IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12241.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Who Wants Power? Measuring Intrinsic Preferences for Power and Their Behavioral Signature

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Gomez-Martinez
  • Holger Herz

Abstract

People seek positions of influence for material objectives, but it has been argued that people also seek power for its own sake. We propose a novel elicitation strategy that allows us to measure intrinsic preferences for power, where power is defined as influence over the outcomes of others, while fully controlling for all consequentialist sources of utility. We establish the existence of such preferences in general population samples in six countries, with substantial heterogeneity across individuals. Examining this heterogeneity, we show that our behavioral measure of intrinsic preferences for power is positively associated with favorable views of authoritarianism and higher social dominance orientation, and serves as a predictor of political attitudes. We also find significant correlations between intrinsic preferences for power and distributional preferences: Intrinsic preferences for power are predictive of a lower regard for equality. Our evidence thus suggests that the attitudes and preferences of individuals that are motivated by the exercise of power for its own sake differ in systematic ways from those that are not.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Gomez-Martinez & Holger Herz, 2025. "Who Wants Power? Measuring Intrinsic Preferences for Power and Their Behavioral Signature," CESifo Working Paper Series 12241, CESifo.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12241.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • D9 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.