IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdi/wpmisp/mip_073_26.html

Credit Risk Assessment with Stacked Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Columba

    (Bank of Italy)

  • Manuel Cugliari

    (Bank of Italy)

  • Stefano Di Virgilio

    (Bank of Italy)

Abstract

The Banca d’Italia’s system for the credit assessment of non-financial firms for collateral purposes in monetary policy consists of a statistical model (S-ICAS) and of the analysts’ evaluation. We compare the performance of S-ICAS with that of artificial intelligence – machine learning (ML) – models, including deep learning. We find that deep learning improves the discriminatory power; decision tree ensembles yield a further improvement, as well as a meta-model that stacks the random forests, extreme gradient boosting, and deep learning models. We apply eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques to the meta-model predictions and show that XAI can support analysts in understanding the key factors behind the differences between ML and S-ICAS predictions, thus helping refine their assessment. While interpretability issues prevent ML-based models from being a full alternative to traditional models, XAI allows for their integration within the overall credit assessment process, thus increasing its effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Columba & Manuel Cugliari & Stefano Di Virgilio, 2026. "Credit Risk Assessment with Stacked Machine Learning," Mercati, infrastrutture, sistemi di pagamento (Markets, Infrastructures, Payment Systems) 73, Bank of Italy, Directorate General for Markets and Payment System.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdi:wpmisp:mip_073_26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/mercati-infrastrutture-e-sistemi-di-pagamento/approfondimenti/2026-073/N.73-MISP.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdi:wpmisp:mip_073_26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdigvit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.