IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.12493.html

Beyond the Skew-Stickiness Ratio: Transport Geometry of Spot-Driven Variance Surface Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Charlie Che
  • Pradeepta Das

Abstract

The dynamics of an implied volatility surface to movements of the underlying is classically described by separate rules: sticky strike, sticky delta and Bergomi's skew-stickiness ratio (SSR). We unify these as a transport of the total-variance surface along a velocity field, $\partial_u w = v\,\partial_k w$, on the class of static-arbitrage-free surfaces. The SSR is the zeroth-order term of a Taylor (jet) hierarchy that also governs skew and curvature dynamics, making the velocity profile $v(k)$ estimable from a time series of surfaces rather than a single scalar. We give explicit conditions on v under which the flow preserves butterfly and calendar arbitrage-freeness over a finite spot move, with an admissibility radius in closed form; sticky delta, sticky strike and the SSR are the constant-velocity transports, while local and rough volatility are not special cases and are reproduced only in their short-maturity at-the-money velocity. The transport representation restricts nothing unless v is bounded across smile extrema, and we turn this into a test. Writing the response as a transport part $v\,\partial_k w$ plus a residual source s, at a smile extremum, where the skew vanishes---bounded transport predicts no response at its speed, so any response measured there is pure source. This gives a joint estimator of velocity and source that never divides by a near-zero skew, with an arbitrage theorem for the source term. On five years of SPX surfaces across seven tenors we reject self-similar transport at every tenor and a strike-constant velocity at intermediate tenors; at the two shortest tenors, where the smile minimum lies within the quoted strike range, the response is pure transport at the money but carries a genuine source at the minimum. Out of sample, the extended model improves curvature dynamics over the scalar SSR, the regime most relevant for positions carrying vanna and volga.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlie Che & Pradeepta Das, 2026. "Beyond the Skew-Stickiness Ratio: Transport Geometry of Spot-Driven Variance Surface Dynamics," Papers 2608.12493, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.12493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.12493
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rama Cont & Jose da Fonseca, 2002. "Dynamics of implied volatility surfaces," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 45-60.
    2. H. Berestycki & J. Busca & I. Florent, 2002. "Asymptotics and calibration of local volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 61-69.
    3. C. Bayer & P. K. Friz & A. Gulisashvili & B. Horvath & B. Stemper, 2019. "Short-time near-the-money skew in rough fractional volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 779-798, May.
    4. Mathias Beiglbock & Pierre Henry-Labord`ere & Friedrich Penkner, 2011. "Model-independent Bounds for Option Prices: A Mass Transport Approach," Papers 1106.5929, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2013.
    5. René Carmona & Sergey Nadtochiy, 2009. "Local volatility dynamic models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-48, January.
    6. P. Balland, 2002. "Deterministic implied volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 31-44.
    7. Mathias Beiglböck & Pierre Henry-Labordère & Friedrich Penkner, 2013. "Model-independent bounds for option prices—a mass transport approach," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 477-501, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergey Nadtochiy & Jan Obłój, 2017. "Robust Trading Of Implied Skew," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-41, March.
    2. Sergey Nadtochiy & Jan Obloj, 2016. "Robust Trading of Implied Skew," Papers 1611.05518, arXiv.org.
    3. Sebastian Herrmann & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2017. "Model uncertainty, recalibration, and the emergence of delta–vega hedging," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 873-930, October.
    4. Sebastian Herrmann & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2017. "Model Uncertainty, Recalibration, and the Emergence of Delta-Vega Hedging," Papers 1704.04524, arXiv.org.
    5. Mathias Beiglbock & Marcel Nutz, 2014. "Martingale Inequalities and Deterministic Counterparts," Papers 1401.4698, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2014.
    6. Juho Kanniainen & Martin Magris, 2018. "Option market (in)efficiency and implied volatility dynamics after return jumps," Papers 1810.12200, arXiv.org.
    7. Julio Backhoff-Veraguas & Gudmund Pammer, 2019. "Stability of martingale optimal transport and weak optimal transport," Papers 1904.04171, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    8. Sergey Badikov & Mark H. A. Davis & Antoine Jacquier, 2018. "Perturbation analysis of sub/super hedging problems," Papers 1806.03543, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    9. Sergey Badikov & Antoine Jacquier & Daphne Qing Liu & Patrick Roome, 2016. "No-arbitrage bounds for the forward smile given marginals," Papers 1603.06389, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2016.
    10. Daniel Bartl & Michael Kupper & David J. Prömel & Ludovic Tangpi, 2019. "Duality for pathwise superhedging in continuous time," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 697-728, July.
    11. Alessandro Doldi & Marco Frittelli, 2023. "Entropy martingale optimal transport and nonlinear pricing–hedging duality," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 255-304, April.
    12. Seungho Yang & Jaewook Lee, 2014. "Do affine jump-diffusion models require global calibration? Empirical studies from option markets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 111-123, January.
    13. David Hobson & Anthony Neuberger, 2016. "On the value of being American," Papers 1604.02269, arXiv.org.
    14. Acciaio, B. & Backhoff-Veraguas, J. & Zalashko, A., 2020. "Causal optimal transport and its links to enlargement of filtrations and continuous-time stochastic optimization," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(5), pages 2918-2953.
    15. Kupper, Michael & Nendel, Max & Sgarabottolo, Alessandro, 2025. "Risk measures based on weak optimal transport," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 734, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    16. Luciano Campi & Ismail Laachir & Claude Martini, 2014. "Change of numeraire in the two-marginals martingale transport problem," Papers 1406.6951, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    17. Ivan Guo & Jan Obl'oj, 2025. "Robust Pricing and Hedging of American Options in Continuous Time," Papers 2510.05463, arXiv.org.
    18. David Hobson & Dominykas Norgilas, 2019. "Robust bounds for the American put," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 359-395, April.
    19. Ivan Guo & Severin Nilsson & Johannes Wiesel, 2025. "Dynamic characterization of barycentric optimal transport problems and their martingale relaxation," Papers 2511.21287, arXiv.org.
    20. Matteo Burzoni & Marco Frittelli & Marco Maggis, 2015. "Model-free Superhedging Duality," Papers 1506.06608, arXiv.org, revised May 2016.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.12493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.