IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/leqsxx/p0077.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Europe Need a Demos to Be Truly Democratic?

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Innerarity

Abstract

Principal theories about European democracy agree that there is no European demos (unfortunately or inevitably, depending on whether one is a federalist or intergovernmentalist). In my opinion, the no demos theory, in all its various manifestations, has, at least tacitly, an excessively demanding concept of demos, utopian for federalists and static for intergovernmentalists. In both cases, it is so categorical that it does not correspond to the history from which political communities have arisen, nor to how a sense of belonging is truly established, nor to the limits on the expectations we can reasonably hold for Europe. The demos could be more practical and contingent, more performative and vulnerable. It can, for that very reason, be constructed or lost; it is more emergent and fragile than those who view it so emphatically believe. Additionally, what if the peoples who truly exist were not such a solid group or did not need to be so? In that case, it may even be that European integration represents an opportunity to articulate unity and diversity in a manner that is more respectful of its internal plurality. In order to do that, we obviously need very different concepts and practices than the ones that gave rise to the nation state.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Innerarity, 2014. "Does Europe Need a Demos to Be Truly Democratic?," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 7, London School of Economics / European Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:leqsxx:p0077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute/LEQS/LEQSPaper77.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Cram, 2012. "Does the EU Need a Navel? Implicit and Explicit Identification with the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 71-86, January.
    2. Tobias Theiler, 2012. "Does the European Union Need to Become a Community?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 783-800, September.
    3. Haas, Ernst B., 1961. "International Integration: The European and the Universal Process," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 366-392, July.
    4. Loukas Tsoukalis, 2011. "The JCMS Annual Review Lecture. The Shattering of Illusions – And What Next?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(Supplemen), pages 19-44, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyman, Richard & Gumbrell-McCormick, Rebecca, 2020. "(How) can international trade union organisations be democratic?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105078, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Richard Hyman & Rebecca Gumbrell-McCormick, 2020. "(How) can international trade union organisations be democratic?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(3), pages 253-272, August.
    3. Gumbrell McCormick, Rebecca & Hyman, Richard, 2018. "Democracy in trade unions, democracy through trade unions?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 89230, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Innerarity, 2014. "Does Europe Need a Demos to Be Truly Democratic?," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 77, European Institute, LSE.
    2. Haroldo Ramanzini Junior & Bruno Theodoro Luciano, 2021. "Regional (dis)integration beyond governments: A comparison in social and civil society participation between Mercosur and SADC," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(1), pages 18-34, March.
    3. Nathaniel Copsey & Tim Haughton, 2013. "Editorial: Edging Away from the Abyss – The EU in 2012," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51, pages 1-5, September.
    4. Soetkin Verhaegen & Marc Hooghe & Ellen Quintelier, 2014. "European Identity and Support for European Integration: A Matter of Perceived Economic Benefits?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 295-314, May.
    5. Christoffer Kølvraa, 2016. "European Fantasies: On the EU's Political Myths and the Affective Potential of Utopian Imaginaries for European Identity," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 169-184, January.
    6. Anand Menon, 2014. "The JCMS Annual Review Lecture Divided and Declining? Europe in a Changing World," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52, pages 5-24, November.
    7. Claudia Aradau & Jef Huysmans & Vicki Squire, 2010. "Acts of European Citizenship: A Political Sociology of Mobility," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 945-965, September.
    8. Brian Efird & Gaspare M. Genna, 2002. "Structural Conditions and the Propensity for Regional Integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 3(3), pages 267-295, September.
    9. Bálint L. TÓTH, 2019. "The Visegrád Group and the railway development interest articulation in Central Eastern Europe," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 10, pages 175-195, December.
    10. Nathaniel Copsey & Tim Haughton, 2014. "Editorial: Opening Pandora's Box? The EU in 2013," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52, pages 1-4, November.
    11. Manuel Enverga, 2018. "Comparing ASEAN and the EU’s implementation of cultural projects: a historical institutionalist analysis," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 65-80, March.
    12. Sarah Ciaglia & Clemens Fuest & Friedrich Heinemann, 2018. "What a feeling?! How to promote ‘European Identity’," EconPol Policy Reports 9, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    13. Kristine Mitchell, 2015. "Rethinking the ‘Erasmus Effect’ on European Identity," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 330-348, March.
    14. Colin W. Lawson & John Hudson, 2015. "Who Is Anti-American in the European Union?," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, May.
    15. Miroslava Scholten & Daniel Scholten, 2017. "From Regulation to Enforcement in the EU Policy Cycle: A New Type of Functional Spillover?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 925-942, July.
    16. Tracy Ledger, 2019. "Charity begins at home: The political economy of non-tariff barriers to trade in Southern Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-61, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Claire A. Dunlop & Claudio M. Radaelli, 2016. "Policy learning in the Eurozone crisis: modes, power and functionality," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(2), pages 107-124, June.
    18. Mayer, Sebastian, 2006. "TACIS and EU's security of energy supply: the Commission as a strategic actor in external relations," TranState Working Papers 46, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    19. Ummu Salma Bava, 2017. "India and the Global Order," International Studies, , vol. 54(1-4), pages 22-41, January.
    20. Lorenzo Fioramonti & Frank Mattheis, 2016. "Is Africa Really Following Europe? An Integrated Framework for Comparative Regionalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 674-690, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    democracy; European identity;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:leqsxx:p0077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Katjana Gattermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.