IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/004912/5071.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory For South Africa: A Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Reyno Seymore
  • R. Inglesi-Lotz1
  • J. Blignaut1

Abstract

A comparative analysis among the various greenhouse gas (GHG) emission inventories of South Africa is conducted, and in the process new inventories for 2007 and 2008 are constructed. The need for such a comparative analysis exists due to the number of inventories that have been published by, among others, the South African Department of Energy (DoE), the South African Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT), the International Energy Agency (IEA), Scholes and van der Merwe (1996), Howells and Solomon (2000), and Blignaut et al. (2005). Not only are these emission inventories relatively dated and requiring an update, but they also make use of different methodologies and report on the emissions using different industrial classifications. This paper proposes a consistent and theoretical rigorous approach to construct a reliable and timeous GHG emissions inventory. To accomplish this task, this paper develops GHG emissions databases for 2007 and 2008 in terms of industrial sectors, using the energy balances of South Africa. The South African Department of Energy (DoE), the South African Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT), as well as the International Energy Agency (IEA) published emissions data for South Africa. However, there seems to be inconsistencies between the different emission datasets. • The IEA database, while providing useful information for the comparison analysis with other countries, neither provides disaggregated emissions per sector nor includes other (non-CO2) greenhouse gas emissions. • The DoE has recent data and on a desired level of disaggregation; however, due to data gaps it probably underestimates emissions. • The DEAT inventory, while it includes a high level of disaggregation with an all-inclusive approach, is relatively dated providing an inventory only until 2000. Based on the consistent similarity between the Blignaut et al. (2005) and the 2006 IPCC Emissions Guidelines inventories, as well as the methodological rigor of both approaches, compared to the ambiguous treatment of several sectors in the DoE inventory, the suggested inventory to use is either the inventory constructed using the same emission factors as Blignaut et al. (2005) or the one using the 2006 IPCC Emissions Guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Reyno Seymore & R. Inglesi-Lotz1 & J. Blignaut1, 2013. "A Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory For South Africa: A Comparative Analysis," EcoMod2013 5071, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:004912:5071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/A%20Greenhouse%20Gas%20Emissions%20Inventory%20for%20SA.doc
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henneman, Lucas R.F. & Rafaj, Peter & Annegarn, Harold J. & Klausbruckner, Carmen, 2016. "Assessing emissions levels and costs associated with climate and air pollution policies in South Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 160-170.
    2. Pillay, N.S. & Brent, A.C. & Musango, J.K., 2019. "Affordability of battery electric vehicles based on disposable income and the impact on provincial residential electricity requirements in South Africa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1077-1087.
    3. Walwyn, David Richard & Brent, Alan Colin, 2015. "Renewable energy gathers steam in South Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 390-401.
    4. Nong, Duy, 2020. "Development of the electricity-environmental policy CGE model (GTAP-E-PowerS): A case of the carbon tax in South Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    South Africa; Energy and environmental policy; Developing countries;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:004912:5071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Theresa Leary). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.