IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.17862.html

Stronger core results with multidimensional prices

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Braverman
  • Jingyi Liu
  • Eric Xue
  • Chenghan Zhou

Abstract

We study one-sided matchings with endowments in the absence of money. It is well-known that a competitive equilibrium may not always exist and that the strong core may be empty in this setting [Hylland and Zeckhauser, 1979]. We propose a generalization of competitive equilibria that associates each item with a multi-dimensional price. We show that this solution concept always exists and resides within the rejective core [Konovalov, 2005]. Rejective core stability is strictly stronger than weak core stability: allocations in the rejective core are elements of the weak core, but the opposite is not true. Moreover, we show that the rejective core always converges to the set of competitive equilibria with multi-dimensional prices as the economy grows, demonstrating core convergence in a setting without non-satiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Braverman & Jingyi Liu & Eric Xue & Chenghan Zhou, 2026. "Stronger core results with multidimensional prices," Papers 2603.17862, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.17862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.17862
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aumann, Robert J & Dreze, Jacques H, 1986. "Values of Markets with Satiation or Fixed Prices," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 54(6), pages 1271-1318, November.
    2. Shapley, Lloyd & Scarf, Herbert, 1974. "On cores and indivisibility," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 23-37, March.
    3. Maxfield, Robert R., 1997. "General equilibrium and the theory of directed graphs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 23-51, February.
    4. Moore, James C, 1975. "The Existence of "Compensated Equilibrium" and the Structure of the Pareto Efficiency Frontier," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 16(2), pages 267-300, June.
    5. Alexander Konovalov, 2005. "The core of an economy with satiation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 25(3), pages 711-719, April.
    6. E. Eisenberg, 1961. "Aggregation of Utility Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 337-350, July.
    7. Polemarchakis, H. M. & Siconolfi, P., 1993. "Competitive equilibria without free disposal or nonsatiation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 85-99.
    8. J. Whittaker & H. Abraham & D. R. Smart, 1996. "Existence of competitive equilibrium when incomes may be zero (*)," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 8(1), pages 177-182.
    9. Yinghua He & Antonio Miralles & Marek Pycia & Jianye Yan, 2018. "A Pseudo-Market Approach to Allocation with Priorities," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 272-314, August.
    10. Hylland, Aanund & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1979. "The Efficient Allocation of Individuals to Positions," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(2), pages 293-314, April.
    11. Eric Budish & Yeon-Koo Che & Fuhito Kojima & Paul Milgrom, 2013. "Designing Random Allocation Mechanisms: Theory and Applications," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(2), pages 585-623, April.
    12. Bergstrom, Theodore C., 1976. "How to discard `free disposability' - at no cost," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 131-134, July.
    13. Federico Echenique & Antonio Miralles & Jun Zhang, 2021. "Constrained Pseudo-Market Equilibrium," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(11), pages 3699-3732, November.
    14. Echenique, Federico & Miralles, Antonio & Zhang, Jun, 2023. "Balanced equilibrium in pseudo-markets with endowments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 428-443.
    15. Makarov, V. L., 1981. "Some results on general assumptions about the existence of economic equilibrium," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 87-99, March.
    16. Faruk Gul & Wolfgang Pesendorfer & Mu Zhang, 2024. "Efficient Allocation of Indivisible Goods in Pseudomarkets with Constraints," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(11), pages 3708-3736.
    17. Roth, Alvin E. & Postlewaite, Andrew, 1977. "Weak versus strong domination in a market with indivisible goods," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 131-137, August.
    18. Phuong Le, 2017. "Competitive equilibrium in the random assignment problem," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 13(4), pages 369-385, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Oslington, 2012. "General Equilibrium: Theory and Evidence," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(282), pages 446-448, September.
    2. Echenique, Federico & Miralles, Antonio & Zhang, Jun, 2023. "Balanced equilibrium in pseudo-markets with endowments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 428-443.
    3. Florig, Michael, 2001. "Hierarchic competitive equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 515-546, July.
    4. W D A Bryant, 2009. "General Equilibrium:Theory and Evidence," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 6875.
    5. Manjunath, Vikram, 2016. "Fractional matching markets," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 321-336.
    6. Miralles, Antonio & Pycia, Marek, 2021. "Foundations of pseudomarkets: Walrasian equilibria for discrete resources," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Sandomirskiy, Fedor & Ushchev, Philip, 2024. "The geometry of consumer preference aggregation," CEPR Discussion Papers 19100, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    8. Th`anh Nguyen & Alexander Teytelboym & Shai Vardi, 2025. "Efficiency, Envy, and Incentives in Combinatorial Assignment," Papers 2509.13198, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    9. Young-San Lin & Hai Nguyen & Thành Nguyen & Kemal Altinkemer, 2022. "Allocation with Weak Priorities and General Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(5), pages 2804-2819, September.
    10. Zhan Wang & Jinpeng Ma & Hongwei Zhang, 2023. "Stable and envy-free lottery allocations for affordable housing," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 8(1), pages 1-55, December.
    11. Jugal Garg & Thorben Trobst & Vijay V. Vazirani, 2020. "One-Sided Matching Markets with Endowments: Equilibria and Algorithms," Papers 2009.10320, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    12. Phuong Le, 2017. "Competitive equilibrium in the random assignment problem," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 13(4), pages 369-385, December.
    13. Le, Phuong, 2013. "Competitive Equilibrium in the Random Assignment Problem," MPRA Paper 66290, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Jorge Rivera & Michael Florig, 2004. "Indivisible Goods and Fiat Money," Econometric Society 2004 Latin American Meetings 167, Econometric Society.
    15. Jingsheng Yu & Jun Zhang, 2020. "Efficient and fair trading mechanisms for resource exchange in market design," Papers 2005.06878, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2025.
    16. Cornet, Bernard & Topuzu, Mihaela & Yildiz, Aysegul, 2003. "Equilibrium theory with a measure space of possibly satiated consumers," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3-4), pages 175-196, June.
    17. Florig, Michael & Rivera, Jorge, 2017. "Existence of a competitive equilibrium when all goods are indivisible," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 145-153.
    18. Ioannis Panageas & Thorben Trobst & Vijay V. Vazirani, 2021. "Time-Efficient Algorithms for Nash-Bargaining-Based Matching Market Models," Papers 2106.02024, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    19. Hafalir, Isa E. & Kojima, Fuhito & Yenmez, M. Bumin, 2025. "Market design with distributional objectives: Efficiency, incentives, and property rights," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    20. Nesterov, Alexander S., 2017. "Fairness and efficiency in strategy-proof object allocation mechanisms," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 145-168.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.17862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.