontine: Utility-Based Design, Pricing and Performance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    12. Kearney, Fearghal & Shang, Han Lin & Sheenan, Lisa, 2019. "Implied volatility surface predictability: The case of commodity markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Boyarchenko, Svetlana & Levendorskii[caron], Sergei, 2007. "Optimal stopping made easy," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 201-217, February.
    14. Robert C. Merton, 2006. "Paul Samuelson and Financial Economics," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 50(2), pages 9-31, October.
    15. Eduardo Abi Jaber, 2022. "The characteristic function of Gaussian stochastic volatility models: an analytic expression," Working Papers hal-02946146, HAL.
    16. Peter Carr & Liuren Wu, 2014. "Static Hedging of Standard Options," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 3-46.
    17. Ammann, Manuel & Kind, Axel & Wilde, Christian, 2003. "Are convertible bonds underpriced? An analysis of the French market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 635-653, April.
    18. Jeremy Leake, 2003. "Credit spreads on sterling corporate bonds and the term structure of UK interest rates," Bank of England working papers 202, Bank of England.
    19. Suleyman Basak & Georgy Chabakauri, 2012. "Dynamic Hedging in Incomplete Markets: A Simple Solution," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(6), pages 1845-1896.
    20. Jay Cao & Jacky Chen & John Hull & Zissis Poulos, 2021. "Deep Hedging of Derivatives Using Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2103.16409, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Best Estimate Technical Provision; Joint Density *; Impairment Losses; Insurance; Correlated Brownian Motions;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01840057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.