IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/127136.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modernizing a giant: assessing the impact of military-civil fusion on innovation in China’s defence-technological industry

Author

Listed:
  • Dupont-Sinhsattanak, Alexandre

Abstract

In light of China’s objective of achieving complete military modernization by 2035 and becoming a world-class military by 2049, whether it will successfully modernize its military or not is a crucial question for the 21st century. Historically reliant on foreign technologies, China now faces challenges in developing indigenous innovation capabilities. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of financial data from Chinese listed companies with case studies, this paper assesses the impact of military-civil fusion (MCF) on innovation in China’s defence-technological industry. Findings indicate that MCF pushed state-owned enterprises (SOE) to be more efficient and to recentre on core businesses, while encouraging the gradual entry of private firms into the industry. Yet, several limitations exist. SOEs continue to enjoy greater subsidies and better integration into the national innovation system, cementing their advantage over their private counterparts. Private companies function as suppliers of large conglomerates, which remain the only ones capable of assembling advanced weapon systems. By examining the interaction between market dynamics and state-driven strategies, this paper explores the evolving role of China’s private sector in military modernization and underscores the synergies between government support and market interests in fostering innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Dupont-Sinhsattanak, Alexandre, 2025. "Modernizing a giant: assessing the impact of military-civil fusion on innovation in China’s defence-technological industry," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127136, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:127136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/127136/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kerry Liu, 2021. "COVID-19 and the Chinese economy: impacts, policy responses and implications," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 308-330, March.
    2. Sun, Xiuli & Li, Haizheng & Ghosal, Vivek, 2020. "Firm-level human capital and innovation: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Evangelista, Rinaldo & Perani, Giulio & Rapiti, Fabio & Archibugi, Daniele, 1997. "Nature and impact of innovation in manufacturing industry: some evidence from the Italian innovation survey," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 521-536, December.
    4. Maietta, Ornella Wanda, 2015. "Determinants of university–firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1341-1359.
    5. Malik, Tariq H., 2018. "Defence investment and the transformation national science and technology: A perspective on the exploitation of high technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 199-208.
    6. Barbara Bigliardi & Alberto Ivo Dormio, 2009. "An empirical investigation of innovation determinants in food machinery enterprises," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 223-242, April.
    7. Beneito, Pilar, 2003. "Choosing among alternative technological strategies: an empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 693-713, April.
    8. Maietta, Ornella Wanda, 2015. "Determinants of R&D University-Frim Collaboration and Its Impact on Innovation: a Perspective from the Italian Food and Drink Industry," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 225668, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rong Xu & Conggang Li & Cong Cao & Minghao Fang, 2021. "Does science–industry cooperation policy enhance corporate innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 3823-3853, September.
    2. Yue Wu & Yue Yang & Weishun Xu & Qiuxiao Chen, 2020. "The Influence of Innovation Resources in Higher Education Institutions on the Development of Sci-Tech Parks’ Enterprises in the Urban Innovative Districts at the Stage of Urbanization Transformation," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-36, October.
    3. Soriano, Franklin A. & Villano, Renato A. & Fleming, Euan M. & Battese, George E., 2018. "What’s driving innovation in small businesses in Australia? The case of the food industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(01), October.
    4. Huiping Zhu & Haifeng Gu & Habiba Halepoto, 2022. "Can Fulfillment of Social Responsibility Enable Enterprises to Innovate? The Role of Corporate Financialization and Agency Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Modic, Dolores & Suklan, Jana, 2023. "Intellectual property coordinators' cohorts: A study into the imprints in university technology transfer," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    6. Caloghirou, Yannis & Giotopoulos, Ioannis & Kontolaimou, Alexandra & Korra, Efthymia & Tsakanikas, Aggelos, 2021. "Industry-university knowledge flows and product innovation: How do knowledge stocks and crisis matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    7. Klessova, Svetlana & Engell, Sebastian & Thomas, Catherine, 2022. "Assessment of the advancement of market-upstream innovations and of the performance of research and innovation projects," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Schubert, Torben & Darold, Denilton & Will, Markus, 2024. "Measuring the causal economic effects of scientific research: Evidence from the staggered foundation of the SENAI Innovation Institutes in Brazil," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 87, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    9. Comin, Diego & Licht, Georg & Pellens, Maikel & Schubert, Torben, 2018. "Do Companies Benefit from Public Research Organizations? The Impact of the Fraunhofer Society in Germany," Papers in Innovation Studies 2018/7, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    10. Daniela Bragoli & Flavia Cortelezzi & Massimiliano Rigon, 2023. "Firms' innovation and university cooperation. New evidence from a survey of Italian firms," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1400, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    11. Szücs, Florian, 2020. "Do research subsidies crowd out private R&D of large firms? Evidence from European Framework Programmes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    12. Fredrik Niclas Piro, 2019. "The R&D composition of European countries: concentrated versus dispersed profiles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 1095-1119, May.
    13. Paolo Carioli & Dirk Czarnitzki & Christian Rammer, 2024. "Industry-Science-Interaction in Innovation: The Role of Transfer Channels and Policy Support," Working Papers of Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven 751257, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven.
    14. Ornella W. Maietta & Cristian Barra & Roberto Zotti, 2017. "Innovation and University-Firm R&D Collaboration in the European Food and Drink Industry," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(3), pages 749-780, September.
    15. Barra, Cristian & Maietta, Ornella Wanda & Zotti, Roberto, 2016. "Science, university-firm R&D collaboration and innovation across Europe," 2016 Fifth AIEAA Congress, June 16-17, 2016, Bologna, Italy 242320, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    16. Alexandre Dias & Beatriz Selan, 2023. "How does university-industry collaboration relate to research resources and technical-scientific activities? An analysis at the laboratory level," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 392-415, February.
    17. Noman Arshed & Waqas Ahmad & Uzma Hanif, 2022. "A Spatial Temporal Exploration of Factors Motivating Academia-Industry Collaboration," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 521-540, March.
    18. Tiko Iyamu & Olayele Adelakun, 2021. "A global virtual team model to improve software development collaboration project," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 937-956, September.
    19. Luis Roberto Vega-Gonzalez, 2020. "Financial Impedance Matching Method for Enhancing University-Firm Technology Transfer," Research in Business and Management, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(1), pages 11-32, February.
    20. Laura Ciucci & Marie-Antoinette Maupertuis, 2024. "Does technology transfer increase local cognitive proximity between university and industry? The case of Italy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 41(1), pages 173-202, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    China; defence-technological industry; Innovation; military modernization; military-civil fusion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L64 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Other Machinery; Business Equipment; Armaments
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:127136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.