IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/127952.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reforming the funding of long-term care for older people: costs and distributional impacts of planned changes in England

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Bo
  • Hancock, Ruth
  • Wittenberg, Raphael
  • King, Derek
  • Morciano, Marcello

Abstract

Reforms to the means tests in England for state-financed long-term care were planned for implementation in 2025. They included a lifetime limit (cap) on how much an individual must contribute to their care, with the state meeting subsequent care costs. We present projections of the costs and distributional impacts of these reforms for older people, using two linked simulation models which draw on a wide range of data. We project that by 2038 public spending on long-term care for older people in England would be about 14% higher than without the reforms. While the main direct beneficiaries of the lifetime cap would have been the better off who currently receive no state help with their care costs, the reforms also treated capital assets more generously than the current system, helping people with more modest incomes and wealth. When analysing the impacts of the reforms it is therefore important to consider the whole reform package. Our results depend on a range of assumptions, and the impacts of the reforms would be sensitive to the levels of the cap and other reformed parameters of the means test on implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Bo & Hancock, Ruth & Wittenberg, Raphael & King, Derek & Morciano, Marcello, 2025. "Reforming the funding of long-term care for older people: costs and distributional impacts of planned changes in England," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127952, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:127952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/127952/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Hancock & Marcello Morciano & Stephen Pudney, 2019. "Public Support for Older Disabled People: Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing on Receipt of Disability Benefits and Social Care Subsidy," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 19-43, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marenzi, Anna & Rizzi, Dino & Zanette, Michele & Zantomio, Francesca, 2023. "Regional institutional quality and territorial equity in LTC provision," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    2. Grossmann, Jakub & Pertold, Filip & Šoltés, Michal, 2024. "Parental allowance increase and labor supply: Evidence from a Czech reform," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Marenzi, A.; & Rizzi, D.; & Zanette, M.; & Zantomio, F.;, 2022. "Regional Institutional Quality and Territorial Equity in LTC Provision," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 22/27, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    • H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:127952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.