IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/26043.html

Picking Winners or Making Them? Evidence from the J-Startup program

Author

Listed:
  • Masatoshi KATO
  • Kenta IKEUCHI

Abstract

Using a longitudinal dataset of Japanese start-ups, this study evaluates the J-Startup program, Japan’s flagship initiative aimed at fostering globally competitive start-ups. We estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) using propensity score matching, finding that program participation significantly enhances firm growth, particularly in employment and sales, and increases the likelihood of generating high-growth firms. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that these effects are particularly pronounced for younger firms, while evidence on firm size remains inconclusive. To explore underlying mechanisms, we examine financing capacity and network expansion as potential channels. We find that program participation enhances financing capacity, which in turn is positively associated with firm growth, which is consistent with a certification-induced financing channel. While program participation also expands investor and customer networks, these channels show limited association with firm growth. Overall, the findings suggest that while the program exhibits elements of “picking winners,” its marginal impact is strongest for firms at earlier stages of development, and that growth effects operate primarily through certification-induced improvements in financing capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Masatoshi KATO & Kenta IKEUCHI, 2026. "Picking Winners or Making Them? Evidence from the J-Startup program," Discussion papers 26043, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:26043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/26e043.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kohei Takahashi & Yuki Hashimoto, 2023. "Small grant subsidy application effects on productivity improvement: evidence from Japanese SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1631-1658, April.
    2. Philippe Aghion & Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & Peter Howitt & Susanne Prantl, 2009. "The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 91(1), pages 20-32, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gersbach, Hans & Schneider, Maik & Schneller, Olivier, 2010. "Optimal Mix of Applied and Basic Research, Distance to Frontier, and Openness," CEPR Discussion Papers 7795, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    2. Marina Rybalka, 2015. "The innovative input mix. Assessing the importance of R&D and ICT investments for firm performance in manufacturing and services," Discussion Papers 801, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    3. Massimo Colombo & Annalisa Croce & Samuele Murtinu, 2014. "Ownership structure, horizontal agency costs and the performance of high-tech entrepreneurial firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 265-282, February.
    4. Steven Bond‐Smith, 2022. "Discretely innovating: The effect of limited market contestability on innovation and growth," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 69(3), pages 301-327, July.
    5. Baiker, Laura & Bertola, Elena & Jelitto, Markus, 2021. "Services Domestic Regulation - Locking in good regulatory practices: Analyzing the prevalence of Services Domestic Regulation disciplines and their potential linkages with economic performance," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2021-14, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    6. Viktoria Kocsis & Victoria Shestalova & Henry van der Wiel & Nick Zubanov & Ruslan Lukach & Bert Minne, 2009. "Relation entry, exit and productivity: an overview of recent theoretical and empirical literature," CPB Document 180.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    7. Fabiano Schivardi & Eliana Viviano, 2007. "Entry barriers in Italian retail trade," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 616, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    8. Denis Fougère & Golfier, C. & Guillaume Horny & Elisabeth Kremp, 2013. "What has been the impact of the 2008 crisis on firms default? (in French)," Working papers 463, Banque de France.
    9. Henry van der Wiel & Harold Creusen & George van Leeuwen & Eugene Van der Pijll, 2012. "The Dutch Productivity Performance: Cross Your Border and Look Around," Chapters, in: Matilde Mas & Robert Stehrer (ed.), Industrial Productivity in Europe, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Joseph A. Clougherty & Klaus Gugler & Lars Sørgard, 2012. "Cross-Border Mergers and Domestic Wages: Integrating Positive 'Spillover' Effects and Negative 'Bargaining' Effects," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp136, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    11. World Bank, 2023. "Digital Conglomerates in East Asia," World Bank Publications - Reports 40641, The World Bank Group.
    12. Katariina Nilsson Hakkala & Yao Pan, 2024. "Export competition with China and firms' coping strategies," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 91(364), pages 1454-1481, October.
    13. Tan, Zhidong & Li, Fei & Liu, Fule & Zhao, Jing, 2026. "Public data openness and enterprise innovation efficiency," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Da Rin, Marco & Di Giacomo, Marina & Sembenelli, Alessandro, 2011. "Entrepreneurship, firm entry, and the taxation of corporate income: Evidence from Europe," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 1048-1066.
    15. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    16. Liu, Kai & Chen, Jiayi & Tian, Yuan & Qu, Baobo & Iqbal, Badar Alam, 2025. "Import demand, digital empowerment and firm innovation," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    17. Dietmar Harhoff, 2008. "Innovation, Entrepreneurship und Demographie," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(s1), pages 46-72, May.
    18. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2009-034 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Maria Bas & Ivan Ledezma, 2010. "Trade integration and within-plant productivity evolution in Chile," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 146(1), pages 113-146, April.
    20. John S Heywood & Uwe Jirjahn & Annika Pfister, 2020. "Product market competition and employer provided training in Germany," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(2), pages 533-556.
    21. Cincera, Michele & Ince, Ela & Santos, Anabela, 2024. "Revisiting the innovation-competition nexus: Evidence from worldwide manufacturing and service industries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 586-603.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:26043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.