IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/frz/wpmmos/wp2025_01.rdf.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Insights from the management and accountability practices of the Florence cathedral construction site (1353-1382)

Author

Listed:
  • Carmela Nitti

    (University of Florence)

  • Marco Bellucci

    (University of Florence)

  • Pierluigi Terenzi

    (University of Florence)

  • Giacomo Manetti

    (University of Florence)

Abstract

This study examines the management and accountability practices employed by the Opera di Santa Maria del Fiore (OSMF) during the construction of Florence Cathedral between 1353 and 1382. Based on an analysis of 530 provisions recorded in the OSMF’s historical archives, the research investigates voluntary reporting practices and stakeholder engagement, offering new insights into the governance of hybrid organisations in the Middle Ages. The OSMF, funded by public resources, balanced the pressures of political and religious authorities through transparency and participatory decision-making. The analysis highlights three key aspects: (i) the role of stakeholders involved as advisors in the management of the construction site; (ii) the adoption of early forms of workplace welfare, such as loans, injury compensations, and wine distributions; (iii) the evolution of accounting practices in response to institutional and socio-economic pressures. Applying stakeholder-agency theory, institutional theory, and legitimacy theory, the study demonstrates that the OSMF’s reporting was not merely an administrative tool but also a means of securing social and political legitimacy. The findings contribute to accounting history and enhance our understanding of governance dynamics in complex environments. Furthermore, comparisons with contemporary accountability practices in public and hybrid organizations reveal interesting parallels and offer valuable lessons for modern management.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmela Nitti & Marco Bellucci & Pierluigi Terenzi & Giacomo Manetti, 2025. "Insights from the management and accountability practices of the Florence cathedral construction site (1353-1382)," Working Papers - Business wp2025_01.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    • Handle: RePEc:frz:wpmmos:wp2025_01.rdf
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.disei.unifi.it/upload/sub/pubblicazioni/repec/frz/wpmmos/pdf/wp01_2025.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ball, Amanda & Craig, Russell, 2010. "Using neo-institutionalism to advance social and environmental accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 283-293.
    2. Jan Bebbington & Carlos Larrinaga & Jose M. Moneva, 2008. "Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 337-361, March.
    3. Gatzert, Nadine, 2015. "The impact of corporate reputation and reputation damaging events on financial performance: Empirical evidence from the literature," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 485-499.
    4. Markus Milne & Rob Gray, 2013. "W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 13-29, November.
    5. Linda Thorne & Lois S. Mahoney & Giacomo Manetti, 2014. "Motivations for issuing standalone CSR reports: a survey of Canadian firms," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(4), pages 686-714, April.
    6. Nola Buhr, 1998. "Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: the case of acid rain and Falconbridge," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 163-190, May.
    7. Charles W. L. Hill & Thomas M. Jones, 1992. "Stakeholder‐Agency Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 131-154, March.
    8. Eric Abrahamson & Philippe Baumard, 2008. "What Lies Behind Organizational Facades and How Organizational Façade Lie: An Untold Story of Organizational Decision Making," Post-Print hal-03227784, HAL.
    9. Covaleski, Mark A. & Dirsmith, Mark W., 1991. "The management of legitimacy and politics in public sector administration," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 135-156.
    10. Patten, Dennis M., 1992. "Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 471-475, July.
    11. Brunsson, Nils, 1993. "Ideas and actions: Justification and hypocrisy as alternatives to control," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 489-506, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diletta Acuti & Marco Bellucci & Giacomo Manetti, 2024. "Preventive and Remedial Actions in Corporate Reporting Among “Addiction Industries”: Legitimacy, Effectiveness and Hypocrisy Perception," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 603-623, January.
    2. Michelon, Giovanna & Pilonato, Silvia & Ricceri, Federica, 2015. "CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 59-78.
    3. Colin Higgins & Markus Milne & Bernadine Gramberg, 2015. "The Uptake of Sustainability Reporting in Australia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 445-468, June.
    4. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    5. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti, 2021. "Banks' business strategy and environmental effectiveness: The monitoring role of the board of directors and the managerial incentives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2656-2670, July.
    6. Charles H. Cho & Matias Laine & Robin W. Roberts & Michelle Rodrigue, 2018. "The Frontstage and Backstage of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Bill," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 865-886, October.
    7. Lee Roberts & Monomita Nandy & Abeer Hassan & Suman Lodh & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2022. "Corporate Accountability Towards Species Extinction Protection: Insights from Ecologically Forward-Thinking Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 571-595, July.
    8. Maria Federica Izzo & Alberto Dello Strologo & Fabrizio Granà, 2020. "Learning from the Best: New Challenges and Trends in IR Reporters’ Disclosure and the Role of SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Francesca Manes-Rossi & Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Giuseppe Nicolò & Gianluca Zanellato, 2018. "Ensuring More Sustainable Reporting in Europe Using Non-Financial Disclosure—De Facto and De Jure Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Josette Caruana,, 2017. "Reform for reform's sake: A never-ending story of governmental accounting change," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 13(5), pages 676-705, December.
    11. Philipp Baier & Marc Berninger & Florian Kiesel, 2020. "Environmental, social and governance reporting in annual reports: A textual analysis," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 93-118, August.
    12. Clara Pérez‐Cornejo & Esther de Quevedo‐Puente & Juan Bautista Delgado‐García, 2020. "Reporting as a booster of the corporate social performance effect on corporate reputation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1252-1263, May.
    13. Mohamed Chelli & Sylvain Durocher & Anne Fortin, 2018. "Normativity in Environmental Reporting: A Comparison of Three Regimes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 285-311, May.
    14. She, Chaoyuan & Michelon, Giovanna, 2019. "Managing stakeholder perceptions: Organized hypocrisy in CSR disclosures on Facebook," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 54-76.
    15. Clément Feger & Laurent Mermet, 2017. "A blueprint towards accounting for the management of ecosystems," Post-Print hal-01930913, HAL.
    16. Feng, Zhi-Yuan & Wang, Ying-Chieh & Wang, Wen-Gine, 2024. "Corporate carbon reduction and tax avoidance: International evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2).
    17. Qian, Wei & Schaltegger, Stefan, 2017. "Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 365-379.
    18. Whitehead, Martin & Belghitar, Yacine, 2022. "Responding to a corruption crisis through disclosure and remedial action: The case of Petrobras," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).
    19. Roth, Victoria, 2021. "Talking is Silver, Doing is Gold? – The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(3), pages 637-672.
    20. Tauringana, Venancio & Chithambo, Lyton, 2015. "The effect of DEFRA guidance on greenhouse gas disclosure," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 425-444.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Accounting history; accountability; Middle Ages; reporting; welfare; stakeholder engagement; Florence;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • N33 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Europe: Pre-1913

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:frz:wpmmos:wp2025_01.rdf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Francesco Capone or Marco Bellucci (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/defirit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.