Assessing The Policy Of Engagement With China
China is, and will continue to be for some time to come, a great concern to U.S. administrations. The Clinton administration has chosen to pursue a policy of engagement with China, arguing that it is best to try to bring China into â€œthe community of nationsâ€ rather than to contain and isolate it. Integrating China through a policy of engagement has meant, most importantly, the maintenance and expansion of American trade with, and the encouragement of investments in, China. There have been some limits to the administrationâ€™s policy though, for a tough line has been taken toward China on membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO) and on the piracy of intellectual property (e.g., compact discs and videos). Engagement empowers pacific economic internationalists in China, while containment would likely bring to the fore more aggressive political and economic interests. What are the security implications of such a policy? This paper focuses on the impact that Americaâ€™s economic relations in the policy of engagement with China have had, and will likely have, on the nature of Chinese foreign policy and on U.S.â€“Chinese security relations. In short, we argue that a policy of engagement will have beneficial consequences. Such a policy empowers more pacific economic internationalists in China, while containment would likely weaken those forces and might bring to the fore more aggressive political and economic interests. The risks of engagement are also insignificant in the near term. Because U.S. economic stakes in China are fairly small, they do not carry the danger of tying the hands of U.S. leaders should the Chinese pursue conflictual policies that require the United States to balance against China. A policy of engagement thus promises greater benefits than containment, with few risks.
|Date of creation:||01 Jul 1998|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.escholarship.org/repec/igcc/|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Grieco, Joseph M., 1988. "Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(03), pages 485-507, June.
- repec:sae:niesru:v:149:y::i:1:p:30-52 is not listed on IDEAS
- Katzenstein, Peter J., 1975. "International interdependence: Some long-term trends and recent changes," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(04), pages 1021-1034, September.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:globco:qt7tz1x1jg. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lisa Schiff)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.