Necessary and possible winners for top-cycles from preferences allowing ties and tentative incompleteness
In autonomous multiagent systems, collective choices among several proposed alternatives are made with the use of voting procedures such as the majority rule. When the elicitation of the agents’ preferences is incomplete but tentative, collective choice procedures commonly aggregate available individual preferences into an incomplete binary relation. From this relation, we can assess the Condorcet winner (the best alternative) if it exists, or, more generally, a choice set (the best compromise solution), by identifying alternatives that are able to be eligible (possible winners) and those that are definitely among the future chosen alternatives (necessary winners). In this context, here we characterise the possible and necessary winner sets for three choice sets: The weak top-cycle (or Smith-set), strong top-cycle (or Schwartz-set) and rational topcycle. We also introduce linear and quadratic time algorithms for computing the necessary winners for the three top-cycles and the possible winners for the weak and strong top-cycles. Finally, we propose efficient heuristics for finding a subset and a superset of possible winners for the rational top-cycle, with its computational tractability staying an open question.
|Date of creation:||Jan 2013|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Campus de Schoelcher, B.P. 7209, 97275 Schoelcher Cedex|
Web page: http://www.ceregmia.eu/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Fortemps, Philippe & Greco, Salvatore & Slowinski, Roman, 2008. "Multicriteria decision support using rules that represent rough-graded preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 206-223, July.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crg:wpaper:dt2013-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Janis Hilaricus)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.