IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.14049.html

Homophily and transitivity in dynamic network formation

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Dano
  • Bryan S. Graham
  • Yassine Sbai Sassi

Abstract

In social and economic networks linked agents often share connections in common. There are two competing explanations for this phenomenon. First, agents may have a structural taste for transitive links - the returns to linking may be higher if two agents share a common connection. Second, agents may assortatively match on unobserved attributes, a process called homophily. We study parameter identifiability in a simple model of dynamic network formation with both effects. Agents form, maintain, and dissolve links over time to maximize utility. The return to linking may be higher if agents share connections in common. A pair-specific utility component allows for arbitrary homophily on time-invariant agent attributes. We derive conditions under which it is possible to detect the presence of a taste for transitivity in the presence of assortative matching on unobservables. We leave the joint distribution of the initial network and the pair-specific utility component, both high dimensional nuisance parameters, unrestricted. Our identification result is constructive, suggesting an analog estimator, whose finite and (single) large network properties we characterize. We show, via examples, the delicacy of information accumulation in the single (large) network setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Dano & Bryan S. Graham & Yassine Sbai Sassi, 2026. "Homophily and transitivity in dynamic network formation," Papers 2609.14049, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.14049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.14049
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10840 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Marcel Fafchamps & Flore Gubert, 2007. "Risk Sharing and Network Formation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(2), pages 75-79, May.
    3. Kevin Dano & Bo E. Honor'e & Martin Weidner, 2025. "Binary choice logit models with general fixed effects for panel and network data," Papers 2508.11556, arXiv.org.
    4. Bryan S. Graham, 2017. "An Econometric Model of Network Formation With Degree Heterogeneity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 1033-1063, July.
    5. Newey, Whitney K, 1991. "Uniform Convergence in Probability and Stochastic Equicontinuity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 1161-1167, July.
    6. Card, David & Sullivan, Daniel G, 1988. "Measuring the Effect of Subsidized Training Programs on Movements in and out of Employment," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 497-530, May.
    7. Matthew O. Jackson & Tomas Rodriguez-Barraquer & Xu Tan, 2012. "Social Capital and Social Quilts: Network Patterns of Favor Exchange," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(5), pages 1857-1897, August.
    8. Lorenzo Ductor & Marcel Fafchamps & Sanjeev Goyal & Marco J. van der Leij, 2014. "Social Networks and Research Output," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(5), pages 936-948, December.
    9. Bryan S. Graham, 2017. "An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity," CeMMAP working papers 08/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    10. Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham & Guido W. Imbens, 2013. "Social Networks and the Identification of Peer Effects," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 253-264, July.
    11. Francis Bloch & Matthew Jackson, 2006. "Definitions of equilibrium in network formation games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 34(3), pages 305-318, October.
    12. Kevin Dano, 2023. "Transition Probabilities and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Fixed Effects Logit Models," Papers 2303.00083, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    13. Bo E. Honoré & Elie Tamer, 2006. "Bounds on Parameters in Panel Dynamic Discrete Choice Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 611-629, May.
    14. Bo E. Honoré & Ekaterini Kyriazidou, 2000. "Panel Data Discrete Choice Models with Lagged Dependent Variables," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 839-874, July.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4392 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Gary Chamberlain, 1980. "Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 47(1), pages 225-238.
    17. Fafchamps, Marcel & Gubert, Flore, 2007. "The formation of risk sharing networks," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 326-350, July.
    18. Wayne Yuan Gao & Yi Niu, 2026. "Identification in Dynamic Dyadic Network Formation Models with Fixed Effects," Papers 2604.07488, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graham, Bryan S., 2020. "Network data," Handbook of Econometrics,, Elsevier.
    2. Bryan S. Graham, 2019. "Network Data," CeMMAP working papers CWP71/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. Bryan S. Graham, 2019. "Network Data," NBER Working Papers 26577, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Bryan S. Graham, 2016. "Homophily and transitivity in dynamic network formation," CeMMAP working papers CWP16/16, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    5. Bryan S. Graham, 2016. "Homophily and transitivity in dynamic network formation," CeMMAP working papers 16/16, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Bryan S. Graham, 2017. "An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity," CeMMAP working papers 08/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    7. Kevin Dano & Bo E. Honor'e & Martin Weidner, 2025. "Binary choice logit models with general fixed effects for panel and network data," Papers 2508.11556, arXiv.org.
    8. Zuckerman, David, 2024. "Multidimensional homophily," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 486-513.
    9. Alejandro Sanchez-Becerra, 2022. "The Network Propensity Score: Spillovers, Homophily, and Selection into Treatment," Papers 2209.14391, arXiv.org.
    10. Menzel, Konrad, 2026. "Strategic network formation with many agents," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    11. Lucas Resende & Guillaume Lecu'e & Lionel Wilner & Philippe Chon'e, 2025. "Statistical Inference in Large Multi-way Networks," Papers 2512.02203, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    12. Claudia Pigini & Alessandro Pionati & Francesco Valentini, 2025. "Grouped fixed effects regularization for binary choice models," Papers 2502.06446, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    13. Tadao Hoshino & Daichi Shimamoto & Yasuyuki Todo, 2020. "Accounting for Heterogeneity in Network Formation Behaviour: An Application to Vietnamese SMEs," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 82(5), pages 1042-1067, October.
    14. Raúl Duarte & Frederico Finan & Horacio Larreguy & Laura Schechter, 2019. "Brokering Votes With Information Spread Via Social Networks," NBER Working Papers 26241, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Alex Centeno, 2022. "A Structural Model for Detecting Communities in Networks," Papers 2209.08380, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    16. à ureo de Paula & Seth Richards†Shubik & Elie Tamer, 2018. "Identifying Preferences in Networks With Bounded Degree," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 263-288, January.
    17. Andreas Dzemski, 2019. "An Empirical Model of Dyadic Link Formation in a Network with Unobserved Heterogeneity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 101(5), pages 763-776, December.
    18. Bryan S. Graham, 2017. "An Econometric Model of Network Formation With Degree Heterogeneity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 1033-1063, July.
    19. Francesco Bartolucci & Claudia Pigini & Francesco Valentini, 2024. "MCMC conditional maximum likelihood for the two-way fixed-effects logit," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 379-404, July.
    20. Brice Romuald Gueyap Kounga, 2023. "Nonseparable Dyadic Regression," Papers 2310.12825, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.14049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.