IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2605.31306.html

Posterior and Likelihood Sensitivity in Bayesian Distributionally Robust Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Jun-ya Gotoh
  • Andrew E. B. Lim
  • Michael Jong Kim

Abstract

We introduce the notion of worst-case posterior and worst-case likelihood sensitivity. These measure, respectively, the sensitivity of the expected cost to worst-case perturbations of the posterior distribution and worst-case perturbations of the likelihood of a Bayesian model. Each defines a quantitative measure of robustness. A decision maker concerned about the sensitivity of the out-of-sample expected cost to deviations from her assumptions will want a decision for which both sensitivities are small. We derive posterior and likelihood sensitivities for uncertainty sets defined in terms of deviation measures. Posterior sensitivity vanishes when the posterior variance shrinks to zero, which occurs when parameter uncertainty is eliminated from learning. Parameter learning does not eliminate likelihood sensitivity. A distributionally robust formulation of a Bayesian optimization problem makes a near-Pareto-optimal tradeoff between performance (expected cost) and robustness (posterior and likelihood sensitivity).

Suggested Citation

  • Jun-ya Gotoh & Andrew E. B. Lim & Michael Jong Kim, 2026. "Posterior and Likelihood Sensitivity in Bayesian Distributionally Robust Optimization," Papers 2605.31306, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.31306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.31306
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Rockafellar & Stan Uryasev & Michael Zabarankin, 2006. "Generalized deviations in risk analysis," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 51-74, January.
    2. Bertsimas, Dimitris & Copenhaver, Martin S., 2018. "Characterization of the equivalence of robustification and regularization in linear and matrix regression," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(3), pages 931-942.
    3. Rui Gao & Anton Kleywegt, 2023. "Distributionally Robust Stochastic Optimization with Wasserstein Distance," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 603-655, May.
    4. Jun‐ya Gotoh & Michael Jong Kim & Andrew E. B. Lim, 2021. "Calibration of Distributionally Robust Empirical Optimization Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 1630-1650, September.
    5. Rui Gao & Xi Chen & Anton J. Kleywegt, 2024. "Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization and Variation Regularization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1177-1191, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun-ya Gotoh & Michael Jong Kim & Andrew E. B. Lim, 2020. "Worst-case sensitivity," Papers 2010.10794, arXiv.org.
    2. Castaño-Martínez, A. & Pigueiras, G. & Ramos, C.D. & Sordo, M.A., 2025. "Ordering higher risks in Yaari's dual theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Dimitrios G. Konstantinides & Georgios C. Zachos, 2019. "Exhibiting Abnormal Returns Under a Risk Averse Strategy," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 551-566, June.
    4. Björn Häckel, 2010. "Risikoadjustierte Wertbeiträge zur ex ante Entscheidungsunterstützung: Ein axiomatischer Ansatz," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 81-108, June.
    5. Thai Chuong, 2013. "Newton-like methods for efficient solutions in vector optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 495-516, April.
    6. Balbás, Alejandro & Balbás, Beatriz & Heras, Antonio, 2011. "Stable solutions for optimal reinsurance problems involving risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 796-804, November.
    7. Patrick Krieger & Carsten Lausberg, 2021. "Entscheidungen, Entscheidungsfindung und Entscheidungsunterstützung in der Immobilienwirtschaft: Eine systematische Literaturübersicht [Decisions, decision-making and decisions support systems in real estate: a systematic literature review]," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 7(1), pages 1-33, April.
    8. Branda, Martin, 2013. "Diversification-consistent data envelopment analysis with general deviation measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 626-635.
    9. M. A. Lejeune & H. N. Nguyen, 2026. "Distributionally robust fractional optimization of probability of exceedance," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 127-174, January.
    10. Jun‐ya Gotoh & Michael Jong Kim & Andrew E. B. Lim, 2021. "Calibration of Distributionally Robust Empirical Optimization Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 1630-1650, September.
    11. Schuhmacher, Frank & Eling, Martin, 2012. "A decision-theoretic foundation for reward-to-risk performance measures," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2077-2082.
    12. López-Díaz, Miguel & Sordo, Miguel A. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2012. "On the Lp-metric between a probability distribution and its distortion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 257-264.
    13. Wenjun Jiang & Qingqing Zhang & Yiying Zhang, 2026. "Distributionally Robust Insurance under Bregman-Wasserstein Divergence," Papers 2604.27837, arXiv.org.
    14. Balbás, Alejandro & Balbás, Beatriz & Balbás, Raquel, 2016. "Must an optimal buy and hold strategy contain any derivative?," IC3JM - Estudios = Working Papers 23912, Instituto Mixto Carlos III - Juan March de Ciencias Sociales (IC3JM).
    15. Wang, Menghang & Lu, Lan & Liu, Lindong & Wu, Jie, 2026. "Cost allocation in a robust two-stage resource allocation game: Fairness and robustness," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    16. Xuejun Zhao & William B. Haskell & Guodong Yu, 2024. "Supply Chain Contracts in the Small Data Regime," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1387-1401, July.
    17. Constantine Alexander Vitt & Darinka Dentcheva & Hui Xiong, 2025. "Risk-averse classification," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 354(3), pages 1353-1387, November.
    18. Tan, Mao & Jiang, Hongwei & Kuang, Yi & Li, Kang & Wang, Rui & Li, Zibin, 2025. "Electricity–carbon dual response for energy-intensive enterprise: A co-optimization approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    19. Doron Nisani, 2023. "On the General Deviation Measure and the Gini coefficient," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 19(3), pages 599-610, September.
    20. Xia Han & Bin Wang & Ruodu Wang & Qinyu Wu, 2021. "Risk Concentration and the Mean-Expected Shortfall Criterion," Papers 2108.05066, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.31306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.