IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01582357.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards Hyperconnected Resource Requirements Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Raphaël Oger

    (Georgia Institute of Technology [Atlanta], CGI - Centre Génie Industriel - IMT Mines Albi - IMT École nationale supérieure des Mines d'Albi-Carmaux - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Matthieu Lauras

    (CGI - Centre Génie Industriel - IMT Mines Albi - IMT École nationale supérieure des Mines d'Albi-Carmaux - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Benoit Montreuil

    (Georgia Institute of Technology [Atlanta])

  • Frederick Benaben

    (CGI - Centre Génie Industriel - IMT Mines Albi - IMT École nationale supérieure des Mines d'Albi-Carmaux - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Nicolas Salatge

    (CGI - Centre Génie Industriel - IMT Mines Albi - IMT École nationale supérieure des Mines d'Albi-Carmaux - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

Abstract

This paper focuses on Resource Requirements Planning (RRP) for hyperconnected supply chain. The objective is to enable Physical Internet (PI) Logistics Web actors to plan their resources effectively to be able to fulfill the demand in the forthcoming years. We first identify a lack of research literature about RRP for hyperconnected supply chains. We conclude from our literature review that the research efforts done by the PI community are focused on enabling the PI to become operational. But the PI community has not yet shown any interest in PI strategic planning. So, we position our research regarding the MRP II system's RRP, focusing on the strategic planning processes for production and capacity control. Therefore, from the lack of research literature about RRP for hyperconnected supply chains, and from the MRP II strategic planning methodology structure, we demonstrate the significant need to adapt this MRP II system's RRP to fit the hyperconnected supply chains requirements and so the PI requirements. Finally, we introduce a Physical Internet Resource Requirement Planning (PI-RRP) methodology corresponding to our research agenda guidelines. The development of this methodology will drive our futures researches.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphaël Oger & Matthieu Lauras & Benoit Montreuil & Frederick Benaben & Nicolas Salatge, 2017. "Towards Hyperconnected Resource Requirements Planning," Post-Print hal-01582357, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01582357
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://imt-mines-albi.hal.science/hal-01582357v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://imt-mines-albi.hal.science/hal-01582357v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stadtler, Hartmut, 2005. "Supply chain management and advanced planning--basics, overview and challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(3), pages 575-588, June.
    2. Olhager, Jan & Rudberg, Martin & Wikner, Joakim, 2001. "Long-term capacity management: Linking the perspectives from manufacturing strategy and sales and operations planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 215-225, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuomikangas, Nina & Kaipia, Riikka, 2014. "A coordination framework for sales and operations planning (S&OP): Synthesis from the literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 243-262.
    2. Unai Apaolaza & Aitor Orue & Aitor Lizarralde & Aitor Oyarbide-Zubillaga, 2022. "Competitive Improvement through Integrated Management of Sales and Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Laurent Lim, Lâm & Alpan, Gülgün & Penz, Bernard, 2014. "Reconciling sales and operations management with distant suppliers in the automotive industry: A simulation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 20-36.
    4. Rajat Mishra & Randy Napier & Mahmut Yasar, 2019. "Do competitors respond to capacity changes? Evidence from U.S. manufacturers," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 159-172, December.
    5. repec:tkp:ijsrsy:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:73-91 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Sabet, Ehsan & Yazdani, Baback & Kian, Ramez & Galanakis, Kostas, 2020. "A strategic and global manufacturing capacity management optimisation model: A Scenario-based multi-stage stochastic programming approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    7. Mustapha Ouhimmou & Sophie D'Amours & Robert Beauregard & Daoud Ait-Kadi & Satyaveer Singh Chauhan, 2009. "Optimization Helps Shermag Gain Competitive Edge," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 329-345, August.
    8. Sivadasan, Suja & Smart, Janet & Huaccho Huatuco, Luisa & Calinescu, Anisoara, 2013. "Reducing schedule instability by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows at the supplier–customer interface," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 253-262.
    9. Mate Barany & Zsolt Tuza, 2015. "Circular coloring of graphs via linear programming and tabu search," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(4), pages 833-848, December.
    10. Goh, Shao Hung & Eldridge, Stephen, 2019. "Sales and Operations Planning: The effect of coordination mechanisms on supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 80-94.
    11. Ewing, Bradley T. & Thompson, Mark A., 2008. "Industrial production, volatility, and the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 553-558, October.
    12. Sajjad Rahmanzadeh & Mir Saman Pishvaee & Kannan Govindan, 2023. "Emergence of open supply chain management: the role of open innovation in the future smart industry using digital twin network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 329(1), pages 979-1007, October.
    13. Quan Zhu & Harold Krikke, 2020. "Managing a Sustainable and Resilient Perishable Food Supply Chain (PFSC) after an Outbreak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-11, June.
    14. Martínez-Costa, Carme & Mas-Machuca, Marta & Benedito, Ernest & Corominas, Albert, 2014. "A review of mathematical programming models for strategic capacity planning in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 66-85.
    15. Malinowski, Ethan & Karwan, Mark H. & Pinto, José M. & Sun, Lei, 2018. "A mixed-integer programming strategy for liquid helium global supply chain planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 168-188.
    16. Pedroso, Carolina Belotti & da Silva, Andrea Lago & Tate, Wendy Lea, 2016. "Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP): Insights from a multi-case study of Brazilian Organizations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 213-229.
    17. Marzieh ShahmariChatghieh & Harri Haapasalo & Anyanitha Distanont, 2013. "A Comparison of R&D Supply Chains and Service and Manufacturing Supply Chains," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 2(2), pages 73-91.
    18. Victor Tsapi & Marie-Noël Assene & Hans-Dietrich Haasis, 2022. "The Complexity of the Meat Supply Chain in Cameroon: Multiplicity of Actors, Interactions and Challenges," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Herbert Jodlbauer & Manuel Brunner & Nadine Bachmann & Shailesh Tripathi & Matthias Thürer, 2023. "Supply Chain Management: A Structured Narrative Review of Current Challenges and Recommendations for Action," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Kayakutlu, Gulgun & Buyukozkan, Gulcin, 2011. "Assessing performance factors for a 3PL in a value chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 441-452, June.
    21. Laura Laguna-Salvadó & Matthieu Lauras & Uche Okongwu & Tina Comes, 2019. "A multicriteria Master Planning DSS for a sustainable humanitarian supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1303-1343, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01582357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.