IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/een/camaaa/2018-04.html

Critically Assessing Estimated DSGE Models: A Case Study of a Multi-Sector Model

Author

Abstract

We describe methods for assessing estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) models. One involves the computation of alternative impulse responses from models constrained to have an identical likelihood and the same contemporaneous signs as responses in the DSGE model. Others ask how well the model matches the data generating process; whether there is weak identification; the consequences of including measurement error with growth rates of non-stationary variables; and whether the model can reproduce features of the data that involve combinations of moments. The methods are applied to a large-scale small-open economy DSGE model, typical of those used at policy institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • X. Liu & A.R. Pagan & T. Robinson, 2018. "Critically Assessing Estimated DSGE Models: A Case Study of a Multi-Sector Model," CAMA Working Papers 2018-04, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
  • Handle: RePEc:een:camaaa:2018-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/2025-01/4_2018_liu_pagan_robinson.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pagan, Adrian & Robinson, Tim, 2022. "Excess shocks can limit the economic interpretation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Sam Ouliaris & Adrian Pagan, 2022. "Three Basic Issues that Arise when Using Informational Restrictions in SVARs," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(1), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Adrian Pagan & Tim Robinson, 2019. "Implications of Partial Information for Applied Macroeconomic Modelling," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2019n12, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    4. Georgiadis, Georgios & Jančoková, Martina, 2020. "Financial globalisation, monetary policy spillovers and macro-modelling: Tales from 1001 shocks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    5. Adrian Pagan & Michael Wickens, 2019. "Checking If the Straitjacket Fits," CAMA Working Papers 2019-81, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    6. Adrian Pagan & Tim Robinson, 2020. "Too many shocks spoil the interpretation," CAMA Working Papers 2020-28, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    7. Daniel Buncic & Adrian Pagan & Tim Robinson, 2023. "Recovering Stars in Macroeconomics," CAMA Working Papers 2023-43, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    8. Xianglong Liu & Adrian R. Pagan & Tim Robinson, 2018. "Critically Assessing Estimated DSGE Models: A Case Study of a Multi‐sector Model," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 94(307), pages 349-371, December.
    9. Christopher G Gibbs & Jonathan Hambur & Gabriela Nodari, 2018. "DSGE Reno: Adding a Housing Block to a Small Open Economy Model," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2018-04, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    10. Christopher G. Gibbs & Jonathan Hambur & Gabriela Nodari, 2021. "Housing and Commodity Investment Booms in a Small Open Economy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 97(317), pages 212-242, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:een:camaaa:2018-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cama Admin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asanuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.