IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bon/boncrc/crctr224_2025_766.html

The Long Tail Wags the Dog: Platform Design and Bargaining with Majors

Author

Listed:
  • Gaston Llanes

  • Martin Peitz

Abstract

We study a platform that interacts with a major content provider, a long tail of independent providers, and consumers who allocate attention across competing content. By designing independent-provider compensation, the platform endoge nously shapes its outside option and disciplines the major. This strategic use of long-tail compensation distorts entry relative to the first best. Allowing the platform to steer consumer attention improves entry incentives conditional on compensation, but affects bargaining incentives, and may thus increase or de crease welfare. We then consider regulation, showing that conservative minimum compensation floors robustly improve welfare, while non-discrimination policies have ambiguous welfare effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaston Llanes & Martin Peitz, 2026. "The Long Tail Wags the Dog: Platform Design and Bargaining with Majors," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_766, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.crctr224.de/research/discussion-papers/archive/dp766
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Aguiar & Joel Waldfogel & Axel Zeijen, 2024. "Platform Power Struggle: Spotify and the Major Record Labels," NBER Working Papers 33048, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Alexandre de Cornière & Greg Taylor, 2019. "A model of biased intermediation," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(4), pages 854-882, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gambato, Jacopo & Sandrini, Luca, 2025. "Dance to my tune! Discovery mode and built-in recommendation bias," ZEW Discussion Papers 25-037, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Dirk Bergemann & Alessandro Bonatti, 2024. "Data, Competition, and Digital Platforms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(8), pages 2553-2595, August.
    3. Jack (Peiyao) Ma & Andrea Mantovani & Carlo Reggiani & Annette Broocks & Néstor Duch-Brown, 2024. "The Price Effects of Prohibiting Price Parity Clauses: Evidence from International Hotel Groups," Economics Series Working Papers 1043, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    4. Peitz, Martin & Sobolev, Anton, 2024. "Product Recommendations and Price Parity Clauses," CEPR Discussion Papers 19659, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    5. Federico Etro, 2024. "e‐Commerce platforms and self‐preferencing," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1516-1543, September.
    6. Gambato, Jacopo & Sandrini, Luca, 2023. "Not as good as it used to be: Do streaming platforms penalize quality?," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-032, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. David Ronayne, 2021. "Price Comparison Websites," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 62(3), pages 1081-1110, August.
    8. Justin P. Johnson & Andrew Rhodes & Matthijs Wildenbeest, 2023. "Platform Design When Sellers Use Pricing Algorithms," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(5), pages 1841-1879, September.
    9. Xiaoming Cai & Pieter Gautier & Ronald Wolthoff, 2026. "Platform-Controlled Search and Distortions in Attention Allocation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 26-035/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    10. Tin Cheuk Leung & Shi Qi & Koleman Strumpf, 2025. "Dissecting Netflix's Self-Preferencing: Evidence from Viewer-Level Data," Working Papers 25-08, NET Institute.
    11. Jürgen Rösch, 2024. "Market entry as a marketplace owner: when and why should you sell on your marketplace?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 525-541, April.
    12. Wei Zhou & Zidong Wang, 2020. "Competing for Search Traffic in Query Markets: Entry Strategy, Platform Design, and Entrepreneurship," Working Papers 20-12, NET Institute.
    13. Jun Honda & Roman Inderst & Marco Ottaviani, 2024. "When Liability Is Not Enough: Regulating Bonus Payments in Markets with Advice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 1301-1314, February.
    14. Emanuele Bacchiega & Elias Carroni & Alessandro Fedele, 2023. "Monopolistic Duopoly," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS101, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    15. Javier D. Donna & Pedro Pereira, 2024. "Structural Presumptions for Non-horizontal Mergers in the 2023 Merger Guidelines: A Primer and a Path Forward," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 65(1), pages 303-345, August.
    16. Dirk Bergemann & Marek Bojko & Paul DŸtting & Renato Paes Leme & Haifeng Xu & Song Zuo, 2026. "From Conversations to Mechanisms: Aligning Advertiser Incentives in AI-Powered Product Recommendations," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2513, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    17. Steffen, Nico & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Kroon, Peter, 2021. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung in der Plattform- und Datenökonomie," WIK Discussion Papers 481, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    18. Andres Hervas-Drane & Sandro Shelegia, 2025. "Retailer-Led Marketplaces," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(11), pages 9650-9669, November.
    19. Mikhail Drugov & Doh-Shin Jeon, 2026. "Dynamic Recommendation Bias," Working Papers hal-05610431, HAL.
    20. Rhodes, Andrew & Zhou, Jidong, 2024. "Personalization and Privacy Choice," TSE Working Papers 24-1525, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Apr 2025.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation
    • L82 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Entertainment; Media
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Auctions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRC Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crctr224.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.