IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/120712.html

Bridging the gap between science and care: a qualitative exploration of the role of the Scientific Linking Pin researcher working in research and practice partnerships

Author

Listed:
  • Everink, Irma
  • Urlings, Judith
  • Griffiths, Alys
  • Verbeek, Hilde
  • Haunch, Kirsty
  • Spilsbury, Karen
  • Hamers, Jan
  • Devi, Reena

Abstract

Context: The Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care (Netherlands) and Nurturing Innovation in Care Homes Excellence in Leeds (NICHE-Leeds; UK) are partnerships between science and care. The Scientific Linking Pin (SLP), a senior researcher employed by a university, works one day per week in a LTC organization, and has a pivotal role in the partnership. Objective: To explore the nature of the SLP role Methods: A qualitative approach was used. Fifteen individuals with at least one year’s experience as a SLP in the Living Lab or NICHE-Leeds participated in a semi-structured interview. Data were thematically analyzed. Findings: Participants described how the SLP role gave them insight into what matters to care organizations, and how it enabled them to impact LTC practice. Participants experienced the role to be multifaceted. Goals and activities performed by SLPs included developing relationships, raising awareness of the practice-science partnership, identifying (research) priorities and generating research questions, building committees, brokering knowledge, developing research studies, generating academic output, building links and connections, and assisting with internal projects. Challenges faced were mistrust by care staff and poor engagement, working with staff from different professional backgrounds, research not being a priority, multiple and rapidly changing priorities, and differences in expectations. SLPs addressed these challenges through relationship building, creating a ‘safe’ space for care staff, building engagement, and expectation management. Implications: Partnership working in the care sector is gaining international recognition and adoption, and therefore it is useful to capture and share learning about successful implementation of our approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Everink, Irma & Urlings, Judith & Griffiths, Alys & Verbeek, Hilde & Haunch, Kirsty & Spilsbury, Karen & Hamers, Jan & Devi, Reena, 2023. "Bridging the gap between science and care: a qualitative exploration of the role of the Scientific Linking Pin researcher working in research and practice partnerships," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120712, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:120712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/120712/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reena Devi & Graham Martin & Jay Banerjee & Louise Butler & Tim Pattison & Lesley Cruickshank & Caroline Maries-Tillott & Tracie Wilson & Sarah Damery & Julienne Meyer & Antonius Poot & Peter Chamberl, 2020. "Improving the Quality of Care in Care Homes Using the Quality Improvement Collaborative Approach: Lessons Learnt from Six Projects Conducted in the UK and The Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Jorrit P Smit & Laurens K Hessels, 2021. "The production of scientific and societal value in research evaluation: a review of societal impact assessment methods [Systems Thinking, Knowledge and Action: Towards Better Models and Methods]," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 323-335.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2024:i:2:p:426-440. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Rosa Kuipers-Dirven & Matthijs Janssen & Jarno Hoekman, 2023. "Assessing university policies for enhancing societal impact of academic research: A multicriteria mapping approach," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 371-383.
    3. Irene Ramos-Vielba & Nicolas Robinson-Garcia & Richard Woolley, 2022. "A value creation model from science-society interconnections: Archetypal analysis combining publications, survey and altmetric data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Turner, James A & Guesmi, Bouali & Gil, José M. & Heanue, Kevin & Sierra, Miguel & Percy, Helen & Bortagaray, Isabel & Chams, Nour & Milne, Cath, 2022. "Evaluation capacity building in response to the agricultural research impact agenda: Emerging insights from Ireland, Catalonia (Spain), New Zealand, and Uruguay," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Reena Devi & Adam Gordon & Tom Dening, 2022. "Enhancing the Quality of Care in Long-Term Care Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-3, January.
    6. Isabel Vogel & Chris Barnett, 2023. "Laying the Foundations for Impact: Lessons from the GCRF Evaluation," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(2), pages 281-297, April.
    7. Adrián A & Oscar Llopis & Pablo D’Este & Jordi Molas-Gallart, 2023. "Assessing the variety of collaborative practices in translational research: An analysis of scientists’ ego-networks," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 426-440.
    8. Thomas, Duncan Andrew & Ramos-Vielba, Irene, 2022. "Reframing study of research(er) funding towards configurations and trails," SocArXiv uty2v, Center for Open Science.
    9. Hans Jonker & Florian Vanlee & Walter Ysebaert, 2022. "Societal impact of university research in the written press: media attention in the context of SIUR and the open science agenda among social scientists in Flanders, Belgium," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7289-7306, December.
    10. repec:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2024:i:2:p:348-355. is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Pacheco – Troisi, Mariangel & García-Melón, Mónica & Jiménez-Sáez, Fernando, 2025. "Anticipatory evaluation. How to incorporate an anticipatory technique into a theory-driven evaluation process. Results of application in a case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Charemza, Wojciech & Lewandowski, Michał & Woźny, Łukasz, 2024. "On journal rankings and researchers' abilities," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3).
    13. Marcello Nonnis & Alessandro Lorenzo Mura & Fabrizio Scrima & Stefania Cuccu & Ferdinando Fornara, 2022. "The Moderation of Perceived Comfort and Relations with Patients in the Relationship between Secure Workplace Attachment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in Elderly Facilities Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Ferreira, Paula & Rocha, Ana & Araujo, Madalena & Afonso, Joao L. & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Lopes, Marta A.R. & Osório, Gerardo J. & Catalão, João P.S. & Lopes, João Peças, 2023. "Assessing the societal impact of smart grids: Outcomes of a collaborative research project," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    15. Sarah Damery & Sarah Flanagan & Janet Jones & Kate Jolly, 2021. "The Effect of Providing Staff Training and Enhanced Support to Care Homes on Care Processes, Safety Climate and Avoidable Harms: Evaluation of a Care Home Quality Improvement Programme in England," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Thomas Woodson & Sophia Boutilier, 2023. "From intent to impact—The decline of broader impacts throughout an NSF project life cycle," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 348-355.
    17. Chollet, Barthélemy & Revet, Karine, 2025. "Expanding the scientist's palette: factors ofengagement with the Arts in geosciences and biology research," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. repec:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2024:i:2:p:371-383. is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Ryuichi Ohta & Yoshinori Ryu & Takuji Katsube & Chiaki Sano, 2020. "Rural Homecare Nurses’ Challenges in Providing Seamless Patient Care in Rural Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Samal, Parshuram & Mondal, Biswajit & Jambhulkar, Nitiprasad Namdeorao & Verma, Ramlakhan & Das, Anup Kumar & Singh, Onkar Nath, 2023. "Evaluation of crop research institutes under data and resource constraints: An alternative approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    21. Timo Y. Maas & Annet Pauwelussen & Esther Turnhout, 2022. "Co-producing the science–policy interface: towards common but differentiated responsibilities," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    22. Anna Dadswell & Ceri Wilson & Hilary Bungay, 2024. "Sustainable Creative Practice with Older People: A Collaborative Approach between Arts and Care Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, April.
    23. Dotti, Nicola Francesco & Walczyk, Julia, 2022. "What is the societal impact of university research? A policy-oriented review to map approaches, identify monitoring methods and success factors," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:120712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.