IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aue/wpaper/2538.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do SDGs Support Human Security? A Machine Learning Analysis with Policy Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Phoebe Koundouri
  • Kostas Dellis
  • Monika Mavragani
  • Angelos Plataniotis
  • Georgios Feretzakis

Abstract

Human Security (HS) emphasizes safeguarding individuals from pervasive threats-ranging from poverty and health crises to environmental degradation and governance failures-by placing people's rights, needs, and dignity at the center of security and development discourse. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), serving as a global compass for equitable and sustainable progress, inherently support the well-being and resilience of people worldwide. Yet the explicit linkages between these two frameworks are not always clear. This chapter introduces a machine learning (ML) approach to systematically map how HS-related policy documents and reports align with the SDGs. Using advanced language-model embeddings and similarity scoring, our methodology identifies the extent to which each policy text addresses defined HS Aspects and their Material Issues. This allows us to move beyond simple keyword spotting toward capturing nuanced thematic alignment. The resulting scores highlight overlooked connections or synergies, enabling policymakers to see where further integration can enhance outcomes. Our mapping exercise revealed that Economic and Food Security achieved the highest similarity scores, indicating robust policy alignment. Conversely, Technological Security received lower scores, highlighting a gap in addressing digital and innovation challenges within current frameworks and the necessity for integrated policy solutions. By identifying thematic synergies and gaps, we provide policymakers with concrete insights delineate policies that simultaneously enhance SDG outcomes and strengthen HS dimensions. Our results underscore the deep interconnection between HS and the SDGs, advancing our understanding of their mutual supportiveness. This study not only fills a critical gap in research by offering a pragmatic tool for assessing document alignment with the SDGs but also proposes an inclusive framework for policymakers and scholars. This framework encourages the integration of human-centered approaches with sustainable development goals. In doing so, it highlights the essential role of cutting-edge methodologies in navigating the complexities of global security and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Phoebe Koundouri & Kostas Dellis & Monika Mavragani & Angelos Plataniotis & Georgios Feretzakis, 2025. "Do SDGs Support Human Security? A Machine Learning Analysis with Policy Recommendations," DEOS Working Papers 2538, Athens University of Economics and Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:aue:wpaper:2538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wpa.deos.aueb.gr/docs/2025.SDGs.Support.Human.Security.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malvina Bondy & Sefi Roth & Lutz Sager, 2020. "Crime Is in the Air: The Contemporaneous Relationship between Air Pollution and Crime," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(3), pages 555-585.
    2. Phoebe Koundouri & Angelos Alamanos & Angelos Plataniotis & Charalampos Stavridis & Konstantinos Perifanos & Stathis Devves, 2024. "Assessing the sustainability of the European Green Deal and its interlinkages with the SDGs," DEOS Working Papers 2405, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ju, Heng & Tang, Yao & Zhang, Meilan, 2024. "Air Pollution's Grip: Drug Cost and Its Heterogeneity in China," MPRA Paper 121154, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Carozzi, Felipe & Roth, Sefi, 2023. "Dirty density: Air quality and the density of American cities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Luis Sarmiento, 2020. "I Am Innocent: Hourly Variations in Air Pollution and Crime Behavior," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1879, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Isaksen, Elisabeth & Johansen, Bjørn G., 2021. "Congestion pricing, air pollution, and individual-level behavioural responses," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111493, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Dehong Liu & Tiantian Lin & Carl R. Chen & Wenjun Feng, 2025. "Air pollution, analyst information provision, and stock price synchronicity," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 1029-1077, April.
    6. Sandro Provenzano & Sefi Roth & Lutz Sager, 2024. "Air Pollution and Respiratory Infectious Diseases," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(5), pages 1127-1139, May.
    7. Guo, Liwen & Cheng, Zhiming & Tani, Massimiliano & Cook, Sarah & Zhao, Jiaqi & Chen, Xi, 2025. "Air pollution and entrepreneurship," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Joris Klingen & Jos Ommeren, 2022. "Risk-Taking and Air Pollution: Evidence from Chess," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 81(1), pages 73-93, January.
    9. Luis Sarmiento & Adam Nowakowski, 2023. "Court Decisions and Air Pollution: Evidence from Ten Million Penal Cases in India," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(3), pages 605-644, November.
    10. Joris Klingen & Jos van Ommeren, 2020. "Risk attitude and air pollution: Evidence from chess," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-027/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    11. Phoebe Koundouri & Angelos Alamanos & Giannis Arampatzidis & Stathis Devves & Konstantinos Dellis & Christopher Deranian, 2025. "Assessing national climate-neutrality plans through a modelling nexus lens: the case of Greece," DEOS Working Papers 2544, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    12. Bogaard, Mariët & Künn, Steffen & Palacios, Juan & Pestel, Nico, 2024. "Polluted Job Search: The Impact of Poor Air Quality on Reservation Wages," IZA Discussion Papers 17344, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Idiano D'Adamo & Edouard Nicolas Rossi, 2025. "Impact of regional investment on the sustainable development goals: A group analysis of economic and territorial development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 1816-1834, April.
    14. Maik Kecinski & Kent D. Messer & Brandon R. McFadden & Trey Malone, 2020. "Environmental and Regulatory Concerns During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from the Pandemic Food and Stigma Survey," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 1139-1148, August.
    15. Carozzi, Felipe & Roth, Sefi, 2019. "Dirty density: air quality and the density of American cities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103393, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Hener, Timo, 2022. "Noise pollution and violent crime☆," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    17. Luis Sarmiento, 2020. "Waiting for My Sentence: Air Pollution and the Productivity of Court Rulings," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1878, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    18. Sandra Aguilar-Gomez & Nathaly M. Rivera, 2024. "Air Pollution in the Global South: An Overview of Its Sources and Impacts," Working Papers wp561, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    19. Shr, Yau-Huo & Hsu, Wen & Hwang, Bing-Fang & Jung, Chau-Ren, 2023. "Air quality and risky behaviors on roads," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    20. Banzhaf, H. Spencer & Mathews, William & Walsh, Randall, 2024. "Hell with the Lid Off: Racial Segregation and Environmental Equity in America’s Most Polluted City," CEnREP Working Papers 347603, North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aue:wpaper:2538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ekaterini Glynou (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diauegr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.