IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eoe/escoed/escoe-dp-2026-01.html

Distributional National Accounts: Measuring Material Living Standards and the Cost-of-living by Income Quintile

Author

Listed:
  • Grilli, Joseph
  • Schreyer, Paul
  • Zwijnenburg, Jorrit

Abstract

We develop a framework to measure changes in material wellbeing defined as real market consumption plus government-provided Social Transfers in Kind across income groups, consistent with the System of National Accounts. Applying this framework to eleven OECD countries, we find that Social Transfers in Kind matter for evolution of material living standards, albeit with significant differences between countries and income groups. Across countries, no clear income gradient can be found in the evolution of material well-being. However, the cost-of-living, both adjusted and unadjusted for Social Transfers in Kind, has tended to rise faster for low-income households. Significant gaps in deflators for these transfers highlight a key measurement challenge.

Suggested Citation

  • Grilli, Joseph & Schreyer, Paul & Zwijnenburg, Jorrit, 2026. "Distributional National Accounts: Measuring Material Living Standards and the Cost-of-living by Income Quintile," Discussion Papers escoe-dp-2026-01, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence.
    • Handle: RePEc:eoe:escoed:escoe-dp-2026-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.repository-escoe.com/id/eprint/88/1/ESCoE%20DP%202026-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Mitchell & James Lewis & Jorrit Zwijnenburg & Rachida Dkhissi & Thomas Prendergast, 2022. "International comparisons of the measurement of non-market output during the COVID-19 pandemic," OECD Statistics Working Papers 2022/03, OECD Publishing.
    2. McFadden, Daniel, 1978. "Cost, Revenue, and Profit Functions," Histoy of Economic Thought Chapters, in: Fuss, Melvyn & McFadden, Daniel (ed.),Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, volume 1, chapter 1, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought.
    3. Xavier Jaravel, 2021. "Inflation Inequality: Measurement, Causes, and Policy Implications," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 599-629, August.
    4. Neary, J. P. & Roberts, K. W. S., 1980. "The theory of household behaviour under rationing," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 25-42, January.
    5. Fleurbaey, Marc & Blanchet, Didier, 2013. "Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199767199.
    6. Browning, M J, 1983. "Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Conditional Cost Functions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(3), pages 851-856, May.
    7. W. Diewert, 2011. "Measuring productivity in the public sector: some conceptual problems," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 177-191, October.
    8. Bart Hobijn & David Lagakos, 2005. "Inflation Inequality In The United States," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 51(4), pages 581-606, December.
    9. Diewert, W. E., 1976. "Exact and superlative index numbers," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 115-145, May.
    10. W. Diewert, 2012. "The measurement of productivity in the nonmarket sector," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 217-229, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. SCHREYER, Paul, 2026. "What’s in A Price? : Valuation for Welfare and National Accounts," CEI Working Paper Series 2025-03, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    2. Lee, Lung-Fei & Pitt, Mark M., 1984. "Microeconometric Models of Consumer and Producer Demand with Limited Dependent Variables," Bulletins 7495, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    3. W. Erwin Diewert, 2022. "Duality in Production," Springer Books, in: Subhash C. Ray & Robert G. Chambers & Subal C. Kumbhakar (ed.), Handbook of Production Economics, chapter 3, pages 57-168, Springer.
    4. Peter Levell & Martin O'Connell & Kate Smith, 2025. "The welfare effects of price shocks and household relief packages: evidence from an energy crisis," IFS Working Papers W25/03, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    5. Paul Schreyer, 2021. "Framing Measurement Beyond GDP," CEPA Working Papers Series WP172021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    6. Diewert, W. Erwin, 2017. "Productivity Measurement in the Public Sector: Theory and Practice," Microeconomics.ca working papers erwin_diewert-2017-1, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 02 Feb 2017.
    7. Kelsey O'Flaherty, 2026. "A New Reason to Hate Grocery Inflation: Measuring and Interpreting Inflation Heterogeneity," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2026-001, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    8. Leonardo Ciambezi & Alessandro Pietropaoli, 2026. "Relative Price Shocks and Inequality: Evidence from Italy," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 12(1), pages 397-440, March.
    9. Muhammad Ali Chaudhary & Eatzaz Ahmad & Abid A. Burki & Mushtaq A. Khan, 1999. "Industrial Sector Input Demand Responsiveness and Policy Interventions," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 1083-1100.
    10. W. Erwin Diewert & Koji Nomura & Chihiro Shimizu, 2025. "Estimating flexible functional forms using macroeconomic data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 69(5), pages 2671-2697, November.
    11. Deb Kusum Das, 2003. "Manufacturing productivity under varying trade regmies: India in the 1980s and 1990s," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 107, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    12. Blow, Laura & Crawford, Ian, 2002. "A nonparametric method for valuing new goods," Working Paper Series 143, European Central Bank.
    13. W. Erwin Diewert & Kevin J. Fox, 2017. "Decomposing Value Added Growth into Explanatory Factors," Discussion Papers 2017-02, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    14. Piccolo, Jessica & Gorodnichenko, Yuriy, 2025. "Homeownership and Attention to Inflation: Evidence from Information Treatments," CEPR Discussion Papers 20087, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    15. W. Erwin Diewert & Kevin J. Fox, 2014. "Decomposing Bjurek Productivity Indexes into Explanatory Factors," Discussion Papers 2014-33, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    16. Pallotti, Filippo & Paz-Pardo, Gonzalo & Slacalek, Jiri & Tristani, Oreste & Violante, Giovanni L., 2023. "Who bears the costs of inflation? Euro area households and the 2021–2022 shock," Working Paper Series 2877, European Central Bank.
    17. Abe Naohito & Inoue Toshikatsu & Sato Hideyasu, 2022. "Price Index Numbers under Large-Scale Demand Shocks–The Japanese Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Official Statistics, Paradigm, vol. 38(1), pages 301-317, March.
    18. DECANCQ, Koen & FLEURBAEY, Marc & SCHOKKAERT, Erik, 2014. "Inequality, income, and well-being," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2014018, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    19. Alexander W. Huber, 2023. "Inflation inequality in Austria: A mid-term view on cost-of-living developments," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 49(1), pages 91-120.
    20. Germain, Antoine, 2025. "Consumer welfare beyond GDP," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2025011, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • E01 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth; Environmental Accounts
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eoe:escoed:escoe-dp-2026-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Communications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/escoeuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.