IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/indrel/qt5573c5bt.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Creative Collaborations from Afar: The Benefits of Independent Authors

Author

Listed:
  • Nemeth, Charlan
  • Goncalo, Jack

Abstract

The number of times that an article is cited has served as an indicator of both its creativity and impact (Feist, 1994; Griggs & Proctor, 2002). In this study, we investigated the relationship between citations and two very simple variables—the number of authors and the number of separate locations. Previous research, on balance, would support the notion that an increased number of collaborators would increase the quality of the product, at least to some asymptote (Ziller, 1957; Torrance, 1971). Research on the effect of separate locations is more sparse. Most work favors collaborations at the same locale, given a sharing of perspective and benefits in terms of coordination and motivation (Handy, 1995; Jarvenpaa & Leidner, 1999). However, research from the minority influence literature documents the stimulating effects of independent and differing views (Nemeth, 2003), leading to the conclusion that independent locations would be an asset. Results from an analysis of six journals over a 10-year period show the benefit of both the number of authors and the number of independent locations. Journals also differed in their citation average, Psychological Review being cited significantly more often than any of the other five journals.

Suggested Citation

  • Nemeth, Charlan & Goncalo, Jack, 2003. "Creative Collaborations from Afar: The Benefits of Independent Authors," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt5573c5bt, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt5573c5bt
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5573c5bt.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph B. Walther, 1995. "Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 186-203, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pamela J. Hinds & Mark Mortensen, 2005. "Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 290-307, June.
    2. Sumita Raghuram & Philipp Tuertscher & Raghu Garud, 2010. "Research Note ---Mapping the Field of Virtual Work: A Cocitation Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 983-999, December.
    3. Nilsson, Magnus & Mattes, Jannika, 2015. "The spatiality of trust: Factors influencing the creation of trust and the role of face-to-face contacts," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 230-244.
    4. Eva-Maria Pesendorfer & Sabine T. Koeszegi, 2006. "Hot Versus Cool Behavioural Styles in Electronic Negotiations: The Impact of Communication Mode," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 141-155, March.
    5. Michele Griessmair & Sabine T. Koeszegi, 2009. "Exploring the Cognitive-Emotional Fugue in Electronic Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 213-234, May.
    6. Wilson, Jeanne M. & Straus, Susan G. & McEvily, Bill, 2006. "All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 16-33, January.
    7. Dandi, Roberto, 2002. "E-mail and Direct Participation in Decision Making: A Literature Review," MPRA Paper 14397, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. de Kervenoael, Ronan & Aykac, D. Selcen O. & Palmer, Mark, 2009. "Online social capital: Understanding e-impulse buying in practice," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 320-328.
    9. Anne-Laure Fayard & Anca Metiu, 2014. "The Role of Writing in Distributed Collaboration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1391-1413, October.
    10. Koay Hean Wei & Khairiah Salwa Mokhtar, 2021. "The Role of Communication in the Process of Forming Market-Oriented Party (Mop): Its Importance and Approaches," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 12(1), pages 57-66.
    11. Yufei Yuan & Milena Head & Mei Du, 2003. "The Effects of Multimedia Communication on Web-Based Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 89-109, March.
    12. Cristina B. Gibson & Jennifer L. Gibbs & Taryn L. Stanko & Paul Tesluk & Susan G. Cohen, 2011. "Including the “I” in Virtuality and Modern Job Design: Extending the Job Characteristics Model to Include the Moderating Effect of Individual Experiences of Electronic Dependence and Copresence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1481-1499, December.
    13. JoAnne Yates & Wanda J. Orlikowski & Kazuo Okamura, 1999. "Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres in Electronic Communication: Reinforcement and Change of Social Interaction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 83-103, February.
    14. Gerardine DeSanctis & Peter Monge, 1999. "Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(6), pages 693-703, December.
    15. Rossi De Mio, Ruggero, 2002. "A Method for a Quantitative Measure of Emotional Intelligence in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication," Working Papers 470, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    16. Gaoyong Li & Xin Zhang & Ge Zhang, 2022. "How the 5G Enabled the COVID-19 Pandemic Prevention and Control: Materiality, Affordance, and (De-)Spatialization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Choon-Ling Sia & Bernard C. Y. Tan & Kwok-Kee Wei, 2002. "Group Polarization and Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Communication Cues, Social Presence, and Anonymity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 70-90, March.
    18. Fayard, Anne-Laure & Metiu, Anca, 2008. "Beyond Orality and Literacy: Letters and Organizational Communication," ESSEC Working Papers DR 08014, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    19. Chris Forman & Anindya Ghose & Batia Wiesenfeld, 2008. "Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 291-313, September.
    20. Jennifer D. Parlamis & Ingmar Geiger, 2015. "Mind the Medium: A Qualitative Analysis of Email Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 359-381, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt5573c5bt. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.