IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/ctcres/qt3t77f8th.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Protection from exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke. Policy recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • World Health Organization

Abstract

Scientific evidence has firmly established that there is no safe level of exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS), a pollutant that causes serious illnesses in adults and children. There is also indisputable evidence that implementing 100% smoke-free environments is the only effective way to protect the population from the harmful effects of exposure to SHS. Moreover, several countries and hundreds of subnational and local jurisdictions have successfully implemented laws requiring indoor workplaces and public places to be 100% smoke-free without encountering significant challenges in enforcement. The evidence from these jurisdictions consistently demonstrates not only that smoke-free environments are enforceable, but that they are popular and become more so following implementation. These laws have no negative impact – and often have a positive one – on businesses in the hospitality sector and elsewhere. Their outcomes – an immediate reduction in heart attacks and respiratory problems – also have a positive impact on health. These experiences offer numerous, consistent lessons learnt, which policy-makers should consider to ensure the successful implementation of public policies that effectively protect the population from SHS exposure. These lessons include the following: 1. Legislation that mandates smoke-free environments – not voluntary policies – is necessary to protect public health; 2. Legislation should be simple, clear and enforceable, and comprehensive; 3. Anticipating and responding to the tobacco industry’s opposition, often mobilized through third parties, is crucial; 4. Involving civil society is central to achieving effective legislation; 5. Education and consultation are necessary to ensure smooth implementation; 6. An implementation and enforcement plan as well as an infrastructure for enforcement are essential; 7. Implementation of smoke-free environments must be monitored and, ideally, their impact measured and experiences documented. In light of the above experience, the World Health Organization (WHO) makes the following recommendations to protect workers and the public from exposure to SHS: 1. Remove the pollutant – tobacco smoke – by implementing 100% smoke-free environments. This is the only effective strategy to reduce exposure to tobacco smoke to safe levels in indoor environments and to provide an acceptable level of protection from the dangers of SHS exposure. Ventilation and smoking areas, whether separately ventilated from non-smoking areas or not, do not reduce exposure to a safe level of risk and are not recommended; 2. Enact legislation requiring all indoor workplaces and public places to be 100% smokefree environments. Laws should ensure universal and equal protection for all. Voluntary policies are not an acceptable response to protection. Under some circumstances, the principle of universal, effective protection may require specific quasi-outdoor and outdoor workplaces to be smoke-free; 3. Implement and enforce the law. Passing smokefreelegislation is not enough. Its proper implementation and adequate enforcement require relatively small but critical efforts and means. 4. Implement educational strategies to reduce SHS exposure in the home, recognizing that smoke-free workplace legislation increases the likelihood that people (both smokers and non-smokers) will voluntarily make their homes smoke-free. WHO encourages Member States to follow these recommendations and apply lessons learnt to advance the goals of public health through legislated implementation of 100% smoke-free environments in workplaces and public places.

Suggested Citation

  • World Health Organization, 2007. "Protection from exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke. Policy recommendations," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt3t77f8th, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt3t77f8th
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3t77f8th.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Elizabeth A & Offen, Naphtali & Malone, Ruth E, 2005. "What makes an ad a cigarette ad? Commercial tobacco imagery in the lesbian, gay, and bisexual press," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt606057n9, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nagelhout, Gera E. & Mons, Ute & Allwright, Shane & Guignard, Romain & Beck, François & Fong, Geoffrey T. & de Vries, Hein & Willemsen, Marc C., 2011. "Prevalence and predictors of smoking in "smoke-free" bars. Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(10), pages 1643-1651, May.
    2. repec:eee:hepoli:v:121:y:2017:i:8:p:895-902 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    second-hand smoke; policy; exposure;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt3t77f8th. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lisa Schiff). General contact details of provider: http://www.escholarship.org/repec/ctcre/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.