IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/112492.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improving warehouse responsiveness by job priority management

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, T.Y.

Abstract

Warehouses employ order cut-off times to ensure sufficient time for fulfilment. To satisfy higher consumer expectations, these cut-off times are gradually postponed to improve order responsiveness. Warehouses therefore have to allocate jobs more efficiently to meet compressed response times. Priority job management by means of flow-shop models has been used mainly for manufacturing systems but can also be applied for warehouse job scheduling to accommodate tighter cut-off times. This study investigates which priority rule performs best under which circumstances. The performance of each rule is evaluated in terms of a common cost criterion that integrates the objectives of low earliness, low tardiness, low labour idleness, and low work-in-process stocks. A real-world case study for a warehouse distribution centre of an original equipment manufacturer in consumer electronics provides the input parameters for a simulation study. The simulation outcomes validate several strategies for improved responsiveness. In particular, the critical ratio rule has the fastest flow-time and performs best for warehouse scenarios with expensive products and high labour costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, T.Y., 2018. "Improving warehouse responsiveness by job priority management," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2018-02, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:112492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/112492/Repub_112492.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul J. Burke, 1956. "The Output of a Queuing System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(6), pages 699-704, December.
    2. Chien-Ming Chen & Yeming Gong & René de Koster & Nunen Jo A.E.E. Van, 2010. "A Flexible Evaluative Framework for Order Picking Systems," Post-Print hal-02312453, HAL.
    3. Steven Hackman & Edward Frazelle & Paul Griffin & Susan Griffin & Dimitra Vlasta, 2001. "Benchmarking Warehousing and Distribution Operations: An Input-Output Approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 79-100, July.
    4. Kenneth R. Baker & Gary D. Scudder, 1990. "Sequencing with Earliness and Tardiness Penalties: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 22-36, February.
    5. Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & de Koster, René B.M., 2009. "Evaluating order throughput time in 2-block warehouses with time window batching," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 654-664, October.
    6. S. M. Johnson, 1954. "Optimal two‐ and three‐stage production schedules with setup times included," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 61-68, March.
    7. Ramasesh, R, 1990. "Dynamic job shop scheduling: A survey of simulation research," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 43-57.
    8. William L. Berry & Vittal Rao, 1975. "Critical Ratio Scheduling: An Experimental Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 192-201, October.
    9. Wayne E. Smith, 1956. "Various optimizers for single‐stage production," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 59-66, March.
    10. de Koster, Rene & Le-Duc, Tho & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2007. "Design and control of warehouse order picking: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 481-501, October.
    11. John J. Bartholdi & Donald D. Eisenstein & Robert D. Foley, 2001. "Performance of Bucket Brigades When Work Is Stochastic," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 710-719, October.
    12. Stephen C. Graves & Warren H. Hausman & Leroy B. Schwarz, 1977. "Storage-Retrieval Interleaving in Automatic Warehousing Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(9), pages 935-945, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, T.Y., 2018. "Improving warehouse responsiveness by job priority management," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2018-02, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    2. van Gils, Teun & Ramaekers, Katrien & Caris, An & de Koster, René B.M., 2018. "Designing efficient order picking systems by combining planning problems: State-of-the-art classification and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 1-15.
    3. Boysen, Nils & de Koster, René & Weidinger, Felix, 2019. "Warehousing in the e-commerce era: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 396-411.
    4. Stef Moons & Katrien Ramaekers & An Caris & Yasemin Arda, 2018. "Integration of order picking and vehicle routing in a B2C e-commerce context," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 813-843, December.
    5. XiaoLi Zhang & Jelle de Vries & René de Koster & ChenGuang Liu, 2022. "Fast and Faultless? Quantity and Quality Feedback in Order Picking," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1536-1559, April.
    6. van der Gaast, Jelmer Pier & Weidinger, Felix, 2022. "A deep learning approach for the selection of an order picking system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 530-543.
    7. Jiuh‐Biing Sheu & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2023. "Can we work more safely and healthily with robot partners? A human‐friendly robot–human‐coordinated order fulfillment scheme," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 794-812, March.
    8. van Gils, Teun & Ramaekers, Katrien & Braekers, Kris & Depaire, Benoît & Caris, An, 2018. "Increasing order picking efficiency by integrating storage, batching, zone picking, and routing policy decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 243-261.
    9. Silva, Allyson & Coelho, Leandro C. & Darvish, Maryam & Renaud, Jacques, 2020. "Integrating storage location and order picking problems in warehouse planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    10. Miri Gilenson & Dvir Shabtay & Liron Yedidsion & Rohit Malshe, 2021. "Scheduling in multi-scenario environment with an agreeable condition on job processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 307(1), pages 153-173, December.
    11. Awi Federgruen & Gur Mosheiov, 1993. "Simultaneous optimization of efficiency and performance balance measures in single‐machine scheduling problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(7), pages 951-970, December.
    12. Gu, Jinxiang & Goetschalckx, Marc & McGinnis, Leon F., 2010. "Research on warehouse design and performance evaluation: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 539-549, June.
    13. Marcus Ang & Yun Fong Lim & Melvyn Sim, 2012. "Robust Storage Assignment in Unit-Load Warehouses," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(11), pages 2114-2130, November.
    14. Derhami, Shahab & Smith, Jeffrey S. & Gue, Kevin R., 2020. "A simulation-based optimization approach to design optimal layouts for block stacking warehouses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    15. Zhuang, Yanling & Zhou, Yun & Hassini, Elkafi & Yuan, Yufei & Hu, Xiangpei, 2022. "Rack retrieval and repositioning optimization problem in robotic mobile fulfillment systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Yu, Y. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2009. "On the Suboptimality of Full Turnover-Based Storage," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-051-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    17. Yu, M. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2007. "Performance Approximation and Design of Pick-and-Pass Order Picking Systems," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-082-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Dijkstra, Arjan S. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2017. "Exact route-length formulas and a storage location assignment heuristic for picker-to-parts warehouses," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 38-59.
    19. Sandra Hahn & André Scholz, 2017. "Order Picking in Narrow-Aisle Warehouses: A Fast Approach to Minimize Waiting Times," FEMM Working Papers 170006, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    20. Subir S. Rao & Gajendra K. Adil, 2017. "Analytical models for a new turnover-based hybrid storage policy in unit-load warehouses," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 327-346, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    responsiveness; queuing model; order fulfilment; cut-off operation; flow-shop scheduling;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:112492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.