IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt3797p0ws.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Benchmarking “Smart City” Technology Adoption in California: Developing and Piloting a Data Collection Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Frick, Karen Trappenburg PhD
  • Kumar, Tanu PhD
  • Mendonça Abreu, Giselle Kristina
  • Post, Alison PhD

Abstract

In recent years, “smart city” technologies have emerged that allow cities, counties, and other agencies to manage their infrastructure assets more effectively, make their services more accessible to the public, and allow citizens to interface with new web- and mobile-based operators of alternative service providers. This project reviews the academic literature and other sources on potential strengths, weaknesses, and risks associated with smart city technologies. No dataset was found that measures the adoption of such technologies by government agencies. To address this gap, a methodology was developed to guide data collection on the adoption of smart city technologies by urban transportation agencies and other service providers in California. The strategy used involved webscraping; interviews with experts, public agency, and senior level staff; and consultations with technology vendors. The approach was tested by assembling data on the adoption of smart city technologies in California by municipalities and other local public agencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Frick, Karen Trappenburg PhD & Kumar, Tanu PhD & Mendonça Abreu, Giselle Kristina & Post, Alison PhD, 2021. "Benchmarking “Smart City” Technology Adoption in California: Developing and Piloting a Data Collection Approach," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3797p0ws, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt3797p0ws
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3797p0ws.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Kornberger & Chris Carter, 2010. "Manufacturing competition: how accounting practices shape strategy making in cities," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(3), pages 325-349, March.
    2. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Cohen, Adam, 2018. "Equity and Shared Mobility," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1k71f2vv, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Jenni Viitanen & Richard Kingston, 2014. "Smart Cities and Green Growth: Outsourcing Democratic and Environmental Resilience to the Global Technology Sector," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(4), pages 803-819, April.
    4. S Kiavash Fayyaz S. & Xiaoyue Cathy Liu & Guohui Zhang, 2017. "An efficient General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) enabled algorithm for dynamic transit accessibility analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Escolar, Soledad & Villanueva, Félix J. & Santofimia, Maria J. & Villa, David & Toro, Xavier del & López, Juan Carlos, 2019. "A Multiple-Attribute Decision Making-based approach for smart city rankings design," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 42-55.
    6. Sara Safransky, 2020. "Geographies of Algorithmic Violence: Redlining the Smart City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 200-218, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Post, Alison PhD & Ratan, Ishana & Hill, Mary & Huang, Amy & Soga, Kenichi PhD & Zhao, Bingyu PhD, 2021. "Benchmarking “Smart City” Technology Adoption in California: An Innovative Web Platform for Exploring New Data and Tracking Adoption," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5mt4m51n, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Ke Wang & Yafei Zhao & Rajan Kumar Gangadhari & Zhixing Li, 2021. "Analyzing the Adoption Challenges of the Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Smart Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-35, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabrielli do Livramento Gonçalves & Walter Leal Filho & Samara da Silva Neiva & André Borchardt Deggau & Manoela de Oliveira Veras & Flávio Ceci & Maurício Andrade de Lima & José Baltazar Salgueirinho, 2021. "The Impacts of the Fourth Industrial Revolution on Smart and Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Eryu Zhang & Xiaoyu He & Peng Xiao, 2022. "Does Smart City Construction Decrease Urban Carbon Emission Intensity? Evidence from a Difference-in-Difference Estimation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Pollock, Neil & D’Adderio, Luciana, 2012. "Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: Rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 565-586.
    4. The Re‐Arrangements Collective & Fabien Cante & Ajmal Hussain & Timo Makori & Surer Qassim Mohamed & Alana Osbourne & Francesca Pilo' & Kavita Ramakrishnan & AbdouMaliq Simone & Rike Sitas & Adeem Suh, 2023. "Movement 3. Navigating Urban Arrangements," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 483-495, May.
    5. Trencher, Gregory, 2019. "Towards the smart city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 117-128.
    6. Erin McElroy, 2023. "DIS/POSSESSORY DATA POLITICS: From Tenant Screening to Anti‐Eviction Organizing," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 54-70, January.
    7. Justyna Przywojska & Aldona Podgórniak-Krzykacz & Justyna Wiktorowicz, 2019. "Perceptions of Priority Policy Areas and Interventions for Urban Sustainability in Polish Municipalities: Can Polish Cities Become Smart, Inclusive and Green?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Adrienne Csizmady & Zoltán Ferencz & Lea Kőszeghy & Gergely Tóth, 2021. "Beyond the Energy Poor/Non Energy Poor Divide: Energy Vulnerability and Mindsets on Energy Generation Modes in Hungary," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Sławomir Goliszek, 2021. "GIS tools and programming languages for creating models of public and private transport potential accessibility in Szczecin, Poland," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 115-137, January.
    10. Romano Fistola & Mariano Gallo & Rosa Anna La Rocca & Francesca Russo, 2020. "The Effectiveness of Urban Cycle Lanes: From Dyscrasias to Potential Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Kris Hartley, 2023. "Public Perceptions About Smart Cities: Governance and Quality-of-Life in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 731-753, April.
    12. Stephen Leitheiser & Alexander Follmann, 2020. "The social innovation–(re)politicisation nexus: Unlocking the political in actually existing smart city campaigns? The case of SmartCity Cologne, Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(4), pages 894-915, March.
    13. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Peter Nijkamp, 2019. "Creative capital, information and communication technologies, and economic growth in smart cities," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 142-155, February.
    14. Mennicken, Andrea & Kornberger, Martin, 2021. "Von performativität zu generativität: Bewertung und ihre Folgen im Kontext der Digitalisierung," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110925, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Adrian Buttazzoni & Marta Veenhof & Leia Minaker, 2020. "Smart City and High-Tech Urban Interventions Targeting Human Health: An Equity-Focused Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Dorota Bednarska-Olejniczak & Jarosław Olejniczak & Libuše Svobodová, 2019. "Towards a Smart and Sustainable City with the Involvement of Public Participation—The Case of Wroclaw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-33, January.
    17. Joshua Long & Jennifer L Rice, 2019. "From sustainable urbanism to climate urbanism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 992-1008, April.
    18. Irvine Lapsley & Peter Miller & Fabrizio Panozzo, 2010. "Accounting for the city," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(3), pages 305-324, March.
    19. Mora, Luca & Deakin, Mark & Reid, Alasdair, 2019. "Combining co-citation clustering and text-based analysis to reveal the main development paths of smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-69.
    20. Volkov, Artiom & Morkunas, Mangirdas & Balezentis, Tomas & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2022. "Are agricultural sustainability and resilience complementary notions? Evidence from the North European agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt3797p0ws. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.