IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.16720.html

Discrimination-insensitive pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen Miao
  • Silvana Pesenti

Abstract

Rendering fair prices for financial, credit, and insurance products is of ethical and regulatory interest. In many jurisdictions, discriminatory covariates, such as gender and ethnicity, are prohibited from use in pricing such instruments. In this work, we propose a discrimination-insensitive pricing framework, where we require the pricing principle to be insensitive to the (exogenously determined) protected covariates, that is the sensitivity of the pricing principle to the protected covariate is zero. We formulate and solve the optimisation problem that finds the nearest (in Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence) "pricing" measure to the real world probability, such that under this pricing measure the principle is discrimination-insensitive. We call the solution the discrimination-insensitive measure and provide conditions for its existence and uniqueness. In situations when there are more than one protected covariates, the discrimination-insensitive pricing measure might not exist, and we propose a two-step procedure. First, for each protected covariate separately, we find the measure under which the pricing principle becomes insensitivity to that covariate. Second we reconcile these measures through a constrained barycentre model. We provide a close-form solution to this problem and give conditions for existence and uniqueness of the constrained barycentre pricing measure. As an intermediary result, we prove the representation, existence, and uniqueness of the KL barycentre of general probability measures, which may be of independent interest. Finally, in a numerical illustration, we compare our discrimination-insensitive premia and the constrained barycentre pricing measure with recently proposed fair premia from the actuarial literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen Miao & Silvana Pesenti, 2026. "Discrimination-insensitive pricing," Papers 2603.16720, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.16720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.16720
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer Alonso-García & María del Carmen Boado-Penas & Pierre Devolder, 2018. "Adequacy, fairness and sustainability of pay-as-you-go-pension-systems: defined benefit versus defined contribution," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(13), pages 1100-1122, September.
    2. Fei Huang & Silvana M. Pesenti, 2025. "Marginal Fairness: Fair Decision-Making under Risk Measures," Papers 2505.18895, arXiv.org.
    3. Galina Andreeva & Jake Ansell & Jonathan Crook, 2004. "Impact of anti-discrimination laws on credit scoring," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 22-33, September.
    4. Edward W. (Jed) Frees & Fei Huang, 2023. "The Discriminating (Pricing) Actuary," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 2-24, January.
    5. Bruno Pelletier, 2005. "Informative barycentres in statistics," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 57(4), pages 767-780, December.
    6. Lindholm, M. & Richman, R. & Tsanakas, A. & Wüthrich, M.V., 2022. "Discrimination-Free Insurance Pricing," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(1), pages 55-89, January.
    7. Christophe Hurlin & Christophe Pérignon & Sébastien Saurin, 2026. "The Fairness of Credit Scoring Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 406-425, January.
    8. Wang, Shaun S. & Young, Virginia R. & Panjer, Harry H., 1997. "Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 173-183, November.
    9. Alonso-Garcia, Jennifer & Boado-Penas, Maria del Carmen & Devolder, Pierre, 2018. "Adequacy, fairness and sustainability of pay-as-you-go-pension-systems: defined benefit versus defined contribution," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2018026, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    10. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    11. Xi Xin & Fei Huang, 2024. "Antidiscrimination Insurance Pricing: Regulations, Fairness Criteria, and Models," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 285-319, April.
    12. Mathias Lindholm & Ronald Richman & Andreas Tsanakas & Mario V. Wuthrich, 2022. "A Discussion of Discrimination and Fairness in Insurance Pricing," Papers 2209.00858, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fei Huang & Silvana M. Pesenti, 2025. "Marginal Fairness: Fair Decision-Making under Risk Measures," Papers 2505.18895, arXiv.org.
    2. Ho Ming Lee & Katrien Antonio & Benjamin Avanzi & Lorenzo Marchi & Rui Zhou, 2025. "Machine Learning with Multitype Protected Attributes: Intersectional Fairness through Regularisation," Papers 2509.08163, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    3. Tim J. Boonen & Xinyue Fan & Zixiao Quan, 2025. "Fairness-Aware Insurance Pricing: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach," Papers 2512.24747, arXiv.org.
    4. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2025. "Differential quantile-based sensitivity in discontinuous models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(2), pages 554-572.
    5. Hong Beng Lim & Mengyi Xu & Kenneth Q. Zhou, 2026. "Fair Pricing in Long-Term Insurance: A Unified Framework," Papers 2602.04791, arXiv.org.
    6. Boonen, Tim J. & Liu, Fangda, 2022. "Insurance with heterogeneous preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Alonso-García, Jennifer & Devolder, Pierre, 2019. "Continuous time model for notional defined contribution pension schemes: Liquidity and solvency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-76.
    8. Morsomme, Hélène & Alonso-Garcia, Jennifer & Devolder, Pierre, 2024. "Intergenerational risk sharing in pay-as-you-go pension schemes," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2024011, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    9. Diego Wachs & Jorge Onrubia, 2021. "Automatic adjustment mechanisms in public pension reforms: Effects over fiscal sustainability, adequacy, and fairness," Working Papers 2021-05, FEDEA.
    10. Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas & Wang, Ruodu, 2024. "A theory of multivariate stress testing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 851-866.
    11. Henrique Ferreira Morici & Elena Vigna, 2025. "Optimal additional voluntary contribution in DC pension schemes to manage inadequacy risk," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 48(2), pages 1031-1063, December.
    12. Alvarez, Jesús-Adrián & Kallestrup-Lamb, Malene & Kjærgaard, Søren, 2021. "Linking retirement age to life expectancy does not lessen the demographic implications of unequal lifespans," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 363-375.
    13. Nicos A. Scordis, 2026. "Transparency in Place of Fair Insurance Pricing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 91-104, February.
    14. Julia Callaway & Cosmo Strozza & Sven Drefahl & Eleonora Mussino & Ilya Kashnitsky, 2024. "Mortality inequalities at retirement age between migrants and non-migrants in Denmark and Sweden," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 50(18), pages 473-502.
    15. Calcetero Vanegas, Sebastián & Badescu, Andrei L. & Lin, X. Sheldon, 2024. "Effective experience rating for large insurance portfolios via surrogate modeling," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 25-43.
    16. Xingmin Yin & Haitao Xia & Xiaochen Zheng, 2025. "An Evaluation of China’s Basic Pension Insurance Benefit Adjustment Policy to Ensure Sustainability, Guarantee, and Fairness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Mariarosaria Coppola & Maria Russolillo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "An Indexation Mechanism for Retirement Age: Analysis of the Gender Gap," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Ronald Richman & Mario V. Wüthrich, 2023. "LASSO regularization within the LocalGLMnet architecture," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 17(4), pages 951-981, December.
    19. Jesús-Adrián Álvarez & Malene Kallestrup-Lamb & Søren Kjærgaard, 2020. "Linking retirement age to life expectancy does not lessen the demographic implications of unequal lifespans," CREATES Research Papers 2020-17, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    20. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.16720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.