IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01594274.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The CAP reform and EC-US relations : the GATT as a cap on the CAP

Author

Listed:
  • Hervé Guyomard

    (Unité d'économie et sociologie rurales de rennes - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Louis Pascal Mahe

    (Unité d'économie et sociologie rurales de rennes - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Terry L. Roe

    (Independent)

  • S. Tarditi

    (Inconnu)

Abstract

Cet article examine les relations agricoles entre les États-Unis et la Communauté européenne dans la perspective d'un accord au GATT. Nous montrons que le GATT devrait permettre aux pays de modifier leurs politiques agricoles et que les forces intérieures ne permettraient pas à elles seules, d'aboutir à de telles réformes. L'attention est centrée sur la Politique Agricole de la Communauté et sur la définition d'une politique encore plus "découplée".

Suggested Citation

  • Hervé Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe & Terry L. Roe & S. Tarditi, 1993. "The CAP reform and EC-US relations : the GATT as a cap on the CAP," Post-Print hal-01594274, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01594274
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01594274v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01594274v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Munk, K J, 1989. "Price Support to the EC Agricultural Sector: An Optimal Policy?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 76-89, Summer.
    2. Guyomard, H. & Mahe, L. P., 1991. "Agriculture in the GATT: An assessment of the USA's 1989 proposal," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 330-341, August.
    3. Runge, C. Ford & von Witzke, Harald & Thompson, Shelley, 1987. "Liberal Agricultural Trade As A Public Good: Free Trade Versus Free Riding Under Gatt," Staff Papers 13635, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. Johnson, Martin & Mahe, Louis & Roe, Terry, 1993. "Trade compromises between the European community and the United States: An interest group-game theory," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 199-222, April.
    5. L. P. Mahé, 1988. "Trade Negotiation and Agriculture: New Approaches and Possible Consequences: Discussion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(5), pages 1156-1158.
    6. Herve Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe, 1991. "Agriculture in the GATT : an assessment of the USA's 1989 proposal," Post-Print hal-01594074, HAL.
    7. Paarlberg, Robert, 1989. "THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURAL POLICY: Three Approaches," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270661, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Barry K. Goodwin & François Ortalo-Magné, 1992. "The Capitalization of Wheat Subsidies into Agricultural Land Values," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 40(1), pages 37-54, March.
    9. Robert Paarlberg, 1989. "The Political Economy of American Agricultural Policy: Three Approaches," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(5), pages 1157-1164.
    10. Martin Johnson & Louis-Pascal Mahé & Terry L. Roe, 1993. "Trade compromises between the European Community and the United States : An interest Group-Game Theory approach," Post-Print hal-02381912, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ames, Glenn C.W. & Gunter, Lewell F. & Davis, Claudia D., 1996. "Analysis Of The U.S.-European Community Oilseeds Agreement," Faculty Series 16646, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    2. Xinshen Diao & Terry Roe & Agapi Somwaru, 2001. "What is the Cause of Growth in Regional Trade: Trade Liberalisation or RTAs? The Case of Agriculture," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 51-79, January.
    3. Ames, Glenn C. W. & Gunter, Lewell & Davis, Claudia D., 1996. "Analysis of USA-European Community oilseeds agreements," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 97-112, November.
    4. Guyomard, Herve & Bureau, Jean-Christophe & Gohin, Alexandre & Le Mouel, Chantal, 2000. "Impact of the 1996 US FAIR Act on the Common Agricultural Policy in the World Trade Organisation context: the decoupling issue," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 17-34, February.
    5. Alain Carpentier & Hervé Guyomard & Chantal Le Mouël, 1998. "Consistency between environmental and competitiveness objectives of agricultural policies: economics of price support, set-aside, direct payments and other Common Agricultural Policy instruments," Chapters, in: John M. Antle & Joseph N. Lekakis & George P. Zanias (ed.), Agriculture, Trade and the Environment, chapter 5, pages 89-111, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark T. Kanazawa, 2019. "Transaction Costs in Water Transfers: The issue of local control," Working Papers 2019-01, Carleton College, Department of Economics.
    2. GAIGNE, Carl & LAROCHE DUPRAZ, Cathie & MATTHEWS, Alan, 2015. "Thirty years of European research on international trade in food and agricultural products," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(1), March.
    3. Becker, Tilman & Labson, B. Stephan, 1991. "Optimal Policy Instruments and Political Preference Functions: An Application to the U.S. Wheat Sector," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271212, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Cole, Christine A. & Featherstone, Allen M., 1999. "Agriculture'S Shifting Political Power Base," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21554, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Fertő, Imre, 1999. "A Európai Unió közös agrárpolitikájának gazdaságtana II. A CAP politikai gazdaságtana [The economics of the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy, Part II. The political economy of CAP]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 813-822.
    6. Zobbe, Henrik, 2002. "On The Foundation Of Agricultural Policy Research In The United States," Staff Papers 28644, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    7. Zobbe, Henrik & Paarlberg, Philip L., 2003. "The Shaky Foundation Of Farm Policy In The United States - Flawed Analysis, Flawed Policy?," Staff Papers 28637, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    8. Thilo Glebe & Klaus Salhofer, 2007. "EU agri‐environmental programs and the “restaurant table effect”," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 37(2‐3), pages 211-218, September.
    9. Kennedy, P. Lynn & von Witzke, Harald & Roe, Terry, 1997. "International Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence and the Exchange Rate: A Game Theoretical Analysis," 1997 Occasional Paper Series No. 7 198198, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Goedecke, E. J. & Ortmann, G. F., 1992. "Farm Worker Legislation: Interest Groups And Developments," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 31(4), December.
    11. Rabinowicz, Ewa, 1992. "Cutting the Agricultural Price Pie: Power or Justice," 1992 Occasional Paper Series No. 6 197732, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Cemal Atici, 2008. "Political Economy of Agricultural Policies and Environmental Weights," ICER Working Papers 25-2008, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    13. Atici, Cemal & Kennedy, P. Lynn, 2000. "A Game Theoretic Analysis of Turkey's Integration into the European Union," 2000 Conference, August 13-18, 2000, Berlin, Germany 197225, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Kallio, Panu K.S. & Abbott, Philip C., 1998. "Export Subsidies And Switching Costs In An Imperfectly Competitive International Wheat Market," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20789, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. van Berkum, Siemen & van Meijl, Hans, 2000. "The application of trade and growth theories to agriculture: a survey," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(4), pages 1-38.
    16. Conforti, Piero, 2001. "The Common Agricultural Policy In Main Partial Equilibrium Models," Working Papers 14806, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Osservatorio Sulle Politiche Agricole dell'UE.
    17. H. Guyomard & L. P. Mahé & K. J. Munk & T. L. Roe, 1993. "Agriculture In The Uruguay Round: Ambitions And Realities," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 245-263, May.
    18. Gautam, Virender, 1992. "Identification of patterns of producer and consumer protection levels in food commodities: a cross-country, aggregate and commodity-specific analysis," ISU General Staff Papers 1992010108000017588, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    19. de Gorter, Harry, 2008. "Explaining Inefficient Policy Instruments," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 48638, World Bank.
    20. Kennedy, P. Lynn & Atici, Cemal, 1999. "A Game Theoretic Analysis Of Turkish Accession To A European Customs Union," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-11, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01594274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.