IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.06856.html

The Agentic ETF: How Agentic Trading Becomes an Asset Class

Author

Listed:
  • Amandeep Singh

Abstract

Three structural trends are converging in public markets: the exchange-traded fund (ETF) has become the dominant fund wrapper, actively managed ETFs are the fastest-growing segment within it, and algorithmic systems now mediate the overwhelming majority of trading volume. We argue that their intersection defines a nascent asset class -- the \emph{Agentic ETF}, a fund whose investment process is delegated to autonomous, large-language-model-driven trading agents that reason over data and execute without a human in the loop. We define agentic trading and distinguish it from rule-based algorithmic trading and robo-advice, decompose the agentic-trading infrastructure into six layers, and identify the incumbent players and structural gaps at each layer. We then present ScalarField.io as a reference implementation of an integrated agentic-trading stack -- spanning a unified multi-venue execution registry, isolated strategy agents with continuous broker reconciliation, first-party market data, and metered compute -- and map its primitives to each layer of the stack. A transparent, assumption-stated sizing exercise suggests the Agentic ETF could plausibly reach hundreds of billions to low trillions of dollars in assets under management by 2030.

Suggested Citation

  • Amandeep Singh, 2026. "The Agentic ETF: How Agentic Trading Becomes an Asset Class," Papers 2610.06856, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.06856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.06856
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terrence Hendershott & Charles M. Jones & Albert J. Menkveld, 2011. "Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(1), pages 1-33, February.
    2. Shijie Wu & Ozan Irsoy & Steven Lu & Vadim Dabravolski & Mark Dredze & Sebastian Gehrmann & Prabhanjan Kambadur & David Rosenberg & Gideon Mann, 2023. "BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Finance," Papers 2303.17564, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Gong, 2026. "AI Agents in Financial Markets: Architecture, Applications, and Systemic Implications," Papers 2603.13942, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    2. Zefeng Chen & Darcy Pu, 2026. "Autonomous Market Intelligence: Agentic AI Nowcasting Predicts Stock Returns," Papers 2601.11958, arXiv.org.
    3. Mohammed-Khalil Ghali & Cecil Pang & Oscar Molina & Carlos Gershenson-Garcia & Daehan Won, 2025. "Forecasting Commodity Price Shocks Using Temporal and Semantic Fusion of Prices Signals and Agentic Generative AI Extracted Economic News," Papers 2508.06497, arXiv.org.
    4. Nils Köbis & Zoe Rahwan & Raluca Rilla & Bramantyo Ibrahim Supriyatno & Clara Bersch & Tamer Ajaj & Jean-François Bonnefon & Iyad Rahwan, 2025. "Delegation to artificial intelligence can increase dishonest behaviour," Nature, Nature, vol. 646(8083), pages 126-134, October.
    5. Evangelos Benos & Satchit Sagade, 2012. "High-frequency trading behaviour and its impact on market quality: evidence from the UK equity market," Bank of England Staff Working Paper series 469, Bank of England.
    6. Bellia, Mario & Christensen, Kim & Kolokolov, Aleksey & Pelizzon, Loriana & Renò, Roberto, 2022. "Do designated market makers provide liquidity during a flash crash?," SAFE Working Paper Series 270, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2022.
    7. Tamer Khraisha & Keren Arthur, 2018. "Can we have a general theory of financial innovation processes? A conceptual review," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Bruno Biais & Fany Declerck & Sophie Moinas, 2016. "Who supplies liquidity, how and when?," BIS Working Papers 563, Bank for International Settlements.
    9. Indriawan, Ivan & Martinez, Valeria & Tse, Yiuman, 2021. "The impact of the change in USDA announcement release procedures on agricultural commodity futures," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    10. Ching-Nam Hang & Pei-Duo Yu & Roberto Morabito & Chee-Wei Tan, 2024. "Large Language Models Meet Next-Generation Networking Technologies: A Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-29, October.
    11. Dangxing Chen & Pengzhan Guo, 2026. "Shapley in Context: Explaining Financial Language with Domain Expertise," Papers 2607.00856, arXiv.org.
    12. NIdhi Aggarwal & Venkatesh Panchapagesan & Susan Thomas, 2022. "When is the Order to Trade Ratio fee effective?," Working Papers 8, xKDR.
    13. Kang, Jongho & Kang, Jangkoo & Kwon, Kyung Yoon, 2022. "Market versus limit orders of speculative high-frequency traders and price discovery," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Ahmed Baig & Nasim Sabah & Drew Winters, 2019. "Have Stock Prices become more Uniformly Distributed?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(2), pages 1242-1250.
    15. Robert J. Kauffman & Yuzhou Hu & Dan Ma, 2015. "Will high-frequency trading practices transform the financial markets in the Asia Pacific Region?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1-27, December.
    16. Uctum, Remzi & Renou-Maissant, Patricia & Prat, Georges & Lecarpentier-Moyal, Sylvie, 2017. "Persistence of announcement effects on the intraday volatility of stock returns: Evidence from individual data," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 43-56.
    17. George Jiang & Ingrid Lo & Giorgio Valente, 2014. "High-Frequency Trading around Macroeconomic News Announcements: Evidence from the U.S. Treasury Market," Staff Working Papers 14-56, Bank of Canada.
    18. Aggarwal, Nidhi & Panchapagesan, Venkatesh & Thomas, Susan, 2023. "When is the order-to-trade ratio fee effective?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    19. Bank, Matthias & Baumann, Ralf H., 2016. "Price formation, market quality and the effects of reduced latency in the very short run," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 629-645.
    20. Jing Nie & Juliana Malagon & Julian Williams, 2022. "The impact of high speed quoting on execution risk dynamics: Evidence from interest rate futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(8), pages 1434-1465, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.06856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.