IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt0f97v7sn.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comprehensive Regional Modeling for Long-Range Planning: Linking Integrated Urban Models and Geographic Information Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Johnston, Robert
  • de la Barra, Thomas

Abstract

This study demonstrates the sequential linking of two types of models to permit the comprehensive evaluation of regional transportation and land use policies. First, we operate an integrated urban model (TRANUS), which represents both land and travel markets with zones and networks. The travel and land use projections from TRANUS are outlined, to demonstrate the general reasonableness of the results, as this is the first application of a market-based urban model in the US. Second, the land use projections for each of the 58 zones in the urban model were fed into a Geographic Information System (GIS)-based land allocation model, which spatially allocates the several land uses within each zone according to simple accessibility rules. While neither model is new, this is one of the first attempts to link these two types of models for regional policy assessments. Other integrated urban models may be linked to other GIS land allocation models in this fashion. Pairing these two types of models allows the user to gain the advantages of the urban models, which represent spatial competition across a region and produce measures of user welfare (traveler and locator surplus), and the advantages of the GIS land allocation models, which produce detailed land use maps that can then be used for environmental impact assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnston, Robert & de la Barra, Thomas, 2000. "Comprehensive Regional Modeling for Long-Range Planning: Linking Integrated Urban Models and Geographic Information Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0f97v7sn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt0f97v7sn
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0f97v7sn.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J D Hunt & D C Simmonds, 1993. "Theory and Application of an Integrated Land-Use and Transport Modelling Framework," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 20(2), pages 221-244, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodier, Caroline J, 2000. "Uncertainty in Travel and Emissions Models: A Case Study in the Sacramento Region," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7cg7f9dd, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Bin Zhou & Kara Kockelman, 2008. "Neighborhood impacts on land use change: a multinomial logit model of spatial relationships," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(2), pages 321-340, June.
    3. Timothy Welch & Sabyasachee Mishra, 2014. "Envisioning an emission diet: application of travel demand mechanisms to facilitate policy decision making," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 611-631, May.
    4. Merlin, Louis A. & Levine, Jonathan & Grengs, Joe, 2018. "Accessibility analysis for transportation projects and plans," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 35-48.
    5. Nina Schwarz & Dagmar Haase & Ralf Seppelt, 2010. "Omnipresent Sprawl? A Review of Urban Simulation Models with Respect to Urban Shrinkage," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(2), pages 265-283, April.
    6. Xianchun Tan & Tangqi Tu & Baihe Gu & Yuan Zeng & Tianhang Huang & Qianqian Zhang, 2021. "Assessing CO 2 Emissions from Passenger Transport with the Mixed-Use Development Model in Shenzhen International Low-Carbon City," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    7. David Hensher & Tu Ton, 2002. "TRESIS: A transportation, land use and environmental strategy impact simulator for urban areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 439-457, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eliasson, Jonas & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2000. "A model for integrated analysis of household location and travel choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 375-394, June.
    2. Shuhong Ma & Yan Zhang & Chaoxu Sun, 2019. "Optimization and Application of Integrated Land Use and Transportation Model in Small- and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Simmonds, David & Feldman, Olga, 2011. "Alternative approaches to spatial modelling," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 2-11.
    4. Tschangho John Kim & Jinsoo You & Seung-kwan Lee, 1998. "An integrated urban systems model with GIS," ERSA conference papers ersa98p374, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Giuseppe Francesco Gori & Renato Paniccià, 2015. "A structural multisectoral model with new economic geography linkages for Tuscany," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94, pages 175-196, November.
    6. Michael J. Clay & Arnold Valdez, 2017. "The Bid-rent Land Use Model of the simple, efficient, elegant, and effective model of land use and transportation," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 449-464, May.
    7. Merlin, Louis A. & Levine, Jonathan & Grengs, Joe, 2018. "Accessibility analysis for transportation projects and plans," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 35-48.
    8. Sakai, Takanori & Kawamura, Kazuya & Hyodo, Tetsuro, 2019. "Evaluation of the spatial pattern of logistics facilities using urban logistics land-use and traffic simulator," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 145-160.
    9. Rodier, Caroline J., 2004. "A Multi-Objective Analysis of Regional Transportation and Land Development Policies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt78q94796, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. Johnston, Robert A., 1994. "The Evaluation of Multimodal Transportation Systems for Economic Efficiency and Other Impacts," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4f87125z, University of California Transportation Center.
    11. Wanle Wang & Ming Zhong & John Douglas Hunt, 2019. "Analysis of the Wider Economic Impact of a Transport Infrastructure Project Using an Integrated Land Use Transport Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Johnston, Robert A. & de la Barra, Tomas, 2000. "Comprehensive regional modeling for long-range planning: linking integrated urban models and geographic information systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 125-136, February.
    13. Rodier, Caroline, 2004. "A Multi-Objective Analysis of Regional Transportation and Land Development Policies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8cv746gq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Keirstead, James & Jennings, Mark & Sivakumar, Aruna, 2012. "A review of urban energy system models: Approaches, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 3847-3866.
    15. Khan, Azhar Shah (James) & Abraham, John E. & Hunt, John Douglas, 2002. "Agent-based micro-simulation of business establishments," ERSA conference papers ersa02p435, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Sylvie Occelli & Giovanni A. Rabino, 1998. "Simulating a Post-Fordist urban system: Results from the PF.US model," ERSA conference papers ersa98p300, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Michael J. Clay & Arnold Valdez & Alex Norr & Samuel M. Otterstrom, 2017. "Uncertainty analysis of the large zone economic module of the simple, efficient, elegant, and effective model (SEM) of land use and transportation," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 855-874, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt0f97v7sn. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.