IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedawp/98-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Uncertain litigation cost and seller behavior: Evidence from an auditing game

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Zhang
  • Bryan K. Church
  • Lucy F. Ackert

Abstract

This paper reports the results of two experiments, each consisting of six sessions, designed to investigate difficulties that arise in estimating expected litigation costs in an auditing game. In each experimental session, the game consists of a series of periods in which sellers submit sealed offers to computerized buyers and, if hired, choose an effort level (low or high). The effort level affects the certain (direct) and uncertain (litigation) costs of performing the engagement. Across the two experiments, we vary the uncertainty surrounding the determination of the expected litigation cost. Our results strongly suggest that cognitive limitations hinder sellers' abilities to estimate total expected litigation costs. Across both experiments we observe a nontrivial number of suboptimal effort choices. Moreover, as the uncertainty of determining the expected litigation cost increases, the frequency of observed fee offers below the total expected cost of an engagement increases markedly.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Zhang & Bryan K. Church & Lucy F. Ackert, 1998. "Uncertain litigation cost and seller behavior: Evidence from an auditing game," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 98-17, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedawp:98-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.frbatlanta.org//filelegacydocs/wp9817.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:joares:v:32:y:1994:i::p:103-130 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Lipshitz, Raanan & Strauss, Orna, 1997. "Coping with Uncertainty: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 149-163, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Accounting;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedawp:98-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Elaine Clokey). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/frbatus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.