IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.16856.html

zLend: A Dual-Scope Cash-Flow Reconstruction Framework for On-Chain Credit Underwriting

Author

Listed:
  • Girish G N
  • Ashutosh Sahoo
  • Akshay SP
  • Gurukiran S
  • Dhanashekar Kandaswamy

Abstract

Decentralized lending lacks a credit bureau: a borrower's capacity to repay must be inferred entirely from public on-chain activity, without income verification or a liability record. This paper presents zLend, a deployed cash-flow underwriting framework that reconstructs a wallet's daily balance history from raw token transfers and derives short-duration repayment-capacity signals from it. The reconstruction is performed twice per wallet, once restricted to a fixed stablecoin basket and once over all fungible transfers, on the premise that a wallet's total token holdings and its liquid, spendable balance are distinct quantities whose conflation misprices risk. From each series we derive liquidity coverage against a fixed loan size, cash-flow volatility and regularity, a drawdown-and-recovery statistic adapted from quantitative finance, and a recurring-counterparty detector that identifies salary-like payment cadence from transfer timing alone. The two views are then compared: a wallet with large aggregate holdings whose stablecoin reserve rarely covers the loan size is flagged as a liquidity mismatch irrespective of total wealth. We specify the pipeline formally, document the golden-master methodology used to verify a cross-language production migration to numerical tolerance 1e-9, and characterize the tier function's parameter sensitivity with an independent reimplementation validated to exact agreement (78 of 78 field assertions) against the deployed system's reference fixtures. Tier assignment is governed predominantly by the reference loan size, with four of six reference wallets changing tier across loan sizes from USD 10 to USD 25,000; the drawdown and coverage criteria bind on disjoint wallets, so neither subsumes the other; and no criterion in the tier rule is inert. zLend is deployed in production, informing real lending decisions via third-party API integrations.

Suggested Citation

  • Girish G N & Ashutosh Sahoo & Akshay SP & Gurukiran S & Dhanashekar Kandaswamy, 2026. "zLend: A Dual-Scope Cash-Flow Reconstruction Framework for On-Chain Credit Underwriting," Papers 2608.16856, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.16856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.16856
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dhanashekar Kandaswamy & Ashutosh Sahoo & Akshay SP & Gurukiran S & Parag Paul & Girish G N, 2025. "Deep Reputation Scoring in DeFi: zScore-Based Wallet Ranking from Liquidity and Trading Signals," Papers 2507.20494, arXiv.org.
    2. Sirio Aramonteand & Wenqian Huang & Andreas Schrimpf, 2021. "DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, December.
    3. Tobias Berg & Valentin Burg & Ana Gombović & Manju Puri, 2020. "On the Rise of FinTechs: Credit Scoring Using Digital Footprints," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(7), pages 2845-2897.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dunbar, Kwamie & Treku, Daniel N. & Owusu-Amoako, Johnson, 2026. "The decentralization enigma in DeFi: Impact of U.S. federal funds rate changes," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(3).
    2. Lucas A. Mariani & Jose Renato Haas Ornelas & Bernardo Ricca, 2023. "Banks’ Physical Footprint and Financial Technology Adoption," Working Papers Series 576, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    3. Lu, Yao & Zhan, Shuwei & Zhan, Minghua, 2024. "Has FinTech changed the sensitivity of corporate investment to interest rates?—Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Giorgio Abate & Nicola Branzoli & Raffaele Gallo, 2023. "Crypto-Asset Markets: Structure, Market Developments in 2022 and Policy Considerations," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 76(3), pages 353-386.
    5. Sun, Xiaoyan & Xie, Xuanli, 2024. "How does digital finance promote entrepreneurship? The roles of traditional financial institutions and BigTech firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Wu, Wenyang & Tang, Shenfeng, 2024. "Bank credit in the digital age: Expansion or excessive expansion?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Li, Yawen & Xia, Yufei & Sun, Zongting & Sun, Naili, 2025. "Does digital transformation affect systemic risk? Evidence from the banking sector in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Sumin Hu & Qi Zhu & Xia Zhao & Ziyue Xu, 2023. "Digital Finance and Corporate Sustainability Performance: Promoting or Restricting? Evidence from China’s Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Carlo Campajola & Marco D'Errico & Claudio J. Tessone, 2022. "MicroVelocity: rethinking the Velocity of Money for digital currencies," Papers 2201.13416, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    10. Kevin Bauer & Andreas Grunewald & Florian Hett & Johanna Jagow & Maximilian Speicher, 2026. "Treatment Targeting by Scaled Behavioral Measurement," CESifo Working Paper Series 12772, CESifo.
    11. Cornelli, Giulio & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Garratt, Rodney & Reghezza, Alessio, 2025. "Why DeFi lending? Evidence from Aave V2," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Doerr, Sebastian & Frost, Jon & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Shreeti, Vatsala, 2023. "Big techs in finance," CEPR Discussion Papers 18665, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    13. Liu, Yangjingzhuo & Wang, Daoping & Fan, Xiaoyun, 2026. "Fintech, systemic risk and bank performance: Based on the perspective of systemic-risk-adjusted performance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. BAHNEAN Paul-Gheorghe & MESTERU Emanuel George & BRATU Renate Doina, 2025. "Behavioural Changes And Trends In Commercial Banks' Lending Policies For Companies In Romania - Perspectives For The New Decade," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 77(3), pages 22-29, December.
    15. Lu, Yao & Li, Lu & Zhan, Huanqi & Zhan, Minghua, 2024. "Fintech, information heterogeneity, and the regional distribution effects of corporate financing constraints," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Pattnaik, Subhransu & Kramer, Berber & Ward, Patrick, 2026. "Dynamic effects of digital credit on agricultural investment and production: Experimental evidence from India," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404346, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Rui Xu, 2026. "Fintech Competition and Banks’ Shrinking Margins in Brazil," IMF Working Papers 2026/007, International Monetary Fund.
    18. Kai Feng & Han Hong & Ke Tang & Jingyuan Wang, 2025. "Statistical Tests for Replacing Human Decision Makers with Algorithms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(11), pages 9145-9170, November.
    19. Carbune Daniela Iulia Maria, 2025. "Digitalization And Banking Performance In The European Union: An Empirical Outlook On Npl, Roa, Roe And Desi Index," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 499-510, December.
    20. Yiyan Huang & Cheuk Hang Leung & Xing Yan & Qi Wu & Nanbo Peng & Dongdong Wang & Zhixiang Huang, 2020. "The Causal Learning of Retail Delinquency," Papers 2012.09448, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.16856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.