IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2601.08641.html

Resisting Manipulative Bots in Meme Coin Copy Trading: A Multi-Agent Approach with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Author

Listed:
  • Yichen Luo
  • Yebo Feng
  • Jiahua Xu
  • Yang Liu

Abstract

Copy trading has become the dominant entry strategy in meme coin markets. However, due to the market's extremely illiquid and volatile nature, the strategy exposes an exploitable attack surface: adversaries deploy manipulative bots to front-run trades, conceal positions, and fabricate sentiment, systematically extracting value from na\"ive copiers at scale. Despite its prevalence, bot-driven manipulation remains largely unexplored, and no robust defensive framework exists. We propose a manipulation-resistant copy-trading system based on a multi-agent architecture powered by a multi-modal large language model (LLM) and chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. Our approach outperforms zero-shot and most statistic-driven baselines in prediction accuracy as well as all baselines in economic performance, achieving an average copier return of 3% per meme coin investment under realistic market frictions. Overall, our results demonstrate the effectiveness of agent-based defenses and predictability of trader profitability in adversarial meme coin markets, providing a practical foundation for robust copy trading.

Suggested Citation

  • Yichen Luo & Yebo Feng & Jiahua Xu & Yang Liu, 2026. "Resisting Manipulative Bots in Meme Coin Copy Trading: A Multi-Agent Approach with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning," Papers 2601.08641, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.08641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.08641
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuan Li & Bingqiao Luo & Qian Wang & Nuo Chen & Xu Liu & Bingsheng He, 2024. "A Reflective LLM-based Agent to Guide Zero-shot Cryptocurrency Trading," Papers 2407.09546, arXiv.org.
    2. Qian'ang Mao & Yuxuan Zhang & Jiaman Chen & Wenjun Zhou & Jiaqi Yan, 2025. "Know Your Intent: An Autonomous Multi-Perspective LLM Agent Framework for DeFi User Transaction Intent Mining," Papers 2511.15456, arXiv.org.
    3. Bruno Mazorra & Victor Adan & Vanesa Daza, 2022. "Do Not Rug on Me: Leveraging Machine Learning Techniques for Automated Scam Detection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Zhe Shen & Wei Jiang & Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng, 2025. "Irrationality-Aware Human Machine Collaboration: Mitigating Alterfactual Irrationality in Copy Trading," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 2213-2234, December.
    5. Jiahua Xu & Yebo Feng & Daniel Perez & Benjamin Livshits, 2023. "Auto.gov: Learning-based Governance for Decentralized Finance (DeFi)," Papers 2302.09551, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    6. Yichen Luo & Yebo Feng & Jiahua Xu & Paolo Tasca & Yang Liu, 2025. "LLM-Powered Multi-Agent System for Automated Crypto Portfolio Management," Papers 2501.00826, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    7. Alberto Maria Mongardini & Alessandro Mei, 2025. "A Midsummer Meme's Dream: Investigating Market Manipulations in the Meme Coin Ecosystem," Papers 2507.01963, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    8. Arash Aloosh & Jiasun Li, 2024. "Direct Evidence of Bitcoin Wash Trading," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(12), pages 8875-8921, December.
    9. Jiahua Xu & Benjamin Livshits, 2018. "The Anatomy of a Cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump Scheme," Papers 1811.10109, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2019.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gandal, Neil & Hamrick, JT & Rouhi, Farhang & Mukherjee, Arghya & Feder, Amir & Moore, Tyler & Vasek, Marie, 2018. "The Economics of Cryptocurrency Pump and Dump Schemes," CEPR Discussion Papers 13404, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Yichen Luo & Yebo Feng & Jiahua Xu & Paolo Tasca & Yang Liu, 2025. "LLM-Powered Multi-Agent System for Automated Crypto Portfolio Management," Papers 2501.00826, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    3. Dun Li & Dezhi Han & Zibin Zheng & Tien-Hsiung Weng & Kuan-Ching Li & Ming Li & Shaokang Cai, 2024. "Does Short-and-Distort Scheme Really Exist? A Bitcoin Futures Audit Scheme through BIRCH & BPNN Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 1649-1671, April.
    4. Castillo León, Jaime & Lehar, Alfred, 2026. "What data have told us about decentralized finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Udit Agarwal & Vinay Rishiwal & Sudeep Tanwar & Mano Yadav, 2024. "Blockchain and crypto forensics: Investigating crypto frauds," International Journal of Network Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), March.
    6. Niklas Konstantin Klein & Fritz Lattermann & Dirk Schiereck, 2023. "Investment in non-fungible tokens (NFTs): the return of Ethereum secondary market NFT sales," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 241-254, July.
    7. Mostapha Benhenda, 2026. "Look-Ahead-Bench: a Standardized Benchmark of Look-ahead Bias in Point-in-Time LLMs for Finance," Papers 2601.13770, arXiv.org.
    8. Taro Tsuchiya, 2021. "Profitability of cryptocurrency Pump and Dump schemes," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 149-167, June.
    9. Muneer M. Alshater & Mayank Joshipura & Rim El Khoury & Nohade Nasrallah, 2023. "Initial Coin Offerings: a Hybrid Empirical Review," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 891-908, October.
    10. Costola, Michele & Iacopini, Matteo & Santagiustina, Carlo R.M.A., 2021. "On the “mementum” of meme stocks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    11. José Luis Miralles-Quirós & María Mar Miralles-Quirós, 2022. "Mathematics, Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-2, June.
    12. Daniel Kirste & Niclas Kannengie{ss}er & Ricky Lamberty & Ali Sunyaev, 2023. "Automated Market Makers in Cryptoeconomic Systems: A Taxonomy and Archetypes," Papers 2309.12818, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    13. Aadi Singhi, 2025. "An Adaptive Multi Agent Bitcoin Trading System," Papers 2510.08068, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    14. Ardia, David & Bluteau, Keven, 2024. "Twitter and cryptocurrency pump-and-dumps," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    15. Timoth'ee Fabre & Ioane Muni Toke, 2025. "High-Frequency Market Manipulation Detection with a Markov-modulated Hawkes process," Papers 2502.04027, arXiv.org.
    16. Annette Alstadsæter & Matthew Collin & Andreas Økland, 2025. "Safely Opening Pandora’s Box: A Guide for Researchers Working with Leaked Data," Working Papers 032, EU Tax Observatory.
    17. Sihao Hu & Zhen Zhang & Shengliang Lu & Bingsheng He & Zhao Li, 2022. "Sequence-Based Target Coin Prediction for Cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump," Papers 2204.12929, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    18. Sun, Yan & Yang, Sung-Byung, 2024. "Are ICOs the best? A comparison of different fundraising models in blockchain-based fundraising," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    19. Arthur A. B. Pessa & Matjaz Perc & Haroldo V. Ribeiro, 2023. "Age and market capitalization drive large price variations of cryptocurrencies," Papers 2302.12319, arXiv.org.
    20. Dean Fantazzini & Yufeng Xiao, 2023. "Detecting Pump-and-Dumps with Crypto-Assets: Dealing with Imbalanced Datasets and Insiders’ Anticipated Purchases," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-73, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.08641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.