IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/129122.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Toolkit for monitoring, evaluation, and learning for National Adaptation Plan processes

Author

Listed:
  • Beauchamp, Emilie
  • Leiter, Timo
  • Pringle, Patrick
  • Brooks, Nick
  • Masud, Shafaq
  • Guerdat, Patrick

Abstract

As the impacts of climate change and climate-related shocks become more unpredictable and severe, countries are increasingly using National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes to design and build resilient strategies – and learn from them. Monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) systems are critical to enabling countries to understand whether NAP processes work, how they work, and for whom, and how to improve actions based on the insights gained. Continuously learning from NAP processes’ actions and adjusting strategies accordingly is crucial to enhancing the effectiveness of adaptation and avoiding negative unintended effects from policies and interventions. MEL systems for NAP processes are also an important source of information for processes under the Paris Agreement, including assessing collective progress on the global goal of adaptation through the UAE Framework for Global Climate Resilience and, relatedly, the adaptation section of Biennial Transparency Reports. This toolkit for MEL for NAP processes provides practical guidance for developing and continuously improving MEL systems for NAP processes. It is designed for government actors coordinating NAP processes, stakeholders, and development partners supporting adaptation planning and implementation. This toolkit provides flexible yet concrete guidance on the planning, implementation, and revision of MEL systems, regardless of what stage countries are at in their NAP processes or the development and implementation of their MEL system. The toolkit has been developed in collaboration with the UN Adaptation Committee.

Suggested Citation

  • Beauchamp, Emilie & Leiter, Timo & Pringle, Patrick & Brooks, Nick & Masud, Shafaq & Guerdat, Patrick, 2024. "Toolkit for monitoring, evaluation, and learning for National Adaptation Plan processes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 129122, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:129122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/129122/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stéphane J. Baele, 2013. "The ethics of New Development Economics: is the Experimental Approach to Development Economics morally wrong?," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 7(1), November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bildad Awere & Daniel Mishael Masetu, 2025. "AI-Driven Monitoring and Evaluation: The Future of Transparent and Accountable Governance in Public Project Implementation," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 10(10), pages 722-737, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liesbeth Colen & Sergio Gomez y Paloma & Uwe Latacz-Lohmann & Marianne Lefebvre & Raphaële Préget & Sophie Thoyer, 2016. "Economic Experiments as a Tool for Agricultural Policy Evaluation: Insights from the European CAP," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(4), pages 667-694, December.
    2. Michael Callen & Miguel Fajardo-Steinhauser & Michael G. Findley & Tarek Ghani, 2023. "Can Digital Aid Deliver During Humanitarian Crises?," Papers 2312.13432, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    3. Humphreys Macartan, 2015. "Reflections on the Ethics of Social Experimentation," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 87-112, June.
    4. Macartan Humphreys, 2015. "Reflections on the Ethics of Social Experimentation," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2015-018, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Aidan Coville & Sebastian Galiani & Paul Gertler & Susumu Yoshida, 2020. "Financing Municipal Water and Sanitation Services in Nairobi’s Informal Settlements," NBER Working Papers 27569, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Liesbeth Colen & Sergio Gomez y Paloma & Uwe Latacz-Lohmann & Marianne Lefebvre & Raphaële Préget & Sophie S. Thoyer, 2015. "(How) can economic experiments inform EU agricultural policy?," Post-Print hal-02519194, HAL.
    7. Martin Ravallion, 2018. "Should the Randomistas (Continue to) Rule?," Working Papers 492, Center for Global Development, revised 17 Jan 2019.
    8. Michel Abramowicz & Ariane Szafarz, 2019. "Ethics of Randomized Controlled Trials: Should Economists Care about Equipoise?," Working Papers CEB 19-017, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Marcos Picchio, 2024. "What is the standard of care in experimental development economics?," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 23(2), pages 205-226, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:129122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.